Reversedragon: combination: essay

2025-06-16T03:21:33Z

combination: essay

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:21, 16 June 2025
Line 15:		Line 15:
	== Wavebuilder combinations ==		== Wavebuilder combinations ==

	<dl class="wikitable hue data_wavebuild">		<dl class="wikitable hue data_wavebuild">
			{{WaveBuild\| essay \| {{Ontology:Q1729}} }} <!-- en: WITH ?? PRODUCES ?? -->
	{{WaveBuild\| sentient toys \| <cite>Poppy Playtime</cite> }} <!-- en: WITH ?? PRODUCES ?? -->		{{WaveBuild\| sentient toys \| <cite>Poppy Playtime</cite> }} <!-- en: WITH ?? PRODUCES ?? -->
	{{WaveBuild\| animal independence movement \| Q?? Animal Farm }} <!-- en: WITH ?? PRODUCES ?? -->		{{WaveBuild\| animal independence movement \| Q?? Animal Farm }} <!-- en: WITH ?? PRODUCES ?? -->
	{{WaveBuild\| {{Ontology:Q3676}} \| Q3684 If nobody ever got vaccines, we could have perfectly rational discussions about them }} <!-- en: WITH Freedom requires rejecting COVID measures PRODUCES ?? -->		{{WaveBuild\| {{Ontology:Q3676}} \| Q3684 If nobody ever got vaccines, we could have perfectly rational discussions about them }} <!-- en: WITH Freedom requires rejecting COVID measures PRODUCES ?? -->
	</dl>		</dl><!--

	=== Wavebuilder characterizations ===		=== Wavebuilder characterizations ===

	<dl class="wikitable hue data_wavebuild">		<dl class="wikitable hue data_wavebuild">
	{{WaveRoute\| {{Ontology:Q1729}} \| ?? \| ~~{{Ontology:Q2487}}~~ }} <!-- en: FROM ~~"A modest proposal"~~ ?? ~~-->~~		{{WaveRoute\| {{Ontology:Q1729}} \| -- \| -- }} <!-- en: FROM ?? ??
	</dl>		</dl> -->

	== Usage notes ==		== Usage notes ==

Reversedragon: copy fake Item from Ontology:Q1729

2025-06-16T02:48:44Z

copy fake Item from Ontology:Q1729

New page

{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean compound"><li>
<onlyinclude><dfn class="field_horror" data-dimension="S" data-qid="2487" data-numbersign="404" data-field="non-fictional motif" data-work="A modest proposal" data-object="" data-note="" data-lexeme=""><ins class="tradition dimension-only">[S] </ins>[[Ontology:Q2487|"modest" proposal]]<ins class="field"></ins>{{WaveScore|sum=1|quilt=1|ply=1}}</dfn></onlyinclude> __NOTOC__
</li></ol>

== Core characteristics ==

<dl class="wikitable hue">
{{HueClaim|P=item type| {{Template:S1}} }}
{{HueRoster|P=label (en)| {{Ontology:Q2487}} }}
{{HueRoster|P={{Ontology:P42}}| Q2489 The concept of "scarcity" is prejudiced | {{Ontology:Q1729}} }} 
{{HueRoster|P={{Ontology:P56}}| {{Ontology:Q416}} | {{Ontology:Q1729}} }} 
{{HueClaim|P=case of| non-fictional motif }}
</dl>

== Wavebuilder combinations ==

<dl class="wikitable hue data_wavebuild">
{{WaveBuild| sentient toys | <cite>Poppy Playtime</cite> }} 
{{WaveBuild| animal independence movement | Q?? Animal Farm }} 
{{WaveBuild| {{Ontology:Q3676}} | Q3684 If nobody ever got vaccines, we could have perfectly rational discussions about them }} 
</dl>

=== Wavebuilder characterizations ===

<dl class="wikitable hue data_wavebuild">
{{WaveRoute| {{Ontology:Q1729}} | ?? | {{Ontology:Q2487}} }} 
</dl>

== Usage notes ==

=== Combinations ===

Due to [[Philosophical Research:Schizophrenic point of view|the structure of this wiki]], in which the internal reasoning or mechanics of various ideologies are represented in parallel before then covering how different ideologies support or debunk each other, this motif can easily end up serving as a bridge to any number of "offensive" results. Combinations in general are expected to be interpreted [[redlink - relaterminism / retermination|relative to the vantage point of the two things being combined]], such that "Trotsky" plus "democracy" is expected to yield some result which would make sense from the <i>populational vantage point</i> of a group of Trotskyists, rather than the point of view of the overall Soviet Union or of any overseas country. However, at the same time, it is acceptable to code results which represent the action or path a particular group of people <i>would realistically take</i> and would be obligated to acknowledge as having been their choice if they were intellectually honest and wished to correctly understand history, as long as their vantage point is preserved. This means that in some cases it is acceptable to code routes which combine reactionary concepts to create reactionary propositions or strategies, if they serve an educational purpose of identifying and dissecting reactionary thinking or behavior. "Modest" proposals, while they can be used to criticize other ideologies, run into problems on a meta-ontological level in that when the concept pops up in any other socially-linked group of people with another ideology the standards which set them apart as obviously fake are no longer present and the element of irony is quickly lost; inside a group of Tories, the line between "modest proposal" and "[[redlink - it was just a joke|dogwhistle]] for secretly announcing similar real-world plan" becomes increasingly fine, or nonexistent. This should be considered a problem with the motif itself, rather than [[Philosophical Research:Schizophrenic point of view|SPoV]] or meta-ontological soundness.

[[Category:"Modest" proposals ontology]]

Ontology:Q2487 - Revision history

Reversedragon: combination: essay

Reversedragon: copy fake Item from Ontology:Q1729