Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q21,82 - Revision history

Reversedragon: redirects

2026-03-25T00:11:53Z

redirects

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:11, 25 March 2026
Line 21:		Line 21:
	== Ideologies or fields ==		== Ideologies or fields ==

	* ML / mainstream Marxism-Leninism		<ol class="hue clean compound">
	* IV / Trotskyism		{{HueNumber\|Q41,03}} <!-- en: ML / mainstream Marxism-Leninism -->
	* A / anarchism		{{HueDomain\|Q41,04}} <!-- en: IV / Trotskyism -->
			{{HueNumber\|Q3300}} <!-- en: A / anarchism -->
			</ol>

	* A onto ML		* A onto ML
	* IV onto ML		* IV onto ML
Line 32:		Line 35:
	-->		-->
	[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]] <!-- page ends here. TTS-unfriendly numbers incoming		[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]] <!-- page ends here. TTS-unfriendly numbers incoming
	redirects: [[User:RD/9k/Q2182]]		redirects: [[User:RD/9k/Q2182]] [[Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q2182]]
	duplication hint: copy markup from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNNN\|9k/Q21,82]] -->		duplication hint: copy markup from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNNN\|9k/Q21,82]] -->

Reversedragon: Reversedragon moved page Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q2182 to Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q21,82: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title

2026-03-24T22:49:37Z

Reversedragon moved page Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q2182 to Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q21,82: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:49, 24 March 2026
(No difference)

Reversedragon: Reversedragon moved page Ontology talk:RD/9k/Q2182 to Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q2182 without leaving a redirect: Misspelled title

2026-03-24T22:49:17Z

Reversedragon moved page Ontology talk:RD/9k/Q2182 to Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q2182 without leaving a redirect: Misspelled title

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:49, 24 March 2026
(No difference)

Reversedragon: Reversedragon moved page User:RD/9k/Q2182 to Ontology talk:RD/9k/Q2182: Entity number or thesis portal structure was not final

2026-03-24T22:48:29Z

Reversedragon moved page User:RD/9k/Q2182 to Ontology talk:RD/9k/Q2182: Entity number or thesis portal structure was not final

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:48, 24 March 2026
(No difference)

Reversedragon: Hayashi

2026-03-18T03:22:02Z

Hayashi

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:22, 18 March 2026
Line 2:		Line 2:
	== Main entry ==		== Main entry ==
	{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean">		{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean">
	~~<!--{{li\|start=y\|I=S1/MX\|class=field_exstruct field_LGBT\|tradition=MX onto LR\|Q=34,60\|Q2=3460}}asdfsdf-->~~

	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_anarchy" data-~~tradition="A~~" data-qid~~="21,82~~" value~~="2182~~" data-dimension~~=~~"S2">~~The Communist Party of the Soviet Union was an unacceptable class society (2003) [https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/morpheus-basic-principles-of-anarchism#toc5] -> bold claim. I think there's a subtle difference here in how Trotskyists see this versus anarchists. anarchists are more likely to come out and say the equivalent of the CPSU being an unjustified class society comparable to feudal orders and capitalism, but Trotskyists are more likely to just claim that Bolshevism somehow hasn't been created yet although its central authority "shouldn't" be unjustified if it had been created. which inherently makes Trotskyists a lot closer to being respectable to me; they just barely fail to pass the bar.<br/>		{{li\|start=y\|I=S2/A\|tradition=A onto ML\|Q=21,82\|Q2=2182\|h4 = The {{TTS\|tts=Communist Party of the Soviet Union\|CPSU}} was a class hierarchy }} (anarchism) / The Communist Party of the Soviet Union was an unacceptable class society (2003) [https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/morpheus-basic-principles-of-anarchism#toc5] -> bold claim. I think there's a subtle difference here in how Trotskyists see this versus anarchists. anarchists are more likely to come out and say the equivalent of the CPSU being an unjustified class society comparable to feudal orders and capitalism, but Trotskyists are more likely to just claim that Bolshevism somehow hasn't been created yet although its central authority "shouldn't" be unjustified if it had been created. which inherently makes Trotskyists a lot closer to being respectable to me; they just barely fail to pass the bar.<br/>
	there's a big problem that comes up here between the so-called 'unjustified class society' of the Soviet Union and the need to keep ethnic groups from being scattered and assimilated. anarchists often don't quite discuss ethnic groups as physical populations, leaving that area to be taken over by separate postcolonial theories that may or may not like anarchism. at the point the postcolonial theorists are getting mad about something the anarchists often show up and start claiming that if the postcolonial theorists got mad there must be domination happening, oh no not The Real, oh no it's the ecologically inherent consequence of violating the Golden Rule. but it doesn't seem like anarchists actually like believing in material processes that lead to attacks on sovereignty and angry postcolonial theorists. the whole thing is left reacting to real material problems several steps too late after "hierarchies" have already had several steps to [[E:chunk competition (meta-Marxism)\|multiply exponentially and claim more ground]]. and afterward you always see anarchists scrambling around to claim that [[E:A population of slaves has no leader\|it's okay genocide happened as long as none of the oppressed people Created Hierarchies]].		there's a big problem that comes up here between the so-called 'unjustified class society' of the Soviet Union and the need to keep ethnic groups from being scattered and assimilated. anarchists often don't quite discuss ethnic groups as physical populations, leaving that area to be taken over by separate postcolonial theories that may or may not like anarchism. at the point the postcolonial theorists are getting mad about something the anarchists often show up and start claiming that if the postcolonial theorists got mad there must be domination happening, oh no not The Real, oh no it's the ecologically inherent consequence of violating the Golden Rule. but it doesn't seem like anarchists actually like believing in material processes that lead to attacks on sovereignty and angry postcolonial theorists. the whole thing is left reacting to real material problems several steps too late after "hierarchies" have already had several steps to [[E:chunk competition (meta-Marxism)\|multiply exponentially and claim more ground]]. and afterward you always see anarchists scrambling around to claim that [[E:A population of slaves has no leader\|it's okay genocide happened as long as none of the oppressed people Created Hierarchies]].

			{{li\|I=S2/IV\|tradition=IV onto ML\|Q=21,82\|Q2=2182\|h4 = The {{TTS\|tts=Communist Party of the Soviet Union\|CPSU}} was class society }} (Trotskyism) / The {{TTS\|tts=Communist Party of the Soviet Union\|CPSU}} was class rule -> there are a few "state capitalism" Trotskyists that essentially say this too. Hayashi, Tony Cliff, etc.

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>
Line 20:		Line 21:
	== Ideologies or fields ==		== Ideologies or fields ==

	* ~~(none)~~		* ML / mainstream Marxism-Leninism
			* IV / Trotskyism
			* A / anarchism
			* A onto ML
			* IV onto ML

	<!--== Full title for bookmarks (optional) ==		<!--== Full title for bookmarks (optional) ==

Reversedragon: copy markup from 9k/Q34,60

2026-03-18T02:46:56Z

copy markup from 9k/Q34,60

New page

{{NextNineThousand|PPPA=CPSU was class society|User=RD|E=Q21,82|Contents=y}}
== Main entry ==
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean">


</li><li class="field_anarchy" data-tradition="A" data-qid="21,82" value="2182" data-dimension="S2">The Communist Party of the Soviet Union was an unacceptable class society (2003) [https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/morpheus-basic-principles-of-anarchism#toc5] -> bold claim. I think there's a subtle difference here in how Trotskyists see this versus anarchists. anarchists are more likely to come out and say the equivalent of the CPSU being an unjustified class society comparable to feudal orders and capitalism, but Trotskyists are more likely to just claim that Bolshevism somehow hasn't been created yet although its central authority "shouldn't" be unjustified if it had been created. which inherently makes Trotskyists a lot closer to being respectable to me; they just barely fail to pass the bar.<br/>
there's a big problem that comes up here between the so-called 'unjustified class society' of the Soviet Union and the need to keep ethnic groups from being scattered and assimilated. anarchists often don't quite discuss ethnic groups as physical populations, leaving that area to be taken over by separate postcolonial theories that may or may not like anarchism. at the point the postcolonial theorists are getting mad about something the anarchists often show up and start claiming that if the postcolonial theorists got mad there must be domination happening, oh no not The Real, oh no it's the ecologically inherent consequence of violating the Golden Rule. but it doesn't seem like anarchists actually like believing in material processes that lead to attacks on sovereignty and angry postcolonial theorists. the whole thing is left reacting to real material problems several steps too late after "hierarchies" have already had several steps to [[E:chunk competition (meta-Marxism)|multiply exponentially and claim more ground]]. and afterward you always see anarchists scrambling around to claim that [[E:A population of slaves has no leader|it's okay genocide happened as long as none of the oppressed people Created Hierarchies]].

</li></ol>
== Related ==
<ol class="hue clean terse">
</li></ol></dl>

== Ideologies or fields ==

* (none)


[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]]