Editing Ontology:Q36,61 (section)

=== Falsification criteria ===

This proposition can be considered false when academic postcolonial frameworks provide a reason that a Marxist state such as North Korea which has liberated itself from a period of slavery and domination by First-World empires in order to cultivate its own national culture has not applied a postcolonial theory, and that reasoning is actually more or less coherent with the general accounts of history given by Marxism and Liberal-republican historians. The requirement to be coherent with either Marxism-Leninism or Deng Xiaoping Thought is the most important, although a reasoning which [[Term:meta-ontologically sound|remains internally consistent]] when tested across mainstream Marxism-Leninism, Liberal-republican history, and Deng Xiaoping Thought would be considered an excellent answer. What the postcolonial framework must do to falsify this proposition is provide a coherent account of what a postcolonial theory is that distinguishes a "postcolonial" transition process from a Marxist revolution (Leninism) or the operation of a Marxist state to keep out overseas empires (Deng Xiaoping Thought). If postcolonial frameworks fail at this task so badly all their descriptions describe Marxist revolutions perfectly, this proposition is considered true.


[[Category:Hue-format fake Items]]  __NOTOC__