Editing Philosophical Research:Rating Hub (section)

=== Agenda questions ===

* Could this description or argument be used to argue for shooting Black people to death to "protect" the people of United States towns? ("George Floyd test")
* Could this description or argument be used to argue for invading Vietnam? ("Vietnam test")
** A test that many anticommunist fables and propositions attempting to talk about "utopias" fail.
* Could this description or argument be used to argue for inadvertently shattering China into multiple countries? ("Three Chinas test")
** This test mostly applies to works claiming to clear up misconceptions about China that just make things more confusing.
** This test squeaks by the "signs test" on the merit that it can be used to mark works "U / Unknown" due to the sheer creation of contradictory narratives between multiple people. No need to worry about whether individual members of the audience care about having an accurate picture of China or hate China, because obfuscating the story around China violates the principle of giving accurate factual accounts of recent history.