Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q21,40 - Revision history

Reversedragon: Ink brush Socialism is a peasant party

2026-09-13T10:14:39Z

Ink brush Socialism is a peasant party

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:14, 13 September 2026
Line 6:		Line 6:

	{{li\|I=S1/JC/ML\|tradition=MX onto JC\|Q=21,40\|Q2=2140}}ink-brush Socialism -> the motif of an [[EC:9k/RD/Q90\|apparent form of Marxism]] which tries to characterize "intellectuals" or experts that aren't owners as their own entire class, to the point something like the Workers' Party of Korea logo with three objects in it is appropriate. as you can see by a lot of things I say on my prototype I {{em\|partially}} believe in ink-brush Marxism but not entirely. I think that it's useful to make fine-grained class distinctions, especially in undeveloped countries where there will be either more real peasants or educated-unemployed peasants, but those distinctions don't give people a free ticket to support the non-proletarians and give them all a pass to do whatever they want. <s>the power of ink-brush Marxism is to hand Trotsky responsibilities</s><ref group="error" name="a"/><s> and make him obligated to support either the Soviet Union or East Germany at his choice rather than letting him go around claiming both of them "aren't Trotskyist enough" and [[E:newspaper Marxism\|they need to do what he says]].</s>		{{li\|I=S1/JC/ML\|tradition=MX onto JC\|Q=21,40\|Q2=2140}}ink-brush Socialism -> the motif of an [[EC:9k/RD/Q90\|apparent form of Marxism]] which tries to characterize "intellectuals" or experts that aren't owners as their own entire class, to the point something like the Workers' Party of Korea logo with three objects in it is appropriate. as you can see by a lot of things I say on my prototype I {{em\|partially}} believe in ink-brush Marxism but not entirely. I think that it's useful to make fine-grained class distinctions, especially in undeveloped countries where there will be either more real peasants or educated-unemployed peasants, but those distinctions don't give people a free ticket to support the non-proletarians and give them all a pass to do whatever they want. <s>the power of ink-brush Marxism is to hand Trotsky responsibilities</s><ref group="error" name="a"/><s> and make him obligated to support either the Soviet Union or East Germany at his choice rather than letting him go around claiming both of them "aren't Trotskyist enough" and [[E:newspaper Marxism\|they need to do what he says]].</s>

			</li></ol>

			== Ink brush Socialism is a three-estate system ==
			<ol class="hue clean {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}">

			{{li\|start=y\|I=S1/IV\|tradition=\|Q=21,40\|Q2=2140}}ink-brush Socialism / the triad (three-estate party) / the Socialist-Revolutionaries officially built their party on the 'triad': proletariat, peasantry, intelligentsia (Trotsky onto SRs) -> oh my gosh. the closer you look at the Russian Revolution (and the bourgeois revolutions of Europe, only after you've looked at the Russian Revolution) the more all the weird quirks of China and North Korea reveal themselves to be pre-Marxist things from older classes. this is {{em\|embarrassing}}.

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>
Line 12:		Line 19:
	<!--		<!--
	<ol class="hue clean {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}">		<ol class="hue clean {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}">

	~~{{li\|start=y\|I=S2/IV\|tradition=\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}~~

	</li></ol> -->		</li></ol> -->

Line 20:		Line 24:
	<ol class="hue clean terse {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}">		<ol class="hue clean terse {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}">
	{{li\|start=y		{{li\|start=y
	\|I=Z1/JC\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|JC\|J.C.}} / Juche-socialism (North Korea)		\|I=Z1/JC\|Q= 618\|Q2= 618}}{{TTS\|JC\|J.C.}} / Juche-socialism (North Korea)
	{{li\|I=Z1/DX\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|YSR\|Y.S.R.}} / Socialist-Revolutionaries (Russian Empire)		{{li\|I=Z1/DX\|Q= 618\|Q2= 618}}{{TTS\|YSR\|Y.S.R.}} / Socialist-Revolutionaries (Russian Empire)
			{{li\|I=S1/IV\|Q=49,41\|Q2=4941}}{{TTS\|IV\|Fourth}} / Trotsky
			{{li\|I=S1/IV\|Q= 618\|Q2= 618}}{{TTS\|IV » MX\|Fourth o'er M.X.\|title=Trotskyism oer meta-Marxism}} / prototype page errata (Trotskyism)
	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

Reversedragon: mark Stalinism / proofread

2026-09-13T10:00:00Z

mark Stalinism / proofread

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:00, 13 September 2026
Line 2:		Line 2:
	== Main entry ==		== Main entry ==
	{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}"><!-- inactive: {{int:hue-ixn-classname-DFy}} -->		{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}"><!-- inactive: {{int:hue-ixn-classname-DFy}} -->
	~~<!-- {{li\|start=y\|I=S1/IV\|tradition=\|Q=21,40\|Q2=2140}} -->~~

	<li ~~class~~=~~"field_ML" data~~-~~qid~~="21,40~~" value~~="2140~~" data~~-~~dimension=~~"S">ink-brush ~~Marxism~~ -> the motif of a Marxism which tries to characterize "intellectuals", experts~~, or Director types~~ that aren't owners as their own entire class, to the point something like the Workers' Party of Korea logo with three objects in it is appropriate. as you can see by a lot of things I say on my prototype I <em>partially~~</em>~~ believe in ink-brush Marxism but not entirely. I think that it's useful to make fine-grained class distinctions, especially in undeveloped countries where there will be either more real peasants or educated-unemployed peasants, but those distinctions don't give people a free ticket to support the non-proletarians and give them all a pass to do whatever they want. the power of ink-brush Marxism is to hand Trotsky responsibilities and make him obligated to support either the Soviet Union or East Germany at his choice rather than letting him go around claiming both of them "aren't Trotskyist enough" and [[E:newspaper Marxism\|they need to do what he says]].		{{li\|start=y\|I=S1/JC\|tradition=JC, YSR / Socialist-Revolutionaries\|Q=21,40\|Q2=2140}}ink-brush Socialism / ink-brush Marxism (in reference to "apparent forms of Marxism")

			{{li\|I=S1/JC/ML\|tradition=MX onto JC\|Q=21,40\|Q2=2140}}ink-brush Socialism -> the motif of an [[EC:9k/RD/Q90\|apparent form of Marxism]] which tries to characterize "intellectuals" or experts that aren't owners as their own entire class, to the point something like the Workers' Party of Korea logo with three objects in it is appropriate. as you can see by a lot of things I say on my prototype I {{em\|partially}} believe in ink-brush Marxism but not entirely. I think that it's useful to make fine-grained class distinctions, especially in undeveloped countries where there will be either more real peasants or educated-unemployed peasants, but those distinctions don't give people a free ticket to support the non-proletarians and give them all a pass to do whatever they want. <s>the power of ink-brush Marxism is to hand Trotsky responsibilities</s><ref group="error" name="a"/><s> and make him obligated to support either the Soviet Union or East Germany at his choice rather than letting him go around claiming both of them "aren't Trotskyist enough" and [[E:newspaper Marxism\|they need to do what he says]].</s>

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>
Line 17:		Line 18:

	== Ideologies or fields ==		== Ideologies or fields ==
	~~<!--~~
	<ol class="hue clean terse {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}">		<ol class="hue clean terse {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}">
	{{li\|start=y		{{li\|start=y
	\|I=Z1/IV\|Q=~~41,04~~\|Q2=~~4104~~}}{{TTS\|IV\|~~Fourth~~}} / ~~Trotskyism~~		\|I=Z1/JC\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|JC\|J.C.}} / Juche-socialism (North Korea)
	</li></ol> -->		{{li\|I=Z1/DX\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|YSR\|Y.S.R.}} / Socialist-Revolutionaries (Russian Empire)

			</li></ol>

			== Errors ==
			<references group="error">
			<ref name="a">Trotsky is not the one who needs to be "handed responsibilities" here. That would be the people being condoned in the three-class logos and slogans, who may or may not be protecting the Third-World republic at all.</ref>

			</references>

	== Wavebuilder combinations ==		== Wavebuilder combinations ==
Line 30:		Line 38:
	</dl>		</dl>

			<!--
	== Subpages or related scraps ==		== Subpages or related scraps ==
	~~<!--~~
	=== Nickels ===		=== Nickels ===
	* {{nickel/silent}} [[Research talk:5c/\|]]		* {{nickel/silent}} [[Research talk:5c/\|]]

Reversedragon: Reversedragon moved page Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q2140 to Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q21,40: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title

2026-09-13T09:40:40Z

Reversedragon moved page Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q2140 to Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q21,40: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title

← Older revision	Revision as of 09:40, 13 September 2026
(No difference)

Reversedragon: copy markup from FreeBogdanSyrotiuk

2026-09-13T09:40:18Z

copy markup from FreeBogdanSyrotiuk

New page

{{NextNineThousand|PPPA=ink-brush Marxism|E=Q21,40|User=RD|Contents=y}}
== Main entry ==
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}">


<li class="field_ML" data-qid="21,40" value="2140" data-dimension="S">ink-brush Marxism -> the motif of a Marxism which tries to characterize "intellectuals", experts, or Director types that aren't owners as their own entire class, to the point something like the Workers' Party of Korea logo with three objects in it is appropriate. as you can see by a lot of things I say on my prototype I <em>partially</em> believe in ink-brush Marxism but not entirely. I think that it's useful to make fine-grained class distinctions, especially in undeveloped countries where there will be either more real peasants or educated-unemployed peasants, but those distinctions don't give people a free ticket to support the non-proletarians and give them all a pass to do whatever they want. the power of ink-brush Marxism is to hand Trotsky responsibilities and make him obligated to support either the Soviet Union or East Germany at his choice rather than letting him go around claiming both of them "aren't Trotskyist enough" and [[E:newspaper Marxism|they need to do what he says]].

</li></ol>

== Related ==


== Ideologies or fields ==


== Wavebuilder combinations ==
<dl class="wikitable hue data_wavebuild three">

{{WaveBuild| {{E:Q618/ML|??}} | -- | -- }} 

</dl>

== Subpages or related scraps ==


[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]]