Category:S2 Double-Signifying Statements - Revision history

Reversedragon: icon demo

2025-04-23T04:12:15Z

icon demo

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:12, 23 April 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Items that arrange distinguishable concepts or entities [[Philosophical_Research:Data_model#S2_Statements\|into some sort of proposition]] that can be evaluated for its level of truth or accuracy. Some S2 Statements are [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposition non-fictional statements about the real world]; other S2 Statements may include things like fan theories for fictional media or mathematical conjectures.		Items that arrange distinguishable concepts or entities [[Philosophical_Research:Data_model#S2_Statements\|into some sort of proposition]] that can be evaluated for its level of truth or accuracy. Some S2 Statements are [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposition non-fictional statements about the real world]; other S2 Statements may include things like fan theories for fictional media or mathematical conjectures.

	Any given S2 Statement should not necessarily be assumed to be neatly true or neatly false; in theory, an S2 Statement could contain wrongly-sectioned ontological models that require complicated answers to properly correct them. This is why S2 Statements and other such level 2 statements should generally follow the principle of <i>modeling claimed statements instead of facts</i>. However, if there is solid evidence to categorize an S2 Statement as <i>false</i> or <i>never meaningfully true in a reliable way</i>, the S2 Statement may be reclassified into an [[~~redlink~~\|F2 Statement]].		Any given S2 Statement should not necessarily be assumed to be neatly true or neatly false; in theory, an S2 Statement could contain wrongly-sectioned ontological models that require complicated answers to properly correct them. This is why S2 Statements and other such level 2 statements should generally follow the principle of <i>modeling claimed statements instead of facts</i>. However, if there is solid evidence to categorize an S2 Statement as <i>false</i> or <i>never meaningfully true in a reliable way</i>, the S2 Statement may be reclassified into an [[:Category:F2 Factually-Devoid Claims\|F2 Statement]].

	== Ontology entry ==		== Ontology entry ==
Line 9:		Line 9:
	{{HueNumber\|Q3002}} <!-- en: S2 Statement -->		{{HueNumber\|Q3002}} <!-- en: S2 Statement -->
	</ol>		</ol>

			== Icon form ==

			<dl class="wikitable hue">
			{{HueRoster\|P=label (en)\| <dfn class{{=}}"field_exstruct manual" data-dimension{{=}}"S2" data-qid{{=}}"617">{{Template:IS2}}[[Template:IS2\|S2 Statements are propositions]]</dfn> }}
			</dl>

	[[Category:Hue-format fake Items]] [[Category:Item dimensions ontology]]		[[Category:Hue-format fake Items]] [[Category:Item dimensions ontology]]

Reversedragon: link: Data model

2025-04-21T01:07:19Z

link: Data model

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:07, 21 April 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Items that arrange distinguishable concepts or entities into some sort of ~~[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposition~~ proposition] that can be evaluated for its level of truth or accuracy. Some S2 Statements are non-fictional statements about the real world; other S2 Statements may include things like fan theories for fictional media or mathematical conjectures.		Items that arrange distinguishable concepts or entities [[Philosophical_Research:Data_model#S2_Statements\|into some sort of proposition]] that can be evaluated for its level of truth or accuracy. Some S2 Statements are [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposition non-fictional statements about the real world]; other S2 Statements may include things like fan theories for fictional media or mathematical conjectures.

	Any given S2 Statement should not necessarily be assumed to be neatly true or neatly false; in theory, an S2 Statement could contain wrongly-sectioned ontological models that require complicated answers to properly correct them. This is why S2 Statements and other such level 2 statements should generally follow the principle of <i>modeling claimed statements instead of facts</i>. However, if there is solid evidence to categorize an S2 Statement as <i>false</i> or <i>never meaningfully true in a reliable way</i>, the S2 Statement may be reclassified into an [[redlink\|F2 Statement]].		Any given S2 Statement should not necessarily be assumed to be neatly true or neatly false; in theory, an S2 Statement could contain wrongly-sectioned ontological models that require complicated answers to properly correct them. This is why S2 Statements and other such level 2 statements should generally follow the principle of <i>modeling claimed statements instead of facts</i>. However, if there is solid evidence to categorize an S2 Statement as <i>false</i> or <i>never meaningfully true in a reliable way</i>, the S2 Statement may be reclassified into an [[redlink\|F2 Statement]].

Reversedragon: css

2025-04-21T01:03:48Z

css

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:03, 21 April 2025
Line 5:		Line 5:
	== Ontology entry ==		== Ontology entry ==

			{{HueCSS}}
	<ol class="hue clean compound">		<ol class="hue clean compound">
	{{HueNumber\|Q3002}} <!-- en: S2 Statement -->		{{HueNumber\|Q3002}} <!-- en: S2 Statement -->

Reversedragon: category

2025-03-24T21:38:47Z

Reversedragon: number list

2025-03-24T11:32:07Z

number list

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:32, 24 March 2025
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Any given S2 Statement should not necessarily be assumed to be neatly true or neatly false; in theory, an S2 Statement could contain wrongly-sectioned ontological models that require complicated answers to properly correct them. This is why S2 Statements and other such level 2 statements should generally follow the principle of <i>modeling claimed statements instead of facts</i>. However, if there is solid evidence to categorize an S2 Statement as <i>false</i> or <i>never meaningfully true in a reliable way</i>, the S2 Statement may be reclassified into an [[redlink\|F2 Statement]].		Any given S2 Statement should not necessarily be assumed to be neatly true or neatly false; in theory, an S2 Statement could contain wrongly-sectioned ontological models that require complicated answers to properly correct them. This is why S2 Statements and other such level 2 statements should generally follow the principle of <i>modeling claimed statements instead of facts</i>. However, if there is solid evidence to categorize an S2 Statement as <i>false</i> or <i>never meaningfully true in a reliable way</i>, the S2 Statement may be reclassified into an [[redlink\|F2 Statement]].

			== Ontology entry ==

			<ol class="hue clean compound">
			{{HueNumber\|Q3002}} <!-- en: S2 Statement -->
			</ol>

	[[Category:Hue-format fake Items]]		[[Category:Hue-format fake Items]]

Reversedragon: category

2025-03-23T04:55:07Z

Reversedragon: category

2025-03-23T04:53:23Z

Reversedragon: description

2025-03-23T04:52:14Z

description

New page

Items that arrange distinguishable concepts or entities into some sort of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposition proposition] that can be evaluated for its level of truth or accuracy. Some S2 Statements are non-fictional statements about the real world; other S2 Statements may include things like fan theories for fictional media or mathematical conjectures.

Any given S2 Statement should not necessarily be assumed to be neatly true or neatly false; in theory, an S2 Statement could contain wrongly-sectioned ontological models that require complicated answers to properly correct them. This is why S2 Statements and other such level 2 statements should generally follow the principle of modeling claimed statements instead of facts. However, if there is solid evidence to categorize an S2 Statement as false or never meaningfully true in a reliable way, the S2 Statement may be reclassified into an [[redlink|F2 Statement]].

[[Category:Top]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:55, 23 March 2025
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Any given S2 Statement should not necessarily be assumed to be neatly true or neatly false; in theory, an S2 Statement could contain wrongly-sectioned ontological models that require complicated answers to properly correct them. This is why S2 Statements and other such level 2 statements should generally follow the principle of <i>modeling claimed statements instead of facts</i>. However, if there is solid evidence to categorize an S2 Statement as <i>false</i> or <i>never meaningfully true in a reliable way</i>, the S2 Statement may be reclassified into an [[redlink\|F2 Statement]].		Any given S2 Statement should not necessarily be assumed to be neatly true or neatly false; in theory, an S2 Statement could contain wrongly-sectioned ontological models that require complicated answers to properly correct them. This is why S2 Statements and other such level 2 statements should generally follow the principle of <i>modeling claimed statements instead of facts</i>. However, if there is solid evidence to categorize an S2 Statement as <i>false</i> or <i>never meaningfully true in a reliable way</i>, the S2 Statement may be reclassified into an [[redlink\|F2 Statement]].

	[[Category:~~Ontology portals~~]]		[[Category:Hue-format fake Items]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:53, 23 March 2025
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Any given S2 Statement should not necessarily be assumed to be neatly true or neatly false; in theory, an S2 Statement could contain wrongly-sectioned ontological models that require complicated answers to properly correct them. This is why S2 Statements and other such level 2 statements should generally follow the principle of <i>modeling claimed statements instead of facts</i>. However, if there is solid evidence to categorize an S2 Statement as <i>false</i> or <i>never meaningfully true in a reliable way</i>, the S2 Statement may be reclassified into an [[redlink\|F2 Statement]].		Any given S2 Statement should not necessarily be assumed to be neatly true or neatly false; in theory, an S2 Statement could contain wrongly-sectioned ontological models that require complicated answers to properly correct them. This is why S2 Statements and other such level 2 statements should generally follow the principle of <i>modeling claimed statements instead of facts</i>. However, if there is solid evidence to categorize an S2 Statement as <i>false</i> or <i>never meaningfully true in a reliable way</i>, the S2 Statement may be reclassified into an [[redlink\|F2 Statement]].

	[[Category:~~Top~~]]		[[Category:Ontology portals]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:38, 24 March 2025
Line 9:		Line 9:
	</ol>		</ol>

	[[Category:Hue-format fake Items]]		[[Category:Hue-format fake Items]] [[Category:Item dimensions ontology]]