Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Prototype
Items
Properties
All Categories
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Philosophical Research
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Ontology:Q4941
(section)
Ontology
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Usage notes == === Combinations === * [[E:end of history|end of history]]: After Trotsky was assassinated, the prevailing philosophical position across most of the people of the First World has been that Trotsky was less bad than Stalin, and nobody can side with Stalin, but if Trotsky could not realize Trotskyism then it simply must be too hard to realize Bolshevism in the only way that would be acceptable, and thus it is not worth realizing Bolshevism whatsoever. Said another way, a great number of people passively believe that if there is no Trotskyism there is no socialist transition; if there is no Trotskyism then it is [[E:Bolshevism is over|the end]] of [[:Category:Historical materialism ontology|specific-sense materialist history]]. This is generally what is meant by "the end of history": the end of historical materialism, not the end of historical transitions. It is worth noting that different people give up at different points, choosing different named Marxisms as their arbitrary cutoff for the only possible Marxism. Some people will think it is the end of history because Gramsci in particular failed, or James P. Cannon failed; other people will think it is the end of history because Malcom X failed; yet other people might think it is the end of history because they could only ever believe in anarchism but they think anarchism has failed.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Philosophical Research may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar
free resource
.
Copyright is complete nonsense
, but people do have to buy items to be able to charge anyone taxes.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)