Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Prototype
Items
Properties
All Categories
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Wiki editing manual
Philosophical Research
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Philosophical Research:RatingHub/YT/KimIversen
(section)
Project page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Motifs == {{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean"> {{li|I=S1/LR|tradition=LR|Q=618}}I don't fall in line when the line leads to bullshit (motto spotted on news channel) {{YouTube|@=UCoJTOwZxbvq8Al8Qat2zgTA}} -> if that isn't the most Liberal-republican thing I've ever heard. {{i|conform conform conform conform conform conform you're stupid you're stupid you're stupid for saying anything I don't already believe I don't think so I don't think so I don't think so I don't think so have you really seen all of them black-and-white thinking prejudices is that really always the way it is I don't think so I don't think so I don't think s— oh god where did I end up I don't believe in {{caps|That}} thing I am a reasonable rational person who only believes in sensible common sense things not Bad things you see so I always come to good decisions I don't think so I don't think so I don't think so extremist how could you ever think that way I don't think so I don't think so holy shit why is our president demanding to use LLMs to pilot military vehicles I didn't ask for that}}<br/> it's never the assemblages of people or the individual positions on issues that lead to Liberal-republicanism being doomed, it's... this thought process. whatever {{em|this}} is. {{li|I=S2/LR|tradition=LR|Q=618}}The government does not necessarily do what is ethical or moral <ref name="claude-unleashed"/> -> somewhat classic Liberal-republican line. sounds good on a typical day of center-Liberals and Tories until the anarchists and Gramscians show up with actual alternatives to building up to fascism and then all the Liberal-republicans get upset that things are actually changing because they can only imagine them "in balance" {{li|I=S2/LR|tradition=LR|Q=618}}If one business is milking the system then, strategically undercutting its prices, another business will surely out-exist it and make it go away <ref name="tariff"/> -> note the theme of the most powerful actor in the system crushing the others before the system can be reset or the "imbalance" "corrected".<br/> the pattern of Wal-Mart putting its prices way too low and driving out all the others and enjoying a monopoly is awfully, bizarrely similar in shape to the way things are "supposed" to work, if not perhaps the exact same shape.<br/> what if everyone was interpreting Liberal-republicanism wrong and every case of antitrust laws and supposed defeat of businesses that violate Arceism was actually just another case of a business becoming the most powerful and then using The State to eliminate the others in order to reset the system {{li|I=S2/PT|tradition=PT, Aa|Q=618}}United States society has undervalued fathers <ref name="drug-dad"/> -> Žižek said this once, so it can be marked psychoanalysis; it's not {{em|purely}} a Tory a thing. it {{em|is}} a total deepity though. like, you can't force fathers to stay with children. everything is individualized. it's the individual fathers getting divorces or walking out. so what the {{censor|hell}} are you going to do to them? {{li|I=S2/PT|tradition=PT|Q=618}}Global superpowers rise and fall in a 9-stage cycle (Ray Dalio) <ref name="dalio"/> -> one of the most darkly honest models anyone has ever had without endorsing war or genocide. not bad, really. </li></ol>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Philosophical Research may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar
free resource
.
Copyright is complete nonsense
, but people do have to buy items to be able to charge anyone taxes.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)