Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Prototype
Items
Properties
All Categories
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Philosophical Research
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
User:Reversedragon/sci1
User page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
User contributions
Logs
View user groups
Special pages
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
<div class="bop" style="border-top: 1px solid var(--border-color-base,#a2a9b1); padding-top: 0.9em;"> <h3 style="margin: 0 0 0.9em 0; padding-top: 0;" data-datetime="">25-1</h3> <div style="white-space: pre-wrap; font-family: inherit; background: inherit; border: none;"> [112 bookmark] [399 bookmark] antiparticle 20-21 opposite directions across some field? balance of nature 30 a mature forest contains aging trees and grows slowly black holes 45-47 basically unconnected to universe 45 teeny black holes 10^-33 cm 47 black-body radiation 48-49 can a perfectly absorbing body store infinite energy?? 48 nope - atoms can't absorb or emit all wavelengths, causing some to leak out 49 quantum leap 51 discrete change in orbitals boltzmann constant 54 statistical mechanics; (1/2)mv^2 = kT point this to the search for 137 oh yeah boltzmann gave up and died by suicide 54 accurate models of the world are not guaranteed to be accepted by anyone just because they are correct. hearing this, existential materialists will nod their heads; moral philosophers and Gramscians should be very worried brewster's law 58 light takes the shape of electro-magnetic fields; polarization is the way the electric field points brownian motion 59 showed there really are countable atoms degeneracy pressure of electrons 69 stops white dwarfs from collapsing if they are below Chandrasekhar limit Cherenkov radiation 77 when you outrun light inside glass you create a light boom chronology protection conjecture 78 anthropic principle for time "if time is a dimension--" it might not be though, quantum fields can be interpreted as dimensions, but on that dimension activity moves stochastically Giratina is one of the only accurate portrayals in fiction of "extra dimensions", because it is a fanciful portrayal of quantum fields having two directions that separate the domain of matter from antimatter, and the Distortion World is intended to be separated from the regular world by its characteristics. if it were perfectly accurate it would destroy trainers the moment they walk in, of course, but a creature made of antimatter is not actually that weird if it was somehow surrounded by antimatter hadrons, skies, and platforms. competitive exclusion principle 85 differential resource utilization 121 natural resources are slotted; extirpation appears to depend on the question of successfully finding a slot competitive exclusion of species, due to amount or slotting, doesn't occur because they form niches this is not necessarily an ironclad physical law but the pattern keeps recurring complementarity principle 86-87 beam of electrons behaves as a wave, cannon of electrons behaves as a particle /sometimes/ complex adaptive systems 88 complex system: system with many interacting agents, can be as basic as a pile of sand complex adaptive system: system in which agents can take in stimulus and respond "emergent properties ... don't appear gradually" - I'm not sure that's true for all complex systems, because of things like neutron decay where the first small change has to occur before the big one ever does. I think this is clearer if you study non-adaptive systems before the properly adaptive ones compound motion 89-91 motion vectors can be broken down 89 this is a cool one, because it shows how everyday movement may resemble quantum field dimensions. really things are connected, but sometimes it works out just fine to mathematically separate each aspect because every direction is a process Compton effect 92 photon-electron interactions take energy and angle from incoming photons at once an x-ray beam going through a crystal is a Feynman diagram correspondence principle 98 quantum equations do properly predict larger scales, just a bit inefficiently versus coarse-grained classical equations this principle is so damning for any argument we can't predict complex adaptive systems. atoms are complex systems. quarks are complex systems. nobody finds it impossible to predict hadrons. open / closed universe 99-101 dark energy: material cause of expanding universe pushing against gravity 100 two thirds of the energy in the universe is dark energy dark energy was thought to be described by the cosmological constant, but that is not clear any more some hypothesize that dark energy can be properly termed a force - the quintessence hypothesis curie point 106 temperature affects the magnetic fields of atoms determinism 116 planets move Mercury; emergence is difficult deterministic chaos 118 diffraction 122 dispersion 123 zero-point energy 403 a minimum energy makes the uncertainty principle not a problem. why? triune brain 407 haeckel style concept that brain shape recapitulates phylogeny. interesting word usage - in another sense _don't_ we have at least three brains? turing test; Chinese room 409 uniformitarianism; The present is key to the past 411 sure is confusing that geologists say this and astrophysicists say the laws of the universe had to develop, huh vital force 415 in the 1800s, people thought there was a unique Element to living substances, as interesting as Water, Fire, Light, or Darkness. well, sort of..... we call it carbon Zeno's paradox 419 there is a transition from infinitesimal numbers to numbers we can measure where infinitesimals are discarded. calculus limits were required to comprehend numbers infinitely, but physical things aren't really infinite, important to remember </div></div> <div class="bop-foot" style="border-top: 1px solid var(--border-color-base,#a2a9b1); padding-top: 1.2em; margin-top: 1em;"> <!-- {{Template:BopFwd|Philosophical_Research:Molecular_Democracy/4.4r/9320_ES-strands|v4.4 scraps/ Existentialist-Structuralist strands/ fractal Liberalism}} -->{{Template:BopFooter|2025-??|sci1|25sci1|RD commentary/ science A to Z}} </div><!-- -->[[Category:RD commentary]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Philosophical Research may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar
free resource
.
Copyright is complete nonsense
, but people do have to buy items to be able to charge anyone taxes.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Templates used on this page:
Template:BopFooter
(
edit
)
Template:BopFooter/time
(
edit
)