Ontology:P203 - Revision history

Reversedragon: Dirac equation; Bordigism

2025-06-19T08:36:56Z

Dirac equation; Bordigism

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:36, 19 June 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{HueCSS}}~~<!--~~		{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean compound">
	~~-->~~<ol class="hue clean compound">
	<li><onlyinclude><dfn class="field_geo manual" data-dimension="P" data-qid="203" data-numbersign="200" data-field="Property" data-series="" data-work="" data-chapter="" data-tale="" data-object="" data-note="communication question" data-lexeme="" data-structure="item">{{IP0}}{{#if: {{{1\|}}} \| [[Ontology:{{{1}}}\|{{{1}}}]] \| [[Ontology:P203\|"Dirac test"]] }}<ins class="data-structure"> [rating]</ins></dfn></onlyinclude> __NOTOC__		<li><onlyinclude><dfn class="field_geo manual" data-dimension="P" data-qid="203" data-numbersign="200" data-field="Property" data-series="" data-work="" data-chapter="" data-tale="" data-object="" data-note="communication question" data-lexeme="" data-structure="item">{{IP0}}{{#if: {{{1\|}}} \| [[Ontology:{{{1}}}\|{{{1}}}]] \| [[Ontology:P203\|"Dirac test"]] }}<ins class="data-structure"> [rating]</ins></dfn></onlyinclude> __NOTOC__
	</li></ol><!-- change summary template: copy or update fake Item from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN\|P203]] -->		</li></ol><!-- change summary template: copy or update fake Item from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN\|P203]] -->
Line 29:		Line 28:
	* A work fails the test if it is entirely composed of "ontological spaghetti" in which every word in an entire book requires learning about the full depths of the entire model being presented in order to understand any word in the entire book. Notorious examples include works by Jacques Lacan and Slavoj Žižek.		* A work fails the test if it is entirely composed of "ontological spaghetti" in which every word in an entire book requires learning about the full depths of the entire model being presented in order to understand any word in the entire book. Notorious examples include works by Jacques Lacan and Slavoj Žižek.
	* A work does not fail the test if it consists of a core text which is difficult to parse and a commentary which makes it more understandable. In this case, the test should be applied mainly to the commentary.		* A work does not fail the test if it consists of a core text which is difficult to parse and a commentary which makes it more understandable. In this case, the test should be applied mainly to the commentary.
	* This test is named after the Dirac equation for computing interactions of fermions using Lorentz transforms and matrices. If you do not understand what this equation actually converts into what after skimming an entire hour-long Wikipedia article about it, then you understand why the Dirac test is necessary.		** This is apparently a significant problem for Bordigist texts. The original works may fail the test, but commentaries directly including them may pass.
			* This test is named after the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_equation Dirac equation] for computing interactions of fermions using Lorentz transforms and matrices. If you do not understand what this equation actually converts into what after skimming an entire hour-long Wikipedia article about it, then you understand why the Dirac test is necessary.


	[[Category:Properties accepting a communication rating level]] [[Category:Communication rating levels ontology]]		[[Category:Properties accepting a communication rating level]] [[Category:Communication rating levels ontology]]

Reversedragon: qualification

2025-06-03T11:23:57Z

qualification

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:23, 3 June 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{HueCSS}}<!--		{{HueCSS}}<!--
	--><ol class="hue clean compound">		--><ol class="hue clean compound">
	<li><onlyinclude><dfn class="field_geo manual" data-dimension="P" data-qid="203" data-numbersign="200" data-field="Property" data-series="" data-work="" data-chapter="" data-tale="" data-object="" data-note="communication question" data-lexeme="" data-structure="item">{{IP0}}{{#if: {{{1\|}}} \| [[Ontology:{{{1}}}\|{{{1}}}]] \| [[Ontology:P203\|"Dirac test"]] }}<ins class="data-structure"> [~~Item~~]</ins></dfn></onlyinclude> __NOTOC__		<li><onlyinclude><dfn class="field_geo manual" data-dimension="P" data-qid="203" data-numbersign="200" data-field="Property" data-series="" data-work="" data-chapter="" data-tale="" data-object="" data-note="communication question" data-lexeme="" data-structure="item">{{IP0}}{{#if: {{{1\|}}} \| [[Ontology:{{{1}}}\|{{{1}}}]] \| [[Ontology:P203\|"Dirac test"]] }}<ins class="data-structure"> [rating]</ins></dfn></onlyinclude> __NOTOC__
	</li></ol><!-- change summary template: copy or update fake Item from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN\|P203]] -->		</li></ol><!-- change summary template: copy or update fake Item from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN\|P203]] -->

Reversedragon: change data-structure to html tag

2025-05-31T00:22:22Z

change data-structure to html tag

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:22, 31 May 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{HueCSS}}<!--		{{HueCSS}}<!--
	--><ol class="hue clean compound">		--><ol class="hue clean compound">
	<li><onlyinclude><dfn class="field_geo manual" data-dimension="P" data-qid="203" data-numbersign="200" data-field="Property" data-series="" data-work="" data-chapter="" data-tale="" data-object="" data-note="communication question" data-lexeme="" data-structure="item">{{IP0}}{{#if: {{{1\|}}} \| [[Ontology:{{{1}}}\|{{{1}}}]] \| [[Ontology:P203\|"Dirac test"]] }}</dfn></onlyinclude> __NOTOC__		<li><onlyinclude><dfn class="field_geo manual" data-dimension="P" data-qid="203" data-numbersign="200" data-field="Property" data-series="" data-work="" data-chapter="" data-tale="" data-object="" data-note="communication question" data-lexeme="" data-structure="item">{{IP0}}{{#if: {{{1\|}}} \| [[Ontology:{{{1}}}\|{{{1}}}]] \| [[Ontology:P203\|"Dirac test"]] }}<ins class="data-structure"> [Item]</ins></dfn></onlyinclude> __NOTOC__
	</li></ol><!-- change summary template: copy or update fake Item from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN\|P203]] -->		</li></ol><!-- change summary template: copy or update fake Item from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN\|P203]] -->

	<dl class="wikitable hue">		<dl class="wikitable hue">{{HueRoster\|P={{Ontology:P203}}\| field value \|OP1=test passed\| {{Ontology:P203/G}} \|OP2=test failed\| {{Ontology:P203/NG}} }}</dl>
	{{HueRoster\|P={{Ontology:P203}}\| field value \|OP1=test passed\| {{Ontology:P203/G}} \|OP2=test failed\| {{Ontology:P203/NG}} }}
	</dl>

	== Characteristics in draft ==		== Characteristics in draft ==

Reversedragon: Usage notes

2025-05-30T12:15:26Z

Usage notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:15, 30 May 2025
Line 21:		Line 21:
	</dl>		</dl>

	== ~~Prototype~~ notes ==		== Usage notes ==

	* ~~A question~~ for ~~judging videos literally~~ aimed at physics ~~professors~~. ~~It's possible for a scientific hypothesis~~ to be aimed at ~~a very high level~~ and ~~still~~ be unintelligible to highly educated people ~~who are new~~ to the field.		* This test is intended for works aimed at relatively educated audiences, such as interviews about cutting-edge physics hypotheses or theoretical guidance for Marxist organizers. For these kinds of works which cannot be assumed to be aimed at everyday people, many other tests on the rubric will not be appropriate and may be skipped.
	** ~~Also applies~~ to "~~ontological~~ spaghetti" ~~where someone like Žižek presents a model that~~ is ~~completely incomprehensible~~ to ~~any human being at first sight~~.		* A work fails the Dirac test if it is unintelligible at first sight to highly educated people even though it claims to be an introduction to the topic it is about.
	* ~~Would this description~~ or ~~argument look unnecessarily opaque to~~ a ~~college-~~educated person~~? (~~"~~Bachelor test~~")		* A work fails the test if a college-educated person not educated in its particular field would be unable to locate any way of learning a quick overview of the building blocks of the theory or proposition being presented in a reasonable amount of time and for a reasonable amount of money.
			** A work failing the test for this reason will not necessarily be "fatal" to it receiving a good rating if it happens to be the case that it really is instructive behind all the "spaghetti".
	~~== Usage notes ==~~		* If the work is strictly intended to follow works which pass the test and these works are not difficult for ordinary people to find, then it does not fail.
			** The question of whether ordinary people can <em>find</em> or <em>obtain</em> the introductory works does not require that ordinary people can understand them. If an ordinary person can pick up a book they find unintelligible at a used book store and drop it on the desk of an educated person and it is understandable as an introduction to a topic, that book passes the test, and any book strictly following it is able to pass the test.
			* A work fails the test if it is entirely composed of "ontological spaghetti" in which every word in an entire book requires learning about the full depths of the entire model being presented in order to understand any word in the entire book. Notorious examples include works by Jacques Lacan and Slavoj Žižek.
			* A work does not fail the test if it consists of a core text which is difficult to parse and a commentary which makes it more understandable. In this case, the test should be applied mainly to the commentary.
			* This test is named after the Dirac equation for computing interactions of fermions using Lorentz transforms and matrices. If you do not understand what this equation actually converts into what after skimming an entire hour-long Wikipedia article about it, then you understand why the Dirac test is necessary.


	[[Category:Properties accepting a communication rating level]] [[Category:Communication rating levels ontology]]		[[Category:Properties accepting a communication rating level]] [[Category:Communication rating levels ontology]]

Reversedragon: clean up

2025-05-21T12:41:11Z

clean up

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:41, 21 May 2025
Line 23:		Line 23:
	== Prototype notes ==		== Prototype notes ==

	* Is this description or argument unnecessarily opaque for its intended educational level? ("Dirac test")		* A question for judging videos literally aimed at physics professors. It's possible for a scientific hypothesis to be aimed at a very high level and still be unintelligible to highly educated people who are new to the field.
	** A question for judging videos literally aimed at physics professors. It's possible for a scientific hypothesis to be aimed at a very high level and still be unintelligible to highly educated people who are new to the field.
	** Also applies to "ontological spaghetti" where someone like Žižek presents a model that is completely incomprehensible to any human being at first sight.		** Also applies to "ontological spaghetti" where someone like Žižek presents a model that is completely incomprehensible to any human being at first sight.
	* Would this description or argument look unnecessarily opaque to a college-educated person? ("Bachelor test")		* Would this description or argument look unnecessarily opaque to a college-educated person? ("Bachelor test")

			== Usage notes ==


	[[Category:Properties accepting a communication rating level]] [[Category:Communication rating levels ontology]]		[[Category:Properties accepting a communication rating level]] [[Category:Communication rating levels ontology]]

Reversedragon: pass / fail

2025-05-19T06:54:27Z

pass / fail

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:54, 19 May 2025
Line 5:		Line 5:

	<dl class="wikitable hue">		<dl class="wikitable hue">
	{{HueRoster\|P={{Ontology:P203}}\| field value \|OP1=test passed\| {{Ontology:~~P213~~/G}} \|OP2=test failed\| {{Ontology:~~P213~~/NG}} }}		{{HueRoster\|P={{Ontology:P203}}\| field value \|OP1=test passed\| {{Ontology:P203/G}} \|OP2=test failed\| {{Ontology:P203/NG}} }}
	</dl>		</dl>

Reversedragon: copy or update fake Item from P213

2025-05-19T03:26:35Z

copy or update fake Item from P213

New page

{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean compound">
<li><onlyinclude><dfn class="field_geo manual" data-dimension="P" data-qid="203" data-numbersign="200" data-field="Property" data-series="" data-work="" data-chapter="" data-tale="" data-object="" data-note="communication question" data-lexeme="" data-structure="item">{{IP0}}{{#if: {{{1|}}} | [[Ontology:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] | [[Ontology:P203|"Dirac test"]] }}</dfn></onlyinclude> __NOTOC__
</li></ol>

<dl class="wikitable hue">
{{HueRoster|P={{Ontology:P203}}| field value |OP1=test passed| {{Ontology:P213/G}} |OP2=test failed| {{Ontology:P213/NG}} }}
</dl>

== Characteristics in draft ==

=== Properties ===

<dl class="wikitable hue">
{{HueClaim|P=item type| {{Template:P}} }}
{{HueRoster|P=label (en)| {{Ontology:P203}} }}
{{HueRoster|P=alias (en)| Is this description or argument unnecessarily opaque for its intended educational level? | Is this description or argument unnecessarily opaque even to educated people? | "Dirac test" (communication question 03) }}
{{HueRoster|P=QID references| P200 rating / communication rating level }}
{{HueRoster|P=color swatch references| quantum mechanics }}
{{HueClaim|P=Property data type| item |OP=instance of| communication rating level }}
</dl>

== Prototype notes ==

* Is this description or argument unnecessarily opaque for its intended educational level? ("Dirac test")
** A question for judging videos literally aimed at physics professors. It's possible for a scientific hypothesis to be aimed at a very high level and still be unintelligible to highly educated people who are new to the field.
** Also applies to "ontological spaghetti" where someone like Žižek presents a model that is completely incomprehensible to any human being at first sight.
* Would this description or argument look unnecessarily opaque to a college-educated person? ("Bachelor test")

[[Category:Properties accepting a communication rating level]] [[Category:Communication rating levels ontology]]