Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Prototype
Items
Properties
All Categories
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Philosophical Research
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand
(section)
User page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
User contributions
Logs
View user groups
Special pages
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== L900 - L999 meaningful names === <ol start="900" class="hue clean start_nine-hundred"> <li class="field_mdem" value="900" data-dimension="L">we / our -> the real version of we/our, with every possible significance <ol><li>most basic and common definition </li><li>(Existentialism, center-Liberalism) every individual human being on earth in unison </li><li>each of every local set of connected members of particular separate groups in unison </li><li>every individual human being on earth in parallel but separately </li><li>each of every local set of connected members of particular separate groups in parallel but separately </li><li>the followers of any particular ideology to the exclusion of anybody outside that ideology, possibly presented as the only human beings who exist; may be synonymous with a particular localized Left's definition of "The Left" / "progressivism" as a national-scale phenomenon </li><li>(mainstream Marxism-Leninism) members of the proletariat and the greater subpopulation of Communist allies </li><li>(right-Liberalism, Toryism) used ironically to mock Bolshevism by suggesting all "I" statements have morphed into "we" statements said by the nation as a unified whole. see <cite>Anthem</cite> (if I remember right); see "socialicizing the people"; see r/AccidentalCommunism </li><li>(MDem) used ironically to mock Liberalism by suggesting that an accurate "we" statement within the conditions of Liberalism should be hyper-pluralized to reflect the real-world situation of "we" never belonging to a single unified group of humans and always belonging to separate localized groups. see "[[Philosophical_Research:Molecular_Democracy/5.2/1019_ours-democracies|ours groups]]" entry </li></ol> </li><li class="field_exstruct" value="901" data-dimension="L">we / ours -> the nightmare hyper-pluralized version of we/our depicted in "[[Philosophical_Research:Molecular_Democracy/5.2/1019_ours-democracies|ours groups]]", used to show "how" to inflect it in different situations if the Lexeme template can accommodate this. look over and adequately finish the inflections for all 900 previous Lexemes before attempting this one. that will probably provide clues of how to do this </li><li class="" value="902" data-dimension="L">they (impersonal pronoun) </li><li class="" value="903" data-dimension="L">they (personal pronoun) -> to be used for character Signifiers </li><li class="" value="904" data-dimension="L">he (personal pronoun) -> to be used for character Signifiers </li><li class="" value="905" data-dimension="L">she (personal pronoun) -> to be used for character Signifiers </li><li class="field_geo" value="906" data-dimension="L">pronoun <ol><li>common definition - a part of speech which is substituted for another noun </li><li>any descriptive noun which takes the place of another common noun or name - impersonal pronoun </li><li>preferred pronoun </li><li>(Toryism) supposedly improper or unexpected attempt to prescribe language usage; see "politics", "heresy", "freedom (Existentialism)" </li></ol> </li><li class="" value="907" data-dimension="L">it -> to be used for fictional object / character Signifiers </li><li class="" value="908" data-dimension="L"><span lang="ja">私(わたし)([https://manabitimes.jp/english/2484 代名詞])</span> -> to be used for character Signifiers </li><li class="" value="909" data-dimension="L"><span lang="ja">あたし(代名詞)</span> </li><li class="" value="910" data-dimension="L"><span lang="ja">俺(オレ)(代名詞)</span> / <span lang="ja">オラ(代名詞)</span> </li><li class="" value="911" data-dimension="L"><span lang="ja">僕(ぼく)(代名詞)</span> -> honestly I've always been confused why there are two male pronouns but not two female pronouns </li><li class="" value="912" data-dimension="L"><span lang="ja">俺様(オレさま)(代名詞)</span> / I think there are equivalents </li><li class="" value="913" data-dimension="L"><span lang="ja">わし([https://kotonohaweb.net/first-person/ 代名詞])</span> -> this is the old people pronoun isn't it? that's what I half remember </li><li value="917" class="field_ML" data-dimension="L">comrade (impersonal pronoun) -> in practice, mainly used to refer to audiences of Marxist texts; still, this can technically go in the pronouns section for some Marxist theorists who fit the category or get addressed as "Comrade —" </li><li class="" value="926" data-dimension="L">Joseph / José <ol><li>a general-use name </li><li>name used in the Christian bible </li><li>Joseph as Stalin-follower name </li></ol> </li><li value="927" class="" data-dimension="L">Martin <ol><li>a general-use name </li><li>(unattested) Martin as phenomenologist name </li><li>Martin as schizophrenia-(schizoanalysis-term) -> Petscop, Tapers </li></ol> </li><li class="" value="928" data-dimension="L">Felix <ol><li>a general-use name </li><li>Felix or Guattari as schizoanalyst name </li></ol> </li><li class="" value="929" data-dimension="L">?? <ol><li>a general-use name </li><li>Deleuze as schizoanalyst name </li></ol> </li><li class="" value="930" data-dimension="L">Theodore / Theo <ol><li>a general-use name </li><li>Theodore as center-Liberal name </li></ol> </li><li class="" value="931" data-dimension="L">Michael / Mike <ol><li>a general-use name </li><li>name used in the Christian bible </li><li>Mike as Bakuninist name </li></ol> </li><li class="" value="932" data-dimension="L">Peter / Pete <ol><li>a general-use name </li><li>name used in the Christian bible </li><li>Peter as Kropotkinist name </li></ol> </li><li class="field_ML" value="939" data-dimension="L">Karl / Carl as Marxist name </li><li class="field_trotsky" value="940" data-dimension="L">Leo / Lev as Trotskyist name </li><li class="field_trotsky" value="941" data-dimension="L">Rosa / Rose as Trotskyist name </li><li class="field_trotsky" value="942" data-dimension="L">Greg as Trotskyist name </li><li class="field_geo" value="949" data-dimension="L">Newton / Newtonian -> classical physics </li><li class="field_geo" value="950" data-dimension="L">Einstein / Einsteinian -> relativistic physics </li><li class="field_geo" value="952" data-dimension="L">Everett / Everettian -> please just say many-worlds. this isn't one of those terms that makes me angry but, the opacity </li><li class="field_geo" value="953" data-dimension="L">Lagrange / Lagrangian -> mathematical object or operation; aren't there also other Lagrange things named for the same guy. yes, there are Lagrangian multipliers, and Lagrangian several other things </li><li class="field_geo" value="954" data-dimension="L">Hamilton / Hamiltonian -> mathematical object or operation; equivocates with Alexander Hamilton depending on the context </li><li class="field_geo" value="960" data-dimension="L">Gramsci / Gramscian </li><li class="field_geo" value="961" data-dimension="L">Marcuse / Marcusean </li><li class="number_empty" value="965" data-dimension="L">maybe some theorist names which really need inflections? Gramsci/Gramscian/Gramscianism, Ted Grant/??/??, etc </li><li value="966" data-remark="Ultraman" class="field_fantasy" data-dimension="L"><span lang="ja">怪獣(かいじゅう)</span> -> "monster" as defined in the Japanese language. continue [[Philosophical_Research:Schizophrenic_point_of_view|SPoV]], but only with faction-meanings that would conceivably be sensical and recognizable to a native Japanese speaker: faction-meanings might include big kaiju in rubber-suit shows versus small kaiju in animation, etc. </li><li value="976" class="field_fantasy" data-dimension="L">[[User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand/inflections|Vegeta (impersonal pronoun)]] -> half-jokingly, half-seriously, but rather extensively used in MDem 5.2 drafts </li><li class="field_fantasy" value="977" data-dimension="L"><span lang="ja">ドラゴンボール</span> / Dragon Ball -> category: work citation phrase; work citations dictionary (qww). I considered having two separate Lexemes but for citation-phrase entries there is just no good reason for that when the lemma field and Senses can both be localized into multiple "real" languages </li><li class="field_fantasy" value="978" data-dimension="L"><span lang="ja">ドラゴンボール超</span> / <span lang="ja">ドラゴンボールスーパー</span> / Dragon Ball Super -> work citations dictionary (qww) </li><li value="983" class="" data-dimension="L">Clara / Klara -> this name is in like, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9TBsoiDTIU every] [http://www.secretvictorianist.com/2018/06/the-origins-of-coppelia.html story] about robot kids <ol><li>a general-use name </li><li>Clara as used in <cite>The Sandman</cite> </li><li>Clara as used in <cite>Five Nights at Freddy's</cite> </li><li>Klara as used in <cite>Klara and the Sun</cite> </li></ol> </li><li class="field_trotsky" value="983" data-remark="the original Leninism!" data-dimension="L">Trotsky / Trotskyist / Trotskyite -> for covering the difference between "Trotskyite conspiracy" and "Trotskyism" </li><li class="field_ML" value="984" data-dimension="L">Stalin / Stalinist / Stalinism / Stalin follower / Stalin-follower -> for covering the difference between "Stalinism" and "Stalin Thought" </li><li class="field_trotsky" value="985" data-dimension="L">[[Ontology:L985|Zinoviev / Zinovievism]] / Zinovievist / Grigori Zinoviev levels of tired and done -> MDem term for Trotskyite-conspiracy ideologies; historically, also used to mean other things which would be worth recording here </li><li value="989" class="field_geo" data-dimension="L">Urvogel -> Archaeopteryx's common name. separate lexeme because it could refer to different objects than <i>A. lithographica</i>. </li><li value="990" class="field_geo" data-dimension="L">Archaeopteryx lithographica / A. lithographica / Archaeopteryx sp. / Archaeopteryx </li><li value="991" class="field_geo" data-dimension="L">Tyrannosaurus rex / T. rex / Tyrannosaurus sp. / Tyrannosaurus / T-Rex / T-rex </li><li value="992" class="field_geo" data-dimension="L">Litho<i>graph</i>ica -> link to Items for Sun Wukong, undirected graph, and <i>A. lithographica</i>. doesn't have contrasting definitions, but as it's a name for the project gets a special status that way </li><li value="999" class="field_geo" data-dimension="L">Linnaeus / L. -> Lexeme for "L." citation placed after binomial names, as in <span class="address" style="display: inline;"><i>Pica pica</i> (Linnaeus, 1758)</span> or <span class="address" style="display: inline;"><i>Hyacinthoides italica</i> (L.)</span> </li><li value="1000" data-remark="gotta keep up plurality having a big number" class="field_mdem" data-dimension="L">plurality / plural -> category: static process term (concrete-noun-based) </li></ol>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Philosophical Research may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar
free resource
.
Copyright is complete nonsense
, but people do have to buy items to be able to charge anyone taxes.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)