Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Prototype
Items
Properties
All Categories
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Philosophical Research
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Philosophical Research:Data model
(section)
Project page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Ontological-category Items == === S0 Concepts === logical or metaphysical categories which group Z or S items === Z0 Physical Patterns === Z0 Patterns represent generic versions of Z Items which one can expect to be instantiated as some kind of spacetime-unique object or identifiable instance. For example, one Z0 Item could conceivably be "cat of species <i>Felis catus</i>", and its corresponding Z/Z1 Item could be a highly notable individual cat, while at the same time, Items in the S dimension mirror this Z0-to-Z1 relationship with the S0 Item "fictional cat" and the S1 Item "Graystripe". Equally, a Z Item could be used to mark a real-world phenomenon which seemingly cannot be generalized despite recurring often, such as a Z Item for "quantum mechanics (study)". Despite there being many papers about quantum mechanics, there is not necessarily any such thing as a drop-in replacement through the study of some different kind of physics. Even so, there could still conceivably be a Z0 Pattern for "academic study of physics" which instantiates itself as "quantum mechanics (study)" and "thermodynamics (study)". === Other kinds of "zero" categories === It is unlikely, though maybe possible, for there to be more "0" categories introduced. "M0" is a potential candidate, for some sort of generic repeatable category of questions that keeps instantiating itself into new versions of a particular kind of question. One possible example of an M0 Item is "National questions"; in concept, every group of people that eventually becomes a nation-state has a national question. There are no F0 Concepts because of the way in which the inherently arbitrary nature of some S0 classifications for S1 or S2 Items makes it impossible to identify "objectively wrong" categories. At one point an "H0" category was considered for historically-contingent grouping objects that have no particular rationale for why they are the way they are today, but with time this was simply flattened back into "Z".
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Philosophical Research may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar
free resource
.
Copyright is complete nonsense
, but people do have to buy items to be able to charge anyone taxes.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)