Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Prototype
Items
Properties
All Categories
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Philosophical Research
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Ontology:Q3331
(section)
Ontology
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Usage notes == As much as this has similarities to the "stupid idiot garbage trash" motifs, they represent different degrees of the same thing; this motif is a much more surface-level, less-intense kind of rejection. The "stupid idiot garbage trash" motifs are meant to suggest something that is fundamentally not tolerated and pushed away from some corner of society every time, while "anime, which is bad" is meant to apply to things that are about halfway tolerated and halfway rejected, often in strange ways. In some cases, "anime" is accepted precisely inside the social understanding that [[Ontology:Q3338|Japanese media are lesser than United States media if one can at all notice a distinction between the two]], or exoticized as if other countries [[redlink - essentialism|must perform a particular cultural identity]] to be accepted as adding something to another society. At other times the [[redlink - from within Japan|original context of a work is actually understood]], only to then degrade the work for reasons unrelated to where it came from, such as for being a piece of Young Adult fiction, being a highschool drama, including giant monsters, or being part of some particular "unappealing" category of genre fiction. Note that audiences degrading a work for objectifying women or girls does not count within this motif. This motif is only for "kid-friendly" reasons people reject anime and manga; "anime, which is for perverts" is a different motif entirely. However, this motif could apply to manga if everything is the same except the work is a printed book. === Wavebuilder combinations === * "Media literacy" is used in the context of viewing any piece of media in the full context of its genre, level of skill, and originating population or countable Culture if relevant. "Yes, <cite>Dragon Ball</cite> is dumb, but its ultimate purpose is to comment on <cite>Journey to the West</cite>." "Yes, <cite>Teen Titans</cite> is a shoddy copy of Japanese animation styles, but that is not relevant to discussing the themes and character arcs that would make someone want to watch it." [[Category:Otaku subculture ontology]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Philosophical Research may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar
free resource
.
Copyright is complete nonsense
, but people do have to buy items to be able to charge anyone taxes.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)