Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Prototype
Items
Properties
All Categories
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Philosophical Research
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Ontology:Q1061
(section)
Ontology
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Toki pona but with Egyptian === Given that the rules of this language are not fully fixed to the standard rules of the base language and the point is instead to create a simplified language, it would theoretically be possible to take an ancient language with a great amount of information recovered about it and simply start writing in a "pona" version of that language. In a case like this, the writing system does not have to be especially easy to remember as long as the spoken representation of the sentence is appropriately simple. As long as there is a small number of words and it does not take long to learn the spoken grammar it is perfectly acceptable to write sentences in hieroglyphs, especially if using some kind of elaborate writing system somehow makes the meaning of a statement clearer. [[Category:Constructed languages ontology]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Philosophical Research may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar
free resource
.
Copyright is complete nonsense
, but people do have to buy items to be able to charge anyone taxes.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)