Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q2950 - Revision history

Reversedragon: subpage: did-they-win

2026-04-28T23:33:43Z

subpage: did-they-win

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:33, 28 April 2026
Line 18:		Line 18:

	== Subpages ==		== Subpages ==
			* [[EC:9k/RD/Q29,50/did-they-win429\|did-they-win]]

Reversedragon: formatting

2026-04-28T23:28:33Z

formatting

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:28, 28 April 2026
Line 2:		Line 2:
	== Main entry ==		== Main entry ==
	{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean">		{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean">
	~~<!-- {{li\|start=y\|I=Z1/A\|Q=3300\|Q2=3300\|h4=}} -->~~

	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_mdem" data-qid~~="29,50~~" value~~="2950~~" data-dimension~~=~~"M3">~~Is a Saiyan attack a social construct by earth people? / Is Saiyans attacking the earth a social construct by earth people? -> ~~field: existential materialism.~~ a question to probe one of the central fallacies of anarchism. anarchists and postcolonial theorists toss around "social construct", "social construct". but the actions of another population outside your population are not a social construct within your own population. if you live in China, all the awful things the United States does can't be regarded as a social construct, because they are materially happening, and material happenings have to be countered with material responses. likewise within the United States, Marxism in other countries cannot be treated as a social construct, it has to be regarded as something the whole country as a material object is doing for material reasons.<br />		{{li\|start=y\|I=M3/MX\|Q=29,50\|Q2=2950\|h4= Is an alien attack Earth's social construct? }} / Is a Saiyan attack a social construct by earth people? / Is Saiyans attacking the earth a social construct by earth people? (existential materialism) -><br/>
	note that this Item is a question, and ideologies that want to be total blockheads can respond to it with wrong answers as long as those answers fully incorporate all the information in the question. example: "of course a Saiyan attack is a social construct, all culture is made up and every country has the right to forcibly change another country's culture whenever it thinks that culture is bad". you can already see how [[Term:endocolonialism\|people's views]] on the origin of imperialism lead to things like beating up the Middle East and making it worse and worse rather than better.		a question to probe one of the central fallacies of anarchism. anarchists and postcolonial theorists toss around "social construct", "social construct". but the actions of another population outside your population are not a social construct within your own population. if you live in China, all the awful things the United States does can't be regarded as a social construct, because they are materially happening, and material happenings have to be countered with material responses. likewise within the United States, Marxism in other countries cannot be treated as a social construct, it has to be regarded as something the whole country as a material object is doing for material reasons.<br />
			note that this Item is a question, and ideologies that want to be total blockheads can respond to it with wrong answers as long as those answers fully incorporate all the information in the question. example: "of course a Saiyan attack is a social construct, all culture is made up and every country has the right to forcibly change another country's culture whenever it thinks that culture is bad". you can already see how [[Term:endocolonialism\|people's views on the origin of imperialism]] lead to things like beating up the Middle East and making it worse and worse rather than better.

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>
Line 20:		Line 20:


	[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]] <!-- page ends here. TTS-unfriendly numbers incoming		[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]] [[Category:Proposition book P-hen vol.1 pg.3 (RD)]] <!-- page ends here. TTS-unfriendly numbers incoming
	redirects: [[Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q2950]]		redirects: [[Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q2950]]
	duplication hint: copy markup from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN\|9k/Q29,50]] -->		duplication hint: copy markup from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN\|9k/Q29,50]] -->

Reversedragon: copy markup from 9k/Q29,50

2026-04-28T23:19:43Z

copy markup from 9k/Q29,50

New page

{{NextNineThousand|PPPA=anarchism|User=RD|E=Q29,50|Contents=y}}
== Main entry ==
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean">


</li><li class="field_mdem" data-qid="29,50" value="2950" data-dimension="M3">Is a Saiyan attack a social construct by earth people? / Is Saiyans attacking the earth a social construct by earth people? -> field: existential materialism. a question to probe one of the central fallacies of anarchism. anarchists and postcolonial theorists toss around "social construct", "social construct". but the actions of another population outside your population are not a social construct within your own population. if you live in China, all the awful things the United States does can't be regarded as a social construct, because they are materially happening, and material happenings have to be countered with material responses. likewise within the United States, Marxism in other countries cannot be treated as a social construct, it has to be regarded as something the whole country as a material object is doing for material reasons.<br />
note that this Item is a question, and ideologies that want to be total blockheads can respond to it with wrong answers as long as those answers fully incorporate all the information in the question. example: "of course a Saiyan attack is a social construct, all culture is made up and every country has the right to forcibly change another country's culture whenever it thinks that culture is bad". you can already see how [[Term:endocolonialism|people's views]] on the origin of imperialism lead to things like beating up the Middle East and making it worse and worse rather than better.

</li></ol>

== Related ==


== Ideology codes ==
* (none)

== Subpages ==

[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]]