Editing Ontology:Q19,77 (section)

== Motifs ==

<ol class="hue clean">
</li><li {{IS1/HAS/class}} value="618">subtribe  ->  I have not actually heard of this before. how do subtribes form? do smaller tribes merge together?
</li><li {{IS1/HAS/class}} value="618">village gods in tribal populations (p. 15-16)  ->  the motif of distinct polytheistic gods inside particular tribes.
</li><li {{IS1/HAS/class}} value="618">wars between Native Americans (p. 17)  ->  not to be used for value judgements against anarchism. Take It Seriously. however, it's worth it to characterize the scope and numbers of these as a matter of understanding plural populations. one thing I have to wonder: did <cite>Warriors</cite> jump to conclusions about how appropriate it is to characterize these as happening all the time? I think the tribal conflicts between the cats read as something more general, a projection of European tribes. but it's worth thinking about the historical patterns

</li><li {{IS1/PT/class}} value="618">"we must begin at the cradle to put a race beyond itself" / "We must begin at the cradle if we would conquer barbarism and lift a race to a height beyond itself" (Harry King, "The Indian Country", p. 27)  ->  the motif of United States people insisting on "reprogramming" people-groups that live in older kinds of civilizations. seems very familiar to what was said recently around the Afrikaners. people seem to not even care what form of "primitive culture" people actually have before they start trying to destroy it. there is nothing resembling the kind of effort Marxists go to to characterize different kinds of civilizations or populations before guessing what each one plausibly develops into let alone how it determines itself in that development.
</li></ol>