Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Prototype
Items
Properties
All Categories
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Philosophical Research
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Ontology:Q5440
Ontology
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean compound"><li> <onlyinclude><dfn class="field_exstruct manual" data-dimension="F2" data-qid="5440" data-numbersign="200" data-field="" data-series="" data-work="" data-chapter="" data-tale="" data-object="" data-note="" data-lexeme="">{{IF2}}[[Ontology:Q5440|When two people have information, everybody has it]]</dfn></onlyinclude> __NOTOC__ </li></ol><!-- duplication hint: copy fake Item from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN|Ontology:Q5440]] --> == Core characteristics == <dl class="wikitable hue"> {{HueClaim|P=item type| F2 }} {{HueRoster|P=label (en)| {{Ontology:Q5440}} }} {{HueClaim|P=alias (en)| When information is available to a few people, it's available to everyone | When two people know something, everybody knows it | One person listening is equivalent to the entire population or country (spread of information) | printing press fallacy }} {{HueClaim|P=alias (en)| If one million people have watched Dragon Ball, then there must not be a single person who hasn't watched or read it | Literally everybody must know about the coke and mentos reaction }} {{HueRoster|P=QID references| printing press | approximate historical date }} {{HueRoster|P=color swatch references| Existentialist-Structuralist tradition }} {{HueClaim|P=instance of| Difference-Existentialist model? | physically-incorrect statement | physically-incorrect statement which would be correct if framed differently }} {{HueClaim|P=[[User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand|prototype]] notes| dreadfully common in every single discussion of "culture" and "prejudice". in fact, it's vastly more common to find people who believe this than people who don't. but, it's demonstrably untrue in the physical world. ... }} </dl> == Wavebuilder combinations == <dl class="wikitable hue data_wavebuild"> {{WaveBuild| [S2] No individual object moves faster than a photon | {{Ontology:Q5441}} }} <!-- en: WITH ?? PRODUCES ?? --> {{WaveBuild| [S2] Information cannot reach a "collective unconscious" without communication | {{Ontology:Q5441}} }} </dl> == Usage notes == This is one of many cases of a very subtle type of error which is easily missed or identified incorrectly when people do not distinguish exactly what kind of error it is. The "printing press fallacy" is not a statement against the possibility of information which has gotten to two people <em>ever</em> getting to millions of people; however unlikely, there is always some probability of little-known information or claims spreading. Instead, the "printing press fallacy" is the fallacy that <em>every single possible</em> communication of information to someone acts as a printing press. This is the fallacy that when one highly-specific [[redlink - queer theory|queer theorist]]'s paper is published in an inaccessible private journal every reactionary will spontaneously know the contents of the paper without having to hear of it or obtain it. This is the fallacy that one person tweeting about a bad experience at work will spontaneously cause every human being on earth to internalize the dangers of workplace misogyny and also somehow create from whole cloth and internalize solutions. This is the fallacy that information spreads by telepathy or some unknown method many times more efficient than telepathy, rather than always having to experience logistics because every piece of information must actually be communicated between individuals. However ironic this may be when psychoanalysis contains many of its own fallacies, Lacanianism has a brilliant statement <em>against</em> this fallacy. In having to examine the physical applicability of Jung's concept of the [[redlink|collective unconscious]] to the real world, Lacanians came up with a model that people only accept ideas after the process of communication between human beings through signifiers alienated from the individual who said them. There are many further fine details within this model that make it dubious, but overall, the statement that human beings communicate through exchanging signifiers is true. If human beings exchange information through signifiers which can be misinterpreted along the way, it should be clear that there are obstacles that stand in the way of information instantaneously making it all the way from a few individuals to everyone, and these obstacles can be non-trivial, or even completely prohibitive. Keep this in mind: if you can find anyone on earth who has not heard of some particular thing, from the story of <cite>Dragon Ball</cite> to Frantz Fanon's postcolonial theories, then you know that information does not spread instantaneously, and you know that at any given time there will be many, many more people who have not heard of something. == Use in thesis portals == <dl class="wikitable hue data_motifs"> {{HueRoster|P=appears in work| {{Ontology:Q19195}} |OP=with connotation| incorrect statement }} </dl> [[Category:F2 Factually-Devoid Claims]] [[Category:Existential materialism ontology]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Philosophical Research may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar
free resource
.
Copyright is complete nonsense
, but people do have to buy items to be able to charge anyone taxes.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Templates used on this page:
Template:HueCSS
(
edit
)
Template:HueClaim
(
edit
)
Template:HueRoster
(
edit
)
Template:IF2
(
edit
)
Template:IP0
(
edit
)
Template:IS2
(
edit
)
Template:TTS
(
edit
)
Template:TTS/aural
(
edit
)
Template:WaveBuild
(
edit
)
Template:WaveBuilt
(
edit
)
Template:WaveScore
(
edit
)
Ontology:P145
(
edit
)
Ontology:P153
(
edit
)
Ontology:Q19195
(
edit
)
Ontology:Q54,41
(
edit
)
Ontology:Q5440
(
edit
)
Ontology:Q5441
(
edit
)