Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Prototype
Items
Properties
All Categories
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Philosophical Research
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Philosophical Research:Main Page
Project page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
Ever heard of a game where you add any two concepts together?<br /> You [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_Craft probably] [https://weekly.wordiverse.com/p/landmarks-within-a-dream have]. But, what if the game actually made sense? What if, you know, it was actually based on the [[Philosophical Research:MDem/4.3/6951 plus|interactions of the objects involved]] instead of turning every combination of two terms into a bad pun? LLMs can't do that. Not in an era where computers can render entire rooms of objects with different simulated materials through collision boxes and raytracing. The problem? At any given moment, language is [[redlink - Gรถdel's incompleteness theorem|inherently static]]. [[redlink|Language can never touch grass]]. Language can never actually go outside and test itself against the world. Ask a book a question and all it can practically do is respond with what terms or concepts are strongly connected to other arbitrary concepts. But what if we were to fix only two things about language? Get rid of the words. Get rid of the rigid connections. Now what is left is an empty beaker in which nameless yet meaningful lumps of stuff constantly run into each other and connect in only the ways that make sense. When the drops trace understandable paths into bigger things we write them down. If the paths are a bit wrong we run the reactions again. Seed. Caryopsis. Stalk. Chlorophyll. Grass. Keep the paths going, keep the [[redlink - ontology|local graphs of concepts]] in [[redlink - meta-ontologically sound|interaction with each other]], and before you know it, a simple net of lines on paper <em>can</em> touch grass. It only requires the [[redlink - scientific method|willingness to learn]], in the way language itself cannot. Litho<em>graph</em>ica is three things: a catalog of [[:Category:Hue-format fake Items|signifiers and objects]], a [[:Category:Thesis portals|research notebook]], and an old-school [[:Category:Wavebuilder ontology|simulation]] of discovery processes and philosophies. The word "processes" in the plural is important โ every reasonable route to land at one thing from another which feels worth noting is traced through separately. Different tracks of reasoning are coded into different parallel [[:Category:S2 Double-Signifying Statements|propositions]]; different philosophies or fields of knowledge may be coded in [[:Category:Item colors ontology|different colors]]. Everything begins with one big, weird treasure hunt to find particular motifs and observations that really matter. You pin them up on a board. You break seemingly-simple units down into constellations of smaller dots and begin connecting the dots. You make several constellations into a bigger constellation. Ultimately, you will learn not just <em>how to</em> reason, but how all of us <em>already</em> reason, and how each of those forms of reasoning part from properly understanding the ongoing tumult of objects and processes they came out of. You may be surprised at how precise the processes of language can be if only they were [[redlink - ontological model / physics equation?|used for good]]. But when things get tough, or you simply want a break to make things the way you want to, you can also [[redlink - Wavebuilder dictionary|create your own graph file]] with anything in it. Analyze the rhetorical or narrative structure of existing works, or put up your own speculative "thesis" consisting of articles, essays, or short stories where the purpose of your maps is not to get lost. Or do both. Sometimes this thing is a tool. Sometimes it's an [[User:Reversedragon/Wavebuilder/2505-17 intro|educational game]]. Sometimes it's a glorified bibliography where the sources that would go at the bottom of a Wikipedia page steal the spotlight and make you actually go read. This thing is not here to lecture you with one big waterfall of [[redlink - S1 don't cite Wikipedia|sometimes chewed-up statements]] a bunch of experts over in some hidden tower somewhere once said, it's here for the actual messy process of learning. (With a tiny side of [[User:Reversedragon/Wavebuilder/2410-22 wave-score|spreadsheets]].) Combine [[redlink - dragon|fire with lizard]], combine [[redlink - London Fog|milk with tea]], combine [[Ontology:Q819|set theory with the axiom of choice]], combine <cite>Dragon Ball</cite> with workers' movement to get galactic Trotskyism. The future is in your hands. You only have to take up [[redlink - Promethean task|your torch]] and [[:Category:Historical materialism ontology (general-sense)|find it]]. == Ontology project (Main / Ontology:) == * [[User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand]] - Items/Lexemes prototype, from Q1 to approximately Q12000 ** [[Special:NamespaceInfo]] [[Special:Search]] - namespace debug * [[Philosophical Research:Properties/Numeric|Properties]] - characteristics used to add information to Items * Ontology pages ** [[:Category:Fake Item lists]] ** [[:Category:Hue-format fake Items]] ** https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Links - saving to put on a Help: page == Thesis portals == * [[:Category:Thesis portals]] - landings for collected research notes or writings * [[Philosophical Research:Molecular Democracy drafts]] - the first thesis portal to exist, which was/is used to inspire Ontology entries and test the site * [[User:Vidak|Vidak's corner]] (user page) ** Substack articles - [[:Category:The Subtle Dialectician]] ** The People's Permacomputer Project - [[Philosophical_Research:The_People's_Permacomputer_Project]] *** Phase Three Results - [[Philosophical_Research:PPP_Phase_3_Results]] == Extensions that need to be installed or enabled == * [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Details details/summary] - unsure whether hiding Properties with Gadgets is a better idea * [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Extension:HTML_Tags HTML Tags] - enable <code><section></code> tag * Recover data from Properties ** (Wikibase is slated to be removed when the Entity data is recovered, which will simplify the rest of the setup) [[Category:Top]] <!-- site change log, added in change summary: nginx file now updated with ability to look up articles or Items under /entry/ -->
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Philosophical Research may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar
free resource
.
Copyright is complete nonsense
, but people do have to buy items to be able to charge anyone taxes.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)