Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Prototype
Items
Properties
All Categories
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Philosophical Research
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Philosophical Research:Apocalypse Manual
(section)
Project page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== On printed books == In principle, printed books should be excellent at following Apocalypse Manual, and one of the most reliable repositories of information. A printed book requires no power beyond sufficient light to read it. A printed book can be preserved for decades without any electricity aside from any possible concerns about temperature changes. But in practice books are not all they're cracked up to be. Books take up physical space, which can be at a premium in a crisis situation. Homeless people have nowhere to put books, or very few places. Many people find their local libraries do not have space for the books they want to read, and they have to ship in books from some other city just to check them out from the library, or to buy them at the bookstore. Books have a critical problem that they are dreadfully inefficient β there are always more books than there is space to keep books, and there are always more books than there is time to sort through all the excess information contained in the great ocean of books spread across multiple cities and multiple countries to find the much smaller body of crucial information any particular individual or group of people is actually looking for. Here is the problem with books: it takes weeks, months, or years to solidly disprove an incorrect statement by finding the correct books, but it takes less than a day for somebody to spread misinformation to hundreds of thousands of people. Books cost money, but misinformation costs nothing. Books take time and effort to print and then to ship across an entire country area, but misinformation takes no physical effort to transport. If we want people to be properly informed, all the proper information needs to be instantly available at no charge <em>yesterday</em>. the surest repository of knowledge is one that is tiny and absolutely vast in how much information it can transport. it could well be the case that a cheap, replaceable digital device with indefinite access to battery power is superior to a collection of books. ------ core theme: everything should be maintainable by one person at a time, because when something fails, it's very likely there will be no more than one inexperienced individual to fix it [[Category:Policy guides]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Philosophical Research may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar
free resource
.
Copyright is complete nonsense
, but people do have to buy items to be able to charge anyone taxes.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)