Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Prototype
Items
Properties
All Categories
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Philosophical Research
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Category:Historical processes ontology
(section)
Category
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Marxist historical processes == [[User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand|"here is how I think the order goes:"]] * having one theorist that understand science -> achieved by: Trotskyism. * national independence -> achieved by: postcolonial theories * defeating Liberal-republicanism and creating party-nation -> achieved by: Deng Xiaoping Thought * not creating capitalism -> achieved by: Juche-socialism (briefly) * creating Bolshevism -> achieved by: Communist party of the Soviet Union ** mono- phase of non-capitalism ** poly- phase of non-capitalism -> achieved by: nobody. hopefully graph economics could get us here? * dictatorship of the proletariat -> must include a party-nation, as contradictory as that is, and a capable proletariat that keeps the party-nation in check * age of multi-Bolshevism * hypothetical age of poly-Bolshevism * hypothetical age of world republic [[Category:Historical materialism ontology (general-sense)]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Philosophical Research may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar
free resource
.
Copyright is complete nonsense
, but people do have to buy items to be able to charge anyone taxes.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
