Category:Non-binary truth values ontology - Revision history

Reversedragon: boolean false

2025-08-05T05:20:02Z

boolean false

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:20, 5 August 2025
Line 23:		Line 23:

	<ol class="hue clean compound">		<ol class="hue clean compound">
			{{HueNumber\|Q540}} <!-- en: boolean false -->
	{{HueNumber\|Q280}} <!-- en: statement with no possible backing claims -->		{{HueNumber\|Q280}} <!-- en: statement with no possible backing claims -->
	{{HueNumber\|Q288}} <!-- en: misinformation or disinformation -->		{{HueNumber\|Q288}} <!-- en: misinformation or disinformation -->

Reversedragon: boolean true

2025-08-05T05:11:29Z

boolean true

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:11, 5 August 2025
Line 8:		Line 8:
	</ol>		</ol>

	== ~~Indeterminate~~ statements ==		== Truthy statements ==

	=~~= Truthy statements ==~~		<ol class="hue clean compound">
			{{HueNumber\|Q541}} <!-- en: boolean true -->
			</ol>

	{{~~HueCSS~~}}<ol class="hue clean"><!-- from [[User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand\|prototype]] -->		{{HueDrop}}<ol class="hue clean"><!-- from [[User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand\|prototype]] -->
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="618" data-dimension="S0">statement which is technically true in some contexts		</li><li class="field_geo" value="618" data-dimension="S0">statement which is technically true in some contexts
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="618" data-dimension="S0">statement which is technically true in most contexts		</li><li class="field_geo" value="618" data-dimension="S0">statement which is technically true in most contexts
Line 21:		Line 23:

	<ol class="hue clean compound">		<ol class="hue clean compound">
	{{HueNumber\|Q280}}		{{HueNumber\|Q280}} <!-- en: statement with no possible backing claims -->
	{{HueNumber\|Q288}}		{{HueNumber\|Q288}} <!-- en: misinformation or disinformation -->
	</ol>		</ol>

Line 29:		Line 31:
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="618" data-dimension="S0">statement which is logical but not sound -> a lot of the [[Ontology:Q1501\|brown]] propositions and some of the [[:Category:Existentialist-Structuralist tradition ontology\|blue]] ones are literally just this.		</li><li class="field_geo" value="618" data-dimension="S0">statement which is logical but not sound -> a lot of the [[Ontology:Q1501\|brown]] propositions and some of the [[:Category:Existentialist-Structuralist tradition ontology\|blue]] ones are literally just this.
	</ol>		</ol>

			== Indeterminate statements ==

	== General principles ==		== General principles ==

Reversedragon: binary truth values

2025-08-05T04:46:08Z

binary truth values

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:46, 5 August 2025
Line 5:		Line 5:
	<ol class="hue clean compound">		<ol class="hue clean compound">
	{{HueNumber\|Q530/UU}} <!-- en: non-binary truth value -->		{{HueNumber\|Q530/UU}} <!-- en: non-binary truth value -->
			{{HueNumber\|Q539}} <!-- en: binary truth value -->
	</ol>		</ol>

Line 35:		Line 36:
	</ol>		</ol>

	[[Category:Epistemology ontology]] [[Category:~~Propositional~~ logic ontology]]
			[[Category:Epistemology ontology]] [[Category:Proposition-based logic ontology]]

Reversedragon: non-binary truth value

2025-08-05T03:02:42Z

non-binary truth value

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:02, 5 August 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This is a Category for various possible responses to the question "is this statement true?" which define themselves according to the range of possible ways statements actually apply to the real world or some specific defined reality that can be probed and investigated. In concept, the range of possibilities that could go in here may be infinite, or at least very large; the number of possible correspondences between statements and reality is proportional to the relationship between any particular imagined model and real things.		This is a Category for various possible responses to the question "is this statement true?" which define themselves according to the range of possible ways statements actually apply to the real world or some specific defined reality that can be probed and investigated. In concept, the range of possibilities that could go in here may be infinite, or at least very large; the number of possible correspondences between statements and reality is proportional to the relationship between any particular imagined model and real things.

	== ~~Kinds~~ of truth values ==		== Groupings of truth values ==

			<ol class="hue clean compound">
			{{HueNumber\|Q530/UU}} <!-- en: non-binary truth value -->
			</ol>

	== Indeterminate statements ==		== Indeterminate statements ==

Reversedragon: category - non-binary logic is the default kind of propositional logic advanced on this wiki, so it can be put in "Propositional logic"

2025-08-05T01:41:07Z

category - non-binary logic is the default kind of propositional logic advanced on this wiki, so it can be put in "Propositional logic"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:41, 5 August 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This is a Category for various possible responses to the question "is this statement true?" which define themselves according to the range of possible ways statements actually apply to the real world or some specific defined reality that can be probed and investigated. In concept, the range of possibilities that could go in here may be infinite, or at least very large; the number of possible correspondences between statements and reality is proportional to the relationship between any particular imagined model and real things.		This is a Category for various possible responses to the question "is this statement true?" which define themselves according to the range of possible ways statements actually apply to the real world or some specific defined reality that can be probed and investigated. In concept, the range of possibilities that could go in here may be infinite, or at least very large; the number of possible correspondences between statements and reality is proportional to the relationship between any particular imagined model and real things.

			== Kinds of truth values ==

	== Indeterminate statements ==		== Indeterminate statements ==
Line 29:		Line 31:
	</ol>		</ol>

	[[Category:Epistemology ontology]] [[Category:~~Non-binary~~ logic ontology]]		[[Category:Epistemology ontology]] [[Category:Propositional logic ontology]]

Reversedragon: No proposition has a binary True or False answer

2025-07-21T04:48:33Z

No proposition has a binary True or False answer

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:48, 21 July 2025
Line 25:		Line 25:
	== General principles ==		== General principles ==

	<ol class="hue clean">~~<!-- from [[User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand~~\|~~prototype]] -->~~		<ol class="hue clean compound">
	</li><li class="field_mdem" value="2949" data-dimension="S2">[S2] No proposition has a binary True or False value / Propositions generally should not have a binary True or False value / The way to fix logic is to replace binary outcomes with sheer tests of consistency -> you don't fully break out of the Gödel trap this way because practically nothing ever could do that anyway. that part is not what matters. ideally the point of logic isn't to derive facts about reality in a vacuum but instead to perform a basic sanity test of whether statements you already have could possibly be correct or are almost definitely wrong. arguably, ~~that is the thing that logic actually excels at even as it is inappropriate for many other things.~~		{{HueNumber\|Q29,49}}
	</ol>		</ol>

	[[Category:Epistemology ontology]] [[Category:Non-binary logic ontology]]		[[Category:Epistemology ontology]] [[Category:Non-binary logic ontology]]

Reversedragon: No proposition has a binary true or false value

2025-07-20T07:43:35Z

No proposition has a binary true or false value

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:43, 20 July 2025
Line 4:		Line 4:

	== Truthy statements ==		== Truthy statements ==

			{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean"><!-- from [[User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand\|prototype]] -->
			</li><li class="field_geo" value="618" data-dimension="S0">statement which is technically true in some contexts
			</li><li class="field_geo" value="618" data-dimension="S0">statement which is technically true in most contexts
			</li><li class="field_geo" value="618" data-dimension="S0">backhandedly-true statement / backhandedly correct statement -> a statement which says one particular thing on the surface, and has a particular reasoning for why that's true, but where the surface statement turns out to be true for another different reason that likely <em>really</em> goes against the intention behind the original reasoning for the statement. named in reference to "backhanded compliments", which are statements that sound like compliments but end up complimenting something unflattering.
			</ol>

	== Falsy statements ==		== Falsy statements ==
Line 12:		Line 18:
	</ol>		</ol>

	~~== Proposed Items ==~~		<ol class="hue clean"><!-- from [[User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand\|prototype]] -->

	~~{{HueCSS}}~~<ol class="hue clean"><!-- from [[User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand\|prototype]] -->

	</li><li class="field_geo" value="618" data-dimension="S0">backhandedly-true statement / backhandedly correct statement -> a statement which says one particular thing on the surface, and has a particular reasoning for why that's true, but where the surface statement turns out to be true for another different reason that likely <em>really</em> goes against the intention behind the original reasoning for the statement. named in reference to "backhanded compliments", which are statements that sound like compliments but end up complimenting something unflattering.

	</li><li class="field_geo" value="618" data-dimension="S0">statement with logical contradictions		</li><li class="field_geo" value="618" data-dimension="S0">statement with logical contradictions
	</li><li class="field_geo" value="618" data-dimension="S0">statement which is logical but not sound -> a lot of the [[Ontology:Q1501\|brown]] propositions and some of the [[:Category:Existentialist-Structuralist tradition ontology\|blue]] ones are literally just this.		</li><li class="field_geo" value="618" data-dimension="S0">statement which is logical but not sound -> a lot of the [[Ontology:Q1501\|brown]] propositions and some of the [[:Category:Existentialist-Structuralist tradition ontology\|blue]] ones are literally just this.
	</li>~~<li class="field_geo" value="618" data-dimension~~=~~"S0">statement which is technically true in some contexts~~		</ol>
	~~</li><li class~~=~~"field_geo" value~~=~~"618" data-dimension~~=~~"S0">statement which is technically true in most contexts~~
			== General principles ==

			<ol class="hue clean"><!-- from [[User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand\|prototype]] -->
			</li><li class="field_mdem" value="2949" data-dimension="S2">[S2] No proposition has a binary True or False value / Propositions generally should not have a binary True or False value / The way to fix logic is to replace binary outcomes with sheer tests of consistency -> you don't fully break out of the Gödel trap this way because practically nothing ever could do that anyway. that part is not what matters. ideally the point of logic isn't to derive facts about reality in a vacuum but instead to perform a basic sanity test of whether statements you already have could possibly be correct or are almost definitely wrong. arguably, that is the thing that logic actually excels at even as it is inappropriate for many other things.
	</ol>		</ol>

	[[Category:Epistemology ontology]] [[Category:Non-binary logic ontology]]		[[Category:Epistemology ontology]] [[Category:Non-binary logic ontology]]

Reversedragon: move proposed statement types here from prototype

2025-07-20T05:23:09Z

move proposed statement types here from prototype

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:23, 20 July 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This is a Category for various possible responses to the question "is this statement true?" which define themselves according to the range of possible ways statements actually apply to the real world or some specific defined reality that can be probed and investigated. In concept, the range of possibilities that could go in here may be infinite, or at least very large; the number of possible correspondences between statements and reality is proportional to the relationship between any particular imagined model and real things.		This is a Category for various possible responses to the question "is this statement true?" which define themselves according to the range of possible ways statements actually apply to the real world or some specific defined reality that can be probed and investigated. In concept, the range of possibilities that could go in here may be infinite, or at least very large; the number of possible correspondences between statements and reality is proportional to the relationship between any particular imagined model and real things.

	[[Category:~~Philosophy or field ontologies~~]]		== Indeterminate statements ==

			== Truthy statements ==

			== Falsy statements ==

			<ol class="hue clean compound">
			{{HueNumber\|Q280}}
			{{HueNumber\|Q288}}
			</ol>

			== Proposed Items ==

			{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean"><!-- from [[User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand\|prototype]] -->

			</li><li class="field_geo" value="618" data-dimension="S0">backhandedly-true statement / backhandedly correct statement -> a statement which says one particular thing on the surface, and has a particular reasoning for why that's true, but where the surface statement turns out to be true for another different reason that likely <em>really</em> goes against the intention behind the original reasoning for the statement. named in reference to "backhanded compliments", which are statements that sound like compliments but end up complimenting something unflattering.

			</li><li class="field_geo" value="618" data-dimension="S0">statement with logical contradictions
			</li><li class="field_geo" value="618" data-dimension="S0">statement which is logical but not sound -> a lot of the [[Ontology:Q1501\|brown]] propositions and some of the [[:Category:Existentialist-Structuralist tradition ontology\|blue]] ones are literally just this.
			</li><li class="field_geo" value="618" data-dimension="S0">statement which is technically true in some contexts
			</li><li class="field_geo" value="618" data-dimension="S0">statement which is technically true in most contexts

			</ol>

			[[Category:Epistemology ontology]] [[Category:Non-binary logic ontology]]

Reversedragon: description

2025-07-20T02:49:49Z

description

New page

This is a Category for various possible responses to the question "is this statement true?" which define themselves according to the range of possible ways statements actually apply to the real world or some specific defined reality that can be probed and investigated. In concept, the range of possibilities that could go in here may be infinite, or at least very large; the number of possible correspondences between statements and reality is proportional to the relationship between any particular imagined model and real things.

[[Category:Philosophy or field ontologies]]