Editing Ontology:Q3302 (section)

== Characteristics in draft ==

<dl class="wikitable hue">
{{HueClaim|P=item type| {{Template:S2}} }}
{{HueRoster|P={{Ontology:PPPA/L}}|lang=en| {{Ontology:Q3302}} }}
{{HueClaim|P={{Ontology:PPPA}}|lang=en| anarchism is near-synonymous with Existentialism }}
{{HueRoster|P={{Ontology:P42}}| {{Ontology:Q3300}} }}  <!-- en: QID references -->
{{HueRoster|P={{Ontology:P34}}| {{Ontology:Q92}} }}  <!-- en: field, scope, or group -->
{{HueRoster|P={{Ontology:P3}}| -- }}  <!-- en: subset of -->
{{HueRoster|P={{Ontology:P4}}| -- }}  <!-- en: instance of -->
{{HueRoster|P={{Ontology:P5}}| -- }}  <!-- en: superset of -->
{{HueRoster|P=[[User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand|prototype]] notes| the claim that Anarchism's actual model of society is the same cluster of Existentialist models Liberalism uses, and then each of them builds other larger-scale village/town/region propositions on top of that. I don't really know if this is true. it would take a bit of investigation to build a decent logical proof either way. this concept comes out of the works of Horst Stowasser, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v{{=}}70ZKnaANBdg] who claims that anarchism is "not an ideology" (impossible, but go on) but a cluster of things based on "freedom", "hostility to domination", "solidarity", "mutual aid", "autonomy of the individual", "networks of small units", "self determination", and "rebellion against foreign determination". 5/8 of those are Existentialist values, and half of them can be co-opted into Liberalism. }}
</dl>

=== Components ===

<dl class="wikitable hue">
{{HueRoster|P={{Ontology:P6}}| -- }}
</dl>