Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Prototype
Items
Properties
All Categories
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Philosophical Research
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Ontology:Q770
(section)
Ontology
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Core characteristics == <dl class="wikitable hue"> {{HueClaim |P=item type| {{Template:S1}} }} {{HueRoster|EP=PPPA/L|lang=en| {{E:Q770}} | [[E:people-gambling]] }} {{HueClaim |EP=PPPA|lang=en| -- }} {{HueRoster|EP=P42| slot machine miss | number-based sign }} <!-- en: QID references --> {{HueRoster|EP=P56| -- }} <!-- en: color swatch references --> {{HueRoster|EP=P3| -- }} <!-- en: subset of --> {{HueRoster|EP=P4| -- }} <!-- en: instance of --> {{HueRoster|EP=P5| -- }} <!-- en: superset of --> {{HueRoster|EP=P147| -- }} <!-- en: local Lexeme --> {{HueClaim|P=[[User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand|prototype]] notes| the usually non-fictional motif of sorting through a lot of people to hit the jackpot and find the right people. this motif is inherent in most "job interview advice", as well as some "relationship advice", "product marketing advice", and rants against "social media". however, it also comes up in other unexpected places, like looking through a lot of books on a particular topic to find a book which is considered good or useful for some purpose. most people consider people-gambling perfectly normal. (as much as that totally baffles me.) this is often missed in critiques of "social media" as uniquely bad β if everything in life involves gambling on groups of people like some kind of poker deck, why wouldn't it be obvious for videos or microblog posts to work that way? }} </dl> === Components === <dl class="wikitable hue"> {{HueRoster|P=model combines claims| -- }} </dl>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Philosophical Research may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar
free resource
.
Copyright is complete nonsense
, but people do have to buy items to be able to charge anyone taxes.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)