Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Prototype
Items
Properties
All Categories
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Wiki editing manual
Philosophical Research
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Ontology:Q73
(section)
Ontology
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Background == The Existentialist-Structuralist tradition is a purported group of philosophical frameworks claimed to exist by [[E:Q92|meta-Marxism]]. These philosophies all appear to be connected to each other by a particular set of shared themes, which is much more narrow than might otherwise be expected if they were in fact not related. These themes include "the subject" (existentialism), where language comes from and what effect it has (structuralist linguistics, poststructuralist frameworks), obsession with freedom and the capacity to do otherwise (existentialism, schizoanalysis, Foucauldianism), "your time" (Lacanian psychoanalysis, cybernetics), and reducing societal processes down to individual psychology (psychoanalysis, schizoanalysis at times). The thing that really identifies the Existentialist-Structuralist tradition is not simply seeing one of its associated themes, but the consistent quirk that finding one of them shortly leads to one of the others, as if none of them were actually separate. It is currently unknown if critical theory is fully contained within the Existentialist-Structuralist tradition. Due to its connections with poststructuralist frameworks it would appear to overlap with the tradition at least partially. Another uncertain philosophy is Kantian ethics. This is thought to be a precursor to the Existentialist-Structuralist tradition but not formally part of it. There is a particular period of early Liberal-republican thought in the Enlightenment which is distinguishable as Liberal-republicanism, and far after that, there is a break around the time critical theory appears where the Existentialist-Structuralist tradition appears to start. Capital-E Existentialism appears to exist within a period in which the social sciences shifted from large scales toward small scales and began spawning smaller-scale political theories which did not operate the same way as traditional Liberal-republican theory. In terms of hypotheses about why the Existentialist-Structuralist tradition would have come to exist, one possible hypothesis is that Existentialism is created when anarchists attempt to get into academia and create theories useful to anarchism, but all of the theories simply get co-opted and absorbed back into Liberal-republicanism as its own set of fully-compatible small scale models.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Philosophical Research may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar
free resource
.
Copyright is complete nonsense
, but people do have to buy items to be able to charge anyone taxes.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)