Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Prototype
Items
Properties
All Categories
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Philosophical Research
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Philosophical Research:Data model
(section)
Project page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== S2 Statements === An S2 Statement is a proposition which groups objects or concepts and the semantic relationships between them into definite claims. The simplest kind of S2 Statement is a declarative claim assigning one thing to be the same as another: <strong>Golden Freddy</strong> <i>is</i> <strong>Cassidy</strong>. If there is considerable doubt that this claim is an objective fact about something that everyone can verify or confirm, it should not be casually put on a specific Z1 or S1 Item as if it is physical reality. At the same time, if a particular claim has been repeated many times, the claim is fully worth recording as its own entity β an entity we know as <i>a possibly-true but uncertain claim</i>. An S2 Statement can be an unproved mathematics conjecture, a scientific hypothesis, a fan theory about a fictional media series, a philosophical or ideological statement which is difficult to scientifically substantiate at the present time, a truly unfalsifiable statement made up to troll philosophers which still probably can be broken down into other statements that characterize what it is, a popular conspiracy theory, or any number of other possible kinds of statements which assert something to be true either in the real world or some hypothetical space. In the case of conspiracy theories and harmful reactionary beliefs, it is advisable that the statement be worded in the way that least promotes belief in the statement, such that it becomes obvious that the content of the entry will be focused on showing in what verifiable ways it is not true. Any especially debunked statement may be classified as an F2 Statement.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Philosophical Research may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar
free resource
.
Copyright is complete nonsense
, but people do have to buy items to be able to charge anyone taxes.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)