View source for User:RD/9k/Q6077

{{NextNineThousand|PPPA=Susie can change the Prophecy|User=RD|E=Q60,77|Contents=y}}
== Main entry ==
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean">

{{li|start=y|I=S2/ES|Q=60,77|Q2=6077}}Susie being herself can change the Prophecy / Ralsei believes that Susie being herself can change the Prophecy (variation)  ->  there we go! straightforward Existentialist interpretation of Deltarune. I have to be neutral on this theory "as a model" because there's nothing inherently wrong with this inside the context of fiction. I like it far better than that one early-chapters schizoanalyst interpretation that is infamous in my mind for how bad the original real-life theories are {{YouTube|xz2sR0OWVAk}} {{YouTube|9UKQ_9y4bdw}}

</li></ol>

== Susie ==

<ol class="hue clean">

{{li|start=y|I=S2/ES|Q=60,55|Q2=6055}}Fictional futures come from characters' free will / Fictional futures come from the free will of fictional individuals / Twilight Sparkle invents the future, and should Lauren Faust not outline that correctly she is wrong / Susie authors the future, independently of whether Toby Fox creates that correctly or incorrectly  ->  message more or less stated in <cite>Deltarune</cite> chapter 4, and which all its fans really run wildly with, but which I don't really like personally. the reasons are complex. I think this is slightly better the statement that authors design utterly everything and fiction contains no causality, but not entirely correct.

</li></ol>

== Non-narrative thinking ==

<ol class="hue clean">

{{li|start=y|I=S2/ES|tradition=MX onto ES|Q=60,69|Q2=6069}}Deltarune is an example of [[Term:historical existentialism|historical existentialism]]

{{li|I=S1/ES|Q=60,61|Q2=6061}}non-narrative thinking / ([[User:RD/9k/Q60,61|9k]])

{{li|I=S2/ES|Q=60,60|Q2=6060}}Linear time prevents individuals from realizing fictions / ([[User:RD/9k/Q60,60|9k]])

</li></ol>

== Overlap with Undertale ==

<ol class="hue clean">

{{li|start=y|I=S2/DFy|tradition=ES onto Fy|Q=61,10|Q2=6110}}Game worlds are cultural fabrications

</li></ol>

== meta-Marxist critique ==

<ol class="hue clean">

{{li|start=y|I=S2/MX|tradition=MX onto Fy|Q=60,56|Q2=6056}}Fictional futures come from fictional individuals / Susie holds the path to a different ending because she is a different person, not because she wrote it / Twilight Sparkle creates the future because she and her friends are unique material objects  ->  I don't know if this is literally true of Deltarune, but this is the issue I have with Deltarune as a metaphor for real life. this is the claim that fictional individuals create their future, but not specifically through the process of Free Will, perhaps instead through the process of groups of individuals interacting together to produce favorable historical processes. Twilight succeeds because multiple Ponies actually cooperate together. Susie can only change the future if Kris and Ralsei want the same future as she does.

{{li|I=F2/Fy|Q=60,62|Q2=6062}}[[E:BecauseAuthorSaidSo|Fictional events only happen because the author said so]] / ([[User:RD/9k/Q6063|9k]])  ->  no. if this were true Media Representation would be impossible. say there's a fictional book meant to teach people about the United States Reconstruction era, or slaves escaping to the North. can somebody just go around saying that every single thing that happens in that book is the author's opinionated agenda peculiar to their own individual tastes? ... many well-written stories don't look intentionally designed although they in fact are, and you keep this in mind if you want to solve them.

</li></ol>

== Related ==<!--

<ol class="hue clean">

</li></ol>-->

== Ideologies or fields ==

* MX / existential materialism
* MX onto Fy / existential-materialist literary analysis


[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]]  <!-- page ends here.  TTS-unfriendly numbers incoming
redirects:   [[User:RD/9k/Q6077]]
duplication hint:   copy markup from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN|9k/Q60,77]] -->