Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Prototype
Items
Properties
All Categories
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Philosophical Research
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
User:Reversedragon/Wavebuilder/2505-17 intro
User page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
User contributions
Logs
View user groups
Special pages
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{BopCSS}}<div class="bop top bottom"><h3><time datetime="2025-05-17T02:00Z">25-05</time></h3> <div class="bop-text">so. the ontology project wiki. tentatively named LithoGRAPHica. it takes a little bit to explain, but I'm going to try my best. The basic concept is that it's kind of one big bank of propositions and literary motifs, as well as "real" things that are building up to a kind of evolving Marxist ontology of the world and of history (and also of how fiction reflects those two things) I did say this was going to be a lot. It all started when I was messing with [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_Craft this LLM game where you could combine things] and I was like, there's definitely a better way to do this the combinations on Infinite Craft were like, not even good a lot of times they didn't make sense so the puzzle became working <em>against</em> the AI to get to things and I said to myself, the problem with this is language models don't model physics. but a "model of language" honestly could do physics if it wanted to. humans can say a physics equation in a sentence, etc. so what if one made a game like this but it was based on physical things and concepts instead of words and this led to wavebuilder Wavebuilder was this: an ontology game, not too complicated, where you could combine Things two at a time, and there would be a dictionary text file of all the combinations leading to different things. there was meant to be this dynamic where anyone could make their own dictionaries to suit their own creative projects or puzzle ideas and explore different results things could produce. it was all in Lisp on a terminal, and I was trying to make the code as simple and as straightforward as possible there was also something called a [[User:Reversedragon/Wavebuilder/2410-22 wave-score|wave score]] where when you combined elements it'd do arithmetic to give you a proxy of how complex or hard to make the concept was There's only one reason I talk about Wavebuilder in the past tense: it's on hiatus like many coding projects I was working on part of it and hit a wall and just couldn't get back to it but when I have this wiki fully set up, I do want to return to it So I had Wavebuilder bouncing around in my head I was really thinking about the concept that any linguistic sign was like a kind of mathematical equation, of z = f(x,y) and that you could describe many simple interactions of physical objects as math problems: [[Philosophical Research:MDem/4.3/6951 plus|apple + knife = apple slices]] Then one day I was like what if there was a TV Tropes but for Marxist philosophy so you pick out motifs like "magical universe became depressingly non-magical" or "galactic empire" or propositions, as in general philosophical statements but instead of just naming motifs you actually try to analyze them a bit, so people learn something and I discovered that dovetailed really well with the concept of Wavebuilder elements and wave scores as a kind of basic default Wavebuilder dictionary you could combine two concepts and it could be a proposition or combine two propositions and get a concept using them as assumptions it also opened the floodgates for silly and unlikely combinations of academic and normal things kind of [[:Category:Alfred Jarry ontology|Alfred Jarry]] style but while it could be silly and fun it could also be serious the proposition pages could be used to present parallel hypotheses or different parallel ideologies and investigate which statements were "truer", or at least easier to substantiate I started this thing as a tool for understanding what's true in order to write [[Philosophical Research:Molecular Democracy drafts|my "serious" Marxist philosophy book]] to help me and others cut through capitalist bullshit in existing philosophy texts. but it's almost as much an educational game as it is that </div></div> <div class="bop-foot"> <dl class="bop-meta"> {{BopRev|Philosophical Research:Main Page}} <!-- ; -->{{BopComment}} {{BopCreated|2025-05-17T02:00Z}} {{BopHandle|2505-17_intro}} </dl></div><!-- -->[[Category:Wavebuilder]] __NOTOC__
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Philosophical Research may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar
free resource
.
Copyright is complete nonsense
, but people do have to buy items to be able to charge anyone taxes.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Templates used on this page:
Template:BopAliasE
(
edit
)
Template:BopCSS
(
edit
)
Template:BopComment
(
edit
)
Template:BopCreated
(
edit
)
Template:BopFooter/time
(
edit
)
Template:BopHandle
(
edit
)
Template:BopRev
(
edit
)