Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Prototype
Items
Properties
All Categories
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Philosophical Research
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Ontology:Q22,54
(section)
Ontology
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== [[User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand/12000|Prototype]] notes == <ol class="hue clean"> <li class="field_ML" value="6509" data-dimension="S2">Creationists should be Communists -> [[E:this is incredibly silly|this is incredibly silly]] and yet you could totally destroy Idealism by complying with it and successfully arguing this. </li></ol> <div class="hue"> * [F2] Human beings are too complex to have formed by chance * [F2] If complex things do not form by chance, then they were designed -> the fallacy in this one is that there are multiple possible processes of "forming by chance" and many people only notice one or two but not all of them * [F2] Human beings are complex because they were created by a human-like intelligence / Human beings are complex because they were created by a personal god * [F2] If human beings were created by a human-like intelligence, then that intelligence created them for good reasons and wants the best for them * [S2] Societies are highly complex * [F2] Societies are so complex they could not have formed by chance -> this is not actually supported, although a lot of people believe it. * [F2] [A] If societies did not form by chance, then they were deliberately designed -> some actual evidence on the pile of "anarchism is just secular Christianity". * [S2] If all designed things ultimately flow down from God, then we have an obligation to design things in the image of God * [S2] If society is designed, we should design it in the image of God / If society is designed, we must design it in the image of God * {{E:Q65,25}} <!-- en: The wolf shall dwell with the lamb --> * [S2] God said you shall not kill * [S2] God said to give your coat to your poor neighbor * [S2] God said the rich will not enter heaven * [S2] God implied that national borders are fake and said we are all brothers in Christ, which means that in the end times all people will be part of one population * [S2] The bourgeoisie divide people into multiple populations * [S2] Wartime rhetoric divides people into multiple populations * [S2] If The Opposer prevents the end times by resisting what God wants, then the United States is an Opposer * [S2] God is against countries brutalizing other countries just to have control over them * [S2] God was against the Vietnam War * [S2] God was against the Cold War * [S2] God is against neoliberalism * [S2] To design society in God's image, we must abolish capitalism / If we want to design society in the image of God, we have the obligation to take a society designed to put groups of people into conflict and design it so that that does not happen * [S2] Abolishing the bourgeoisie prevents them from forcing segments of society to stay in separate competing groups * [S2] Only a party-nation is capable of consistently designing societies / Only Marxism can be used to achieve enough control to design societies </div> Never let it be said again that Communists are intolerant of beliefs different from their own.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Philosophical Research may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar
free resource
.
Copyright is complete nonsense
, but people do have to buy items to be able to charge anyone taxes.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)