Ontology:TsubouchiNetworkingSuccess - Revision history

Reversedragon: Immigrants are progress because they are desperate / combination: Never ... quit

2025-10-03T23:23:45Z

Immigrants are progress because they are desperate / combination: Never ... quit

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:23, 3 October 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{ArticleTitle\|[Z] The ripple effect: Networking for success - ES / E:TsubouchiNetworkingSuccess\|NoContents=y}}		{{ArticleTitle\|[Z] The ripple effect: Networking for success - ES / E:TsubouchiNetworkingSuccess\|NoContents=y}}
	<includeonly><onlyinclude><dfn class="field_exstruct" data-dimension="Z" data-qid="618" data-numbersign="404" data-field="" data-series="" data-work="" data-chapter="" data-tale="" data-object="" data-lexeme="">[[E:TsubouchiNetworkingSuccess\|<cite>The Ripple Effect</cite>]]<ins class="note author-year"> (Tsubouchi 2025)</ins>{{WaveScore\|sum=1\|quilt=1\|ply=1\|enddfn=1}}</onlyinclude></includeonly>{{HueNumberPreview\|E=TsubouchiNetworkingSucess}}<!--		<includeonly><onlyinclude><dfn class="field_exstruct" data-dimension="Z" data-qid="618"><data data-numbersign="404" data-field="" data-series="" data-work="" data-chapter="" data-tale="" data-object="" data-lexeme=""></data>[[E:TsubouchiNetworkingSuccess\|<cite>The Ripple Effect</cite>]]<ins class="note author-year"> (Tsubouchi 2025)</ins>{{WaveScore\|sum=1\|quilt=1\|ply=1\|enddfn=1}}</onlyinclude></includeonly>{{HueNumberPreview\|E=TsubouchiNetworkingSucess}}<!--
	duplication hint: copy fake Item from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN\|Demon-Haunted World]] -->		duplication hint: copy fake Item from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN\|Demon-Haunted World]] -->

	== Core characteristics ==		== Core characteristics ==

	<dl class="wikitable hue">		<dl class="wikitable hue">
	{{HueClaim \|P=item type\| {{Template:Z1}} }}		{{HueClaim \|P=item type\| {{Template:Z1}} }}
	{{HueRoster\|EP=PPPA/L\|lang=en\| {{E:TsubouchiNetworkingSucess}} \| [[E:TsubouchiNetworkingSuccess]] }}		{{HueRoster\|EP=PPPA/L\|lang=en\| {{E:TsubouchiNetworkingSucess}} \| [[E:TsubouchiNetworkingSuccess]] \| {{TTS\|tts=Tsubouchi-Networking-Success with one C\|E:TsubouchiNetworkingSucess\|E=TsubouchiNetworkingSucess}} (sic) }}
	{{HueRoster\|EP=PPPA\|lang=en\| The Ripple Effect: Networking for success (Tsubouchi 2025) }}		{{HueRoster\|EP=PPPA\|lang=en\| The Ripple Effect: Networking for success (Tsubouchi 2025) }}
	{{HueRoster\|EP=P42\| -- }} <!-- en: QID references -->		{{HueRoster\|EP=P42\| -- }} <!-- en: QID references -->
Line 21:		Line 22:
	</dl>		</dl>

	=== Bibliographic information (2025 ~~paperback~~) ===		=== Bibliographic information (2025 advance reading copy) ===

	<dl class="wikitable hue">		<dl class="wikitable hue">
Line 43:		Line 44:

	<!-- {{HueCSS}} --><ol class="hue clean">		<!-- {{HueCSS}} --><ol class="hue clean">
	</li><li {{~~IS1~~/ES/class}} value="618" data-pages="~~xiv~~">~~asdfsfsdf~~		</li><li {{IS2/ES/class}} value="618" data-pages="">It should never be easy to quit fast / "Never {{censor\|fucking}} quit"


	</li></ol>		</li></ol>
Line 51:		Line 51:

	<ol class="hue clean">		<ol class="hue clean">
	</li><li {{IS2/ES/class}} value="618" data-dimension="S2">~~It should never be easy to quit fast~~ / ~~"Never {{censor\|fucking}} quit" -~~> this is some really interesting advice. hand it to Goku, he'll probably succeed. hand it to a business, it's a real toss-up if will work out. hand it to Deng Xiaoping, he will make China functional for the next century. hand it to Marxist theorists, and if they really truly follow it they'll eventually invent Molecular Marxisms. the question becomes: why is it so acceptable to give up? why do we do that? if we just stopped giving up, and nobody ever "retired" from being a Marxist, where would we be? we have to first declare that making a conscious decision to retreat into your hole and only write books and {{~~em\|never~~}} come out and do anything else counts as retirement no matter how many books you write. and forming a tiny party whose activities are equivalent to a single individual writing useless books is also retirement. there is at least some teeny tiny step of being proactive above writing books -- I would hypothesize that this minimal step is something like getting all the world's theorists to actually engage in peer review and build up consensuses and start really slamming bogus books that can't somehow be substantiated as a legitimate choice of named Marxism per country characteristics, to the point that "~~revisionism" is genuinely not a bunch of local opinions and the whole world agrees on a concept of "pseudo-Marxism" in the same sense as~~ "pseudoscience". to the point that Trotskyists recognize revisionism in mainstream Marxism-Leninism, and mainstream Marxist-Leninists recognize revisionism in Trotskyism and they each try to push {{em\|each other}} to be better at realizing {{em\|each other's}} particular [[redlink\|named-Marxism-specific country characteristics]] toward the end of closing the gap between different Marxisms and creating some kind of [[E:international conference structure\|singular]] or [[E:anarchy (meta-Marxism)\|plural]] unity of Marxisms.<br />		<!-- </li><li {{IS2/ES/class}} value="618" data-dimension="S2">asdfsdf -->
	~~we have to first acknowledge that under these conditions there~~ are ~~barriers to leaving retirement. society in general is ruled by various Filaments, as unintentionally explained by this book, so it is always hard to pierce through them,~~ because ~~the Filaments will always be like "human human best-human authentic connection community friendship friendship relationship", the only [[E:shovel dream\|shovel dream]]~~ they can generate, even as the very same Filaments can easily bake in ignorance and oppression and toxic positivity and these super arbitrary definitions of who is "really" an ideal member of a particular fanbase or workplace or charity to where society becomes divided into a sea of "real humans" who get into Networks specifically by humaning better and a sea of "garbage humans" who are rejected as human for reasons far more arbitrary than any of the Filament wants to admit. the threat of "systemic problems" is always concealed in the state of "fun, happy Community" where they are not yet apparent, which is what truly entrenches all the bad stuff once it turns up; toxic systems emerge directly from sociality itself and people's desire to have friends or very hard-won connections that got them into a position over years and years and years, and their inability to let go of Progress On Building Community. in industrial societies Communism is always stuck fighting against sociality, as people are much more greatly connected by a spiderweb of arbitrary individual relationships than by any actual class subpopulation or even any named oppression. every attempt to organize people tears at the blue spiderweb and even by regular people will sometimes be perceived as an attack. at the same time, sociality leads people to some really dumb things, like thinking that [[E:protest brain\|being in a protest]] one day or one month will already have changed the next five to ten years. this is the "opening" or "crisis" that Trotskyists and Western-Marxists keep coveting. it isn't simply the inability to see the power of the bourgeoisie, it's the inability to realize society runs on networkisms and for a movement to truly survive that you have to throw the whole rest of your life and entire existence into each year potentially building some named Marxism of the future, and more than that, you can't just get killed in a conflict and significant numbers of theorists have to actually survive. permanent revolution has become permanent cold-war. we're looking at something more like whole seas of people informally seceding and building central party-nations that actually are forced to exist alongside islands of capitalism in the same country, and their success is truly based on whether they out-survive the blue islands and thus get people kicked out of the blue islands into nothingness to join the red islands. that's looking at it as Marxism-Dengism. some might find Marxism-Trotskyism more fun, because they can build red Lattices around the blue islands joining each region of Lattices across the world at whatever speed and do something more similar to traditional Leninist party activity. the only catch is that they have to be smart enough to realize that socialism in one country is an inevitable stage within Trotskyist transition if only at the level of creating the central party of each country-region and making it truly effective to the point it becomes okay to think bigger.
			</li><li {{IS2/MX/class}} value="618">Immigrants are progress because they are desperate

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>
Line 65:		Line 66:

	<dl class="wikitable hue data_wavebuild three">		<dl class="wikitable hue data_wavebuild three">
	{{WaveRoute\| -- \| -- \| {{E:TsubouchiNetworkingSucess}} }} <!-- en: From ?? ?? -->		{{WaveRoute\| Never {{censor\|f\|ucking\|tts2=fucking}} quit \| ?? \| {{E:TsubouchiNetworkingSucess}} }} <!-- en: From ?? ?? -->
	</dl>		</dl>


	[[Category:Existentialist-Structuralist tradition ontology]] [[Category:Sources found at used book sales (United States, 2020s)]]		[[Category:Existentialist-Structuralist tradition ontology]] [[Category:Sources found at used book sales (United States, 2020s)]]

Reversedragon: Reversedragon moved page Ontology:TsubouchiNetworkingSucess to Ontology:TsubouchiNetworkingSuccess: Misspelled title

2025-10-02T22:40:06Z

Reversedragon moved page Ontology:TsubouchiNetworkingSucess to Ontology:TsubouchiNetworkingSuccess: Misspelled title

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:40, 2 October 2025
(No difference)

Reversedragon: copy fake Item from Demon-Haunted World

2025-10-02T21:34:49Z

copy fake Item from Demon-Haunted World

New page

{{ArticleTitle|[Z] The ripple effect: Networking for success - ES / E:TsubouchiNetworkingSuccess|NoContents=y}}
<includeonly><onlyinclude><dfn class="field_exstruct" data-dimension="Z" data-qid="618" data-numbersign="404" data-field="" data-series="" data-work="" data-chapter="" data-tale="" data-object="" data-lexeme="">[[E:TsubouchiNetworkingSuccess|<cite>The Ripple Effect</cite>]]<ins class="note author-year"> (Tsubouchi 2025)</ins>{{WaveScore|sum=1|quilt=1|ply=1|enddfn=1}}</onlyinclude></includeonly>{{HueNumberPreview|E=TsubouchiNetworkingSucess}}
== Core characteristics ==

<dl class="wikitable hue">
{{HueClaim |P=item type| {{Template:Z1}} }}
{{HueRoster|EP=PPPA/L|lang=en| {{E:TsubouchiNetworkingSucess}} | [[E:TsubouchiNetworkingSuccess]] }}
{{HueRoster|EP=PPPA|lang=en| The Ripple Effect: Networking for success (Tsubouchi 2025) }}
{{HueRoster|EP=P42| -- }} 
{{HueRoster|EP=P34| {{E:Q618/ES|networking}} }} 
{{HueRoster|EP=P4| non-fiction work }} 
{{HueClaim |P=URL| -- }}
</dl>

== Bibliographic information ==

<dl class="wikitable hue">
{{HueClaim|P=author| David Tsubouchi }}
{{HueClaim|P=title (en)| The ripple effect: Networking for success |OP=citation style| APA }}
</dl>

=== Bibliographic information (2025 paperback) ===

<dl class="wikitable hue">
{{HueClaim|P=edition number| advance reading copy }}
{{HueClaim|P=publication date| 2025 }}
{{HueClaim|P=medium| paperback }}
{{HueClaim|P=page count| 203 |OP=method| greatest page number }}
{{HueClaim|P=page count| 216 |OP=method| stated in book }}
{{HueClaim|P=publisher| Jaguar Book Group | Simon & Schuster }}
{{HueClaim|P=printed in| United States }}
{{HueClaim|P=ISBN| 978-1-77852-433-2 }}
</dl>

== Prototype notes ==

<ol class="hue clean">
</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="618" data-dimension="S">(none)
</li></ol>

== Motifs ==

<ol class="hue clean">
</li><li {{IS1/ES/class}} value="618" data-pages="xiv">asdfsfsdf

</li></ol>

=== Motifs (subjective) ===

<ol class="hue clean">
</li><li {{IS2/ES/class}} value="618" data-dimension="S2">It should never be easy to quit fast / "Never {{censor|fucking}} quit" -> this is some really interesting advice. hand it to Goku, he'll probably succeed. hand it to a business, it's a real toss-up if will work out. hand it to Deng Xiaoping, he will make China functional for the next century. hand it to Marxist theorists, and if they really truly follow it they'll eventually invent Molecular Marxisms. the question becomes: why is it so acceptable to give up? why do we do that? if we just stopped giving up, and nobody ever "retired" from being a Marxist, where would we be? we have to first declare that making a conscious decision to retreat into your hole and only write books and {{em|never}} come out and do anything else counts as retirement no matter how many books you write. and forming a tiny party whose activities are equivalent to a single individual writing useless books is also retirement. there is at least some teeny tiny step of being proactive above writing books -- I would hypothesize that this minimal step is something like getting all the world's theorists to actually engage in peer review and build up consensuses and start really slamming bogus books that can't somehow be substantiated as a legitimate choice of named Marxism per country characteristics, to the point that "revisionism" is genuinely not a bunch of local opinions and the whole world agrees on a concept of "pseudo-Marxism" in the same sense as "pseudoscience". to the point that Trotskyists recognize revisionism in mainstream Marxism-Leninism, and mainstream Marxist-Leninists recognize revisionism in Trotskyism and they each try to push {{em|each other}} to be better at realizing {{em|each other's}} particular [[redlink|named-Marxism-specific country characteristics]] toward the end of closing the gap between different Marxisms and creating some kind of [[E:international conference structure|singular]] or [[E:anarchy (meta-Marxism)|plural]] unity of Marxisms.<br />
we have to first acknowledge that under these conditions there are barriers to leaving retirement. society in general is ruled by various Filaments, as unintentionally explained by this book, so it is always hard to pierce through them, because the Filaments will always be like "human human best-human authentic connection community friendship friendship relationship", the only [[E:shovel dream|shovel dream]] they can generate, even as the very same Filaments can easily bake in ignorance and oppression and toxic positivity and these super arbitrary definitions of who is "really" an ideal member of a particular fanbase or workplace or charity to where society becomes divided into a sea of "real humans" who get into Networks specifically by humaning better and a sea of "garbage humans" who are rejected as human for reasons far more arbitrary than any of the Filament wants to admit. the threat of "systemic problems" is always concealed in the state of "fun, happy Community" where they are not yet apparent, which is what truly entrenches all the bad stuff once it turns up; toxic systems emerge directly from sociality itself and people's desire to have friends or very hard-won connections that got them into a position over years and years and years, and their inability to let go of Progress On Building Community. in industrial societies Communism is always stuck fighting against sociality, as people are much more greatly connected by a spiderweb of arbitrary individual relationships than by any actual class subpopulation or even any named oppression. every attempt to organize people tears at the blue spiderweb and even by regular people will sometimes be perceived as an attack. at the same time, sociality leads people to some really dumb things, like thinking that [[E:protest brain|being in a protest]] one day or one month will already have changed the next five to ten years. this is the "opening" or "crisis" that Trotskyists and Western-Marxists keep coveting. it isn't simply the inability to see the power of the bourgeoisie, it's the inability to realize society runs on networkisms and for a movement to truly survive that you have to throw the whole rest of your life and entire existence into each year potentially building some named Marxism of the future, and more than that, you can't just get killed in a conflict and significant numbers of theorists have to actually survive. permanent revolution has become permanent cold-war. we're looking at something more like whole seas of people informally seceding and building central party-nations that actually are forced to exist alongside islands of capitalism in the same country, and their success is truly based on whether they out-survive the blue islands and thus get people kicked out of the blue islands into nothingness to join the red islands. that's looking at it as Marxism-Dengism. some might find Marxism-Trotskyism more fun, because they can build red Lattices around the blue islands joining each region of Lattices across the world at whatever speed and do something more similar to traditional Leninist party activity. the only catch is that they have to be smart enough to realize that socialism in one country is an inevitable stage within Trotskyist transition if only at the level of creating the central party of each country-region and making it truly effective to the point it becomes okay to think bigger.

</li></ol>

== Wavebuilder combinations ==

<dl class="wikitable hue data_wavebuild three">
{{WaveBuildNone| {{E:TsubouchiNetworkingSucess}} | -- | -- }} 
</dl>

=== Wavebuilder characterizations ===

<dl class="wikitable hue data_wavebuild three">
{{WaveRoute| -- | -- | {{E:TsubouchiNetworkingSucess}} }} 
</dl>

[[Category:Existentialist-Structuralist tradition ontology]] [[Category:Sources found at used book sales (United States, 2020s)]]