Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Prototype
Items
Properties
All Categories
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Philosophical Research
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Ontology:Q36,03
(section)
Ontology
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Motifs (subjective) === <ol class="hue clean"> </li><li {{IS2/MX/class}} value="618">Atheist science communicators are social-science illiterate / You can't understand science illiteracy without a serious <em>science</em> of sociality, social groups, and culture </li><li {{IS1/MX/class}} value="618" data-pages="26">who are "we"? -> in DHW, it appears to be "professors and capitalists", while capitalists have no incentive to let professors have primary control over "we". </li><li {{IS2/ES/class}} data-dimension="M3" value="618" data-pages="30">Do people desire survival over sovereignty? / you can pray or you can inoculate (statement on effectiveness of science versus magic ritual) -> I feel like we really got a pile of strange data on this during <b class="caps">Covid</b>. there were a bunch of people who really seemed not to desire surviving as much as creating a materially independent Confederate culture, which religion served the purposes of but vaccines produced by somebody else didn't. in a lesser way which is nowhere near as bad, there were a couple incidents where people in Africa rejected science and promoted folk religion because ultimately they wanted populational independence and the chance to develop things in Africa, they were just a little mistaken about what kinds of things those might be. </li></ol>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Philosophical Research may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar
free resource
.
Copyright is complete nonsense
, but people do have to buy items to be able to charge anyone taxes.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)