Ontology:Q60,37 - Revision history

Reversedragon: Item number

2025-08-01T11:50:32Z

Item number

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:50, 1 August 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean compound"><li> {{ArticleTitle\|[S2] Materialist analyses cannot truly be owned - MX / ~~E:MaterialistAnalysesCannotBeOwned~~ }}		{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean compound"><li> {{ArticleTitle\|[S2] Materialist analyses cannot truly be owned - MX / Q60,37 }}
	<onlyinclude><dfn class="field_ML manual" data-dimension="S2" data-qid="~~618~~" data-numbersign="404" data-field="" data-series="" data-work="" data-chapter="" data-tale="" data-object="" data-note="" data-lexeme="">{{IS2}}{{#if: {{{1\|}}} \| [[E:~~Q618~~\|{{{1}}}]] \| [[E:~~Q618~~\|Materialist analyses cannot truly be owned]] }}{{WaveScore\|sum=1\|quilt=1\|ply=1}}</dfn></onlyinclude>		<onlyinclude><dfn class="field_ML manual" data-dimension="S2" data-qid="60,37" data-numbersign="404" data-field="" data-series="" data-work="" data-chapter="" data-tale="" data-object="" data-note="" data-lexeme="">{{IS2/MX}}{{#if: {{{1\|}}} \| [[E:Q60,37\|{{{1}}}]] \| [[E:Q60,37\|Materialist analyses cannot truly be owned]] }}{{WaveScore\|sum=1\|quilt=1\|ply=1}}</dfn></onlyinclude>
	</li></ol><!-- change summary template: copy or update fake Item from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN\|~~Q618~~]] --> __NOTOC__		</li></ol><!-- change summary template: copy or update fake Item from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN\|Q60,37]] --> __NOTOC__

	== Core characteristics ==		== Core characteristics ==

	<dl class="wikitable hue">		<dl class="wikitable hue">
	{{HueClaim \|P=item type\| {{Template:S2}} ~~\| Item without number [[Category:Items awaiting canonical ID]]~~ }}		{{HueClaim \|P=item type\| {{Template:S2}} }}
	{{HueRoster\|EP=PPPA/L\| {{E:MaterialistAnalysesCannotBeOwned}} \| [[E:MaterialistAnalysesCannotBeOwned]] }}		{{HueRoster\|EP=PPPA/L\| {{E:MaterialistAnalysesCannotBeOwned}} \| [[E:MaterialistAnalysesCannotBeOwned]] }}
	{{HueClaim \|EP=PPPA\| Materialist analyses of fiction are the only ones which cannot be attacked by capitalists \| No library of Alexandria can be burned which was never inherently Greek }}		{{HueClaim \|EP=PPPA\| Materialist analyses of fiction are the only ones which cannot be attacked by capitalists \| No library of Alexandria can be burned which was never inherently Greek }}
Line 38:		Line 38:

	<ol start="10249" class="hue clean">		<ol start="10249" class="hue clean">
	<li class="~~field_mdem~~" value="~~618~~" data-dimension="S2">Materialist analyses of fiction are the only ones which cannot be attacked by capitalists -> a little subjective, but a very interesting argument to step through. information which is empirically observable can never be copyrighted, no matter how bad copyright policies get. you can never truly copyright an observation such as that hydrogen and hydroxide make water, or the earth is round, or religion exists, or countries exist, or science fiction books in general exist. but how far does this go? given a complete enough ontology of every generic thing that exists, could you build a literary analysis of a work of fiction which is totally uncopyrightable to the point it can never be taken down by a copyright claim, as long as it is very clearly an analysis and not a copy of the work? I think there's reason to believe the answer is "yes". and if that's the case. every analysis of art which is based on somebody's academic theory of social construction and utopianism and ideals is vulnerable to being taken away from people when a group of bourgeoisie bands together and decides to make life difficult for people, but comparatively, Materialist analyses are impervious to this. a Third World country or cluster of workers can have all the Materialist analyses it wants to and they can never be taken away. it can build them all from the ground up at any time without needing to access anything or anyone in particular. Materialist analyses are the only thing that perfectly suits this disgusting world of copyright and spatial slot hierarchies and defining people as isolated pockets of wealth with legs and trying to divide concepts up into people and make them totally synonymous with toxic gatekeepers and claiming that China building civilization again in parallel to the United States is "[[E:China having products is stealing\|stealing]]" the inherent containment of concepts and culture-simply-existing into toxic individuals; if that's going to continue this is the one thing that can exist alongside all that and survive all that. Materialist analyses are even resilient to Marxisms fracturing into different blocs and denying things from each other. basically, if you want knowledge and palettes of artistic concepts to survive nearly anything, create a Materialist analysis and stay far, far away from artisanal conceptions of anything which even <em>open the door</em> for it to have an official shop or an official inventor. no library of Alexandria can be burned which was never inherently Greek.		<li class="field_ML" value="6037" data-dimension="S2">[[E:MaterialistAnalysesCannotBeOwned\|Materialist analyses cannot truly be owned]] / Materialist analyses of fiction are the only ones which cannot be attacked by capitalists -> a little subjective, but a very interesting argument to step through. information which is empirically observable can never be copyrighted, no matter how bad copyright policies get. you can never truly copyright an observation such as that hydrogen and hydroxide make water, or the earth is round, or religion exists, or countries exist, or science fiction books in general exist. but how far does this go? given a complete enough ontology of every generic thing that exists, could you build a literary analysis of a work of fiction which is totally uncopyrightable to the point it can never be taken down by a copyright claim, as long as it is very clearly an analysis and not a copy of the work? I think there's reason to believe the answer is "yes". and if that's the case. every analysis of art which is based on somebody's academic theory of social construction and utopianism and ideals is vulnerable to being taken away from people when a group of bourgeoisie bands together and decides to make life difficult for people, but comparatively, Materialist analyses are impervious to this. a Third World country or cluster of workers can have all the Materialist analyses it wants to and they can never be taken away. it can build them all from the ground up at any time without needing to access anything or anyone in particular. Materialist analyses are the only thing that perfectly suits this disgusting world of copyright and spatial slot hierarchies and defining people as isolated pockets of wealth with legs and trying to divide concepts up into people and make them totally synonymous with toxic gatekeepers and claiming that China building civilization again in parallel to the United States is "[[E:China having products is stealing\|stealing]]" the inherent containment of concepts and culture-simply-existing into toxic individuals; if that's going to continue this is the one thing that can exist alongside all that and survive all that. Materialist analyses are even resilient to Marxisms fracturing into different blocs and denying things from each other. basically, if you want knowledge and palettes of artistic concepts to survive nearly anything, create a Materialist analysis and stay far, far away from artisanal conceptions of anything which even <em>open the door</em> for it to have an official shop or an official inventor. no library of Alexandria can be burned which was never inherently Greek.
	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

Reversedragon: Reversedragon moved page Ontology:MaterialistAnalysesCannotBeOwned to Ontology:Q60,37: Entity number or thesis portal structure was not final

2025-08-01T11:40:38Z

Reversedragon moved page Ontology:MaterialistAnalysesCannotBeOwned to Ontology:Q60,37: Entity number or thesis portal structure was not final

← Older revision	Revision as of 11:40, 1 August 2025
(No difference)

Reversedragon: category

2025-08-01T11:04:10Z

Reversedragon: copy or update fake Item from Q4002

2025-08-01T10:59:25Z

copy or update fake Item from Q4002

New page

{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean compound"><li> {{ArticleTitle|[S2] Materialist analyses cannot truly be owned - MX / E:MaterialistAnalysesCannotBeOwned }}
<onlyinclude><dfn class="field_ML manual" data-dimension="S2" data-qid="618" data-numbersign="404" data-field="" data-series="" data-work="" data-chapter="" data-tale="" data-object="" data-note="" data-lexeme="">{{IS2}}{{#if: {{{1|}}} | [[E:Q618|{{{1}}}]] | [[E:Q618|Materialist analyses cannot truly be owned]] }}{{WaveScore|sum=1|quilt=1|ply=1}}</dfn></onlyinclude>
</li></ol> __NOTOC__

== Core characteristics ==

<dl class="wikitable hue">
{{HueClaim |P=item type| {{Template:S2}} }}
{{HueRoster|EP=PPPA/L| {{E:MaterialistAnalysesCannotBeOwned}} | [[E:MaterialistAnalysesCannotBeOwned]] }}
{{HueClaim |EP=PPPA| Materialist analyses of fiction are the only ones which cannot be attacked by capitalists | No library of Alexandria can be burned which was never inherently Greek }}
{{HueRoster|EP=P42| -- }} 
{{HueRoster|EP=P34| {{E:Q92}} | {{E:Q618/A|molecular anarchisms}} }} 
{{HueRoster|EP=P56| {{E:Q19,09}} }} 
{{HueRoster|EP=P3| -- }} 
{{HueRoster|EP=P4| -- }} 
{{HueRoster|EP=P5| -- }} 
</dl>

=== Components ===

<dl class="wikitable hue">
{{HueRoster|P=model combines claims| -- }}
</dl>

=== Use in thesis portals ===

<dl class="wikitable hue">
{{HueRoster|EP=P14| -- }}
</dl>

== Wavebuilder combinations ==

<dl class="wikitable hue data_wavebuild three">
{{WaveBuildNone| -- | -- | -- }} 
</dl>

== [[E:MaterialistAnalysesCannotBeOwned|Prototype]] notes ==

<ol start="10249" class="hue clean">
<li class="field_mdem" value="618" data-dimension="S2">Materialist analyses of fiction are the only ones which cannot be attacked by capitalists -> a little subjective, but a very interesting argument to step through. information which is empirically observable can never be copyrighted, no matter how bad copyright policies get. you can never truly copyright an observation such as that hydrogen and hydroxide make water, or the earth is round, or religion exists, or countries exist, or science fiction books in general exist. but how far does this go? given a complete enough ontology of every generic thing that exists, could you build a literary analysis of a work of fiction which is totally uncopyrightable to the point it can never be taken down by a copyright claim, as long as it is very clearly an analysis and not a copy of the work? I think there's reason to believe the answer is "yes". and if that's the case. every analysis of art which is based on somebody's academic theory of social construction and utopianism and ideals is vulnerable to being taken away from people when a group of bourgeoisie bands together and decides to make life difficult for people, but comparatively, Materialist analyses are impervious to this. a Third World country or cluster of workers can have all the Materialist analyses it wants to and they can never be taken away. it can build them all from the ground up at any time without needing to access anything or anyone in particular. Materialist analyses are the only thing that perfectly suits this disgusting world of copyright and spatial slot hierarchies and defining people as isolated pockets of wealth with legs and trying to divide concepts up into people and make them totally synonymous with toxic gatekeepers and claiming that China building civilization again in parallel to the United States is "[[E:China having products is stealing|stealing]]" the inherent containment of concepts and culture-simply-existing into toxic individuals; if that's going to continue this is the one thing that can exist alongside all that and survive all that. Materialist analyses are even resilient to Marxisms fracturing into different blocs and denying things from each other. basically, if you want knowledge and palettes of artistic concepts to survive nearly anything, create a Materialist analysis and stay far, far away from artisanal conceptions of anything which even <em>open the door</em> for it to have an official shop or an official inventor. no library of Alexandria can be burned which was never inherently Greek.
</li></ol>

== Usage notes ==



[[Category:LithoGraphIca core concepts ontology]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:04, 1 August 2025
Line 6:		Line 6:

	<dl class="wikitable hue">		<dl class="wikitable hue">
	{{HueClaim \|P=item type\| {{Template:S2}} }}		{{HueClaim \|P=item type\| {{Template:S2}} \| Item without number [[Category:Items awaiting canonical ID]] }}
	{{HueRoster\|EP=PPPA/L\| {{E:MaterialistAnalysesCannotBeOwned}} \| [[E:MaterialistAnalysesCannotBeOwned]] }}		{{HueRoster\|EP=PPPA/L\| {{E:MaterialistAnalysesCannotBeOwned}} \| [[E:MaterialistAnalysesCannotBeOwned]] }}
	{{HueClaim \|EP=PPPA\| Materialist analyses of fiction are the only ones which cannot be attacked by capitalists \| No library of Alexandria can be burned which was never inherently Greek }}		{{HueClaim \|EP=PPPA\| Materialist analyses of fiction are the only ones which cannot be attacked by capitalists \| No library of Alexandria can be burned which was never inherently Greek }}
	{{HueRoster\|EP=P42\| -- }} <!-- en: QID references -->		{{HueRoster\|EP=P42\| -- }} <!-- en: QID references -->
	{{HueRoster\|EP=P34\| {{E:Q92}} \| {{E:Q618/A\|molecular anarchisms}} }} <!-- en: field meta-Marxism -->		{{HueRoster\|EP=P34\| {{E:Q618/MX\|meta-ontology}} [[Category:meta-ontology ontology]] \| {{E:Q92}} \| {{E:Q618/A\|molecular anarchisms}} }} <!-- en: field meta-Marxism -->
	{{HueRoster\|EP=P56\| {{E:Q19,09}} }} <!-- en: QID references Materialism and Empirio-criticism (Lenin 1909) -->		{{HueRoster\|EP=P56\| {{E:Q19,09}} }} <!-- en: QID references Materialism and Empirio-criticism (Lenin 1909) -->
	{{HueRoster\|EP=P3\| -- }} <!-- en: sub-case of -->		{{HueRoster\|EP=P3\| -- }} <!-- en: sub-case of -->