Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Prototype
Items
Properties
All Categories
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Philosophical Research
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Ontology:Q22,30
(section)
Ontology
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Usage notes == === Item label === United States people become furious at the prospect of being called "Liberalism" or "Liberals" with the attempt to assign these terms a negative meaning. There is a certain deeply-ingrained mythos that "[[Term:liberalism|liberalism]]" can only refer to the state of taking any kind of country population and making it better and <em>more free</em>, and thus any progressive [[E:assigned liberal at birth|must definitionally be a "liberal"]] and every progressive ideology must definitionally be part of the same population which must not violate the rules of the United States constitution but must not be insulted. Due to this, Item labels usually refer to the system of Liberalism as "Liberal-republicanism" to make the two terms distinct in spoken language, or go one step further and refer only to "center-Liberals" or "Liberal-republicans" as a demographic identity. Assuming first that the rest of the statement is neutral rather than charged, these kind of "identity" statements may be less likely to be taken as negative statements, given that there has been a particular increasing bias across the United States toward the concept of <i>identities being a universally good thing as long as identities choose to get along</i>. It is a particularly [[:Category:Existentialist-Structuralist tradition|Existentialist]] thing to insist that every social problem can be solved precisely by focusing on the humanity of human individuals through [[E:We are all the subject|emphasizing the fact that individuals exist at all]] and all identities are baked into living, breathing, experiencing individuals. Nonetheless, any method that successfully [[LG:SCP|makes proposition meanings more intuitive]] in spite of the steep character limit on proposition labels is acceptable.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Philosophical Research may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar
free resource
.
Copyright is complete nonsense
, but people do have to buy items to be able to charge anyone taxes.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)