Editing Ontology:Q2961 (section)

== Core characteristics ==

<dl class="wikitable hue">
{{HueClaim|P=item type| {{Template:S2}} }}
{{HueRoster|P={{Ontology:PPPA/L}}| {{Ontology:Q2961}} }}
{{HueClaim|P={{Ontology:PPPA}}| Individual choices cannot create possibilities which do not already exist | To create Freedom, individual choices must be the best choice, but that cannot be known when the world is always full of unknown information }}
{{HueRoster|P={{Ontology:P42}}| -- }}  <!-- en: QID references -->
{{HueRoster|P={{Ontology:P56}}| existential materialism }}  <!-- en: color swatch references -->
{{HueRoster|P={{Ontology:P3}}| -- }}  <!-- en: sub-case of -->
{{HueRoster|P={{Ontology:P4}}| existential-materialist conjecture }}  <!-- en: case of -->
{{HueRoster|P={{Ontology:P5}}| -- }}  <!-- en: super-case of -->
{{HueClaim|P=[[User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand|prototype]] notes| everyone acts like individual choices can fix everything. <em>everything</em>. but most of the time that's impossible to pull off because making the correct individual choice requires having information about what the choice will result in, that none of us actually have. you can directly throw Gödel's incompleteness theorem at that claim. it's impossible to reason your way to the correct decision when reasoning never perfectly grounds itself in reality. so in effect, it's impossible to use individual decisions to create Freedom. there we go, first decent logical proof against Guattari. as ironic as using propositional logic may be given what I just said. that doesn't matter right now. }}
</dl>

=== Components ===

<dl class="wikitable hue">
{{HueRoster|P=model combines claims| -- }}
</dl>

=== Use in thesis portals ===

<dl class="wikitable hue">
{{HueRoster|P=appears in work| --}}
</dl>