Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Prototype
Items
Properties
All Categories
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Philosophical Research
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Philosophical Research:Molecular Democracy/5.2/1001 PiesNeverWork
(section)
Project page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== The philosophy of pies == <div style="white-space: pre-wrap;">The above story about pies is a metaphor for the history of scientific socialism and the Communist Internationals. In every First World country, the standard story about Marxism is that Marxism "doesn't work", with the implied subtext that Liberalism is the default way of understanding human populations that is immediately intuitive to all "normal people" and Marxism is nothing but some crazy experiment put together in some particular nerdy theorist's garage, doomed to never see popular relevance in the greater world population. Another way we can state this same narrative is that Marxism _will never_ work. The deceptively-simple phrase "does not" actually conceals a much greater statement about a vast array of geographical locations, every one of these locations' possible choices, and every conceivable possible future that may happen as a consequence of these actions, not to mention how these choices and consequences are mediated by the interactions between a particular location and other locations. ... If we had the same attitude toward technology and inventions that we had toward workers' states, who can say how many things humanity would not have successfully invented that it in fact has? would we have given up on inventing airplanes? Would we have never invented color video recordings? Would we have set aside the effort to explain all subatomic and macroscopic phenomena in terms of quantum field theory, or the ongoing effort to unify the three known fundamental interactions and gravity? Would we still live in a world without light bulbs, a technology only one century ago termed a "conspicuous failure"? In our daily lives we rarely hear about how pies never work, even though it is fully possible to fail to bake a pie. We seldom hear about books never work, even as hundreds of thousands of people have failed to write a book. We hardly ever hear about how pianos never work, even as millions of people have failed to learn to play the piano. Yet we tend to hear a lot about how Marxism "never works". What is the difference? arguably, the difference is that most people have never properly conceptualized Marxism as a physical innovation consisting of material parts. ... [unfinished] </div>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Philosophical Research may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar
free resource
.
Copyright is complete nonsense
, but people do have to buy items to be able to charge anyone taxes.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)