Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q32,70 - Revision history

Reversedragon: The rights of man come not from the generosity of the state but from the hand of God

2026-06-09T13:37:18Z

The rights of man come not from the generosity of the state but from the hand of God

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:37, 9 June 2026
Line 4:		Line 4:

	{{li\|start=y\|I=F2/A\|tradition=A, ES\|Q=32,70\|Q2=3270\|h4= You are already free }} (anarchism) / Anarchism is acting as if you are already free / Freedom is using individual will to realize Anarchism -> well, here it is. a claim said by anarchists which says the thing I call [[User:RD/9k/Q73\|Existentialism]] [political agorism] is one specific form of Anarchism. (found in the context of an interview with David Graeber, who was claimed to be an anarchist at some point in time.) I think this claim is inherently contradictory such that it could not possibly be true. if anarchism is acting as if you are free, some people are already anti-vaccine, anti-immigrant, anti-Islam/anti-atheist Tories before they do that, and then they can do "anarchism" on top of being a Tory. so anarchism would then be a system where half of the population transitions to fascists with a fascist state and half of the population is anarchists and the fascists kill the anarchists (potentially). I think most anarchists would not say fascism is part of any anarchism, so this is not a definition which can actually mark off where anarchism starts and ends. on the other hand, the claim that anarchism generates Liberal-republicanism is more plausible, because nothing rules out Liberal-republicanism being what anarchism looks like in reality, and it doesn't rule out the possibility that anarchism generates Liberalism and Liberalism then generates fascism.		{{li\|start=y\|I=F2/A\|tradition=A, ES\|Q=32,70\|Q2=3270\|h4= You are already free }} (anarchism) / Anarchism is acting as if you are already free / Freedom is using individual will to realize Anarchism -> well, here it is. a claim said by anarchists which says the thing I call [[User:RD/9k/Q73\|Existentialism]] [political agorism] is one specific form of Anarchism. (found in the context of an interview with David Graeber, who was claimed to be an anarchist at some point in time.) I think this claim is inherently contradictory such that it could not possibly be true. if anarchism is acting as if you are free, some people are already anti-vaccine, anti-immigrant, anti-Islam/anti-atheist Tories before they do that, and then they can do "anarchism" on top of being a Tory. so anarchism would then be a system where half of the population transitions to fascists with a fascist state and half of the population is anarchists and the fascists kill the anarchists (potentially). I think most anarchists would not say fascism is part of any anarchism, so this is not a definition which can actually mark off where anarchism starts and ends. on the other hand, the claim that anarchism generates Liberal-republicanism is more plausible, because nothing rules out Liberal-republicanism being what anarchism looks like in reality, and it doesn't rule out the possibility that anarchism generates Liberalism and Liberalism then generates fascism.

			{{li\|I=S2/ES\|tradition=\|Q=32,70\|Q2=3270}}The rights of man come not from the generosity of the state but from the hand of God (John F. Kennedy) [https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/president-john-f-kennedys-inaugural-address]

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

Reversedragon: Reversedragon moved page Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q3270 to Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q32,70: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title

2026-06-09T13:35:04Z

Reversedragon moved page Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q3270 to Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q32,70: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:35, 9 June 2026
(No difference)

Reversedragon: formatting / terminology

2026-06-09T13:34:45Z

formatting / terminology

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:34, 9 June 2026
Line 2:		Line 2:
	== Main entry ==		== Main entry ==
	{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean">		{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean">
	~~<!-- {{li\|start=y\|I=S1/Ag\|tradition=Ag, ES\|Q=618\|h4= agorism }} -->~~

	<li ~~class~~=~~"field_anarchy" data-qid~~="32,70~~" value~~="3270~~" data-tradition~~=~~"A" data-dimension="F2">~~Anarchism is acting as if you are already free / Freedom is using individual will to realize Anarchism -> well, here it is. a claim said by anarchists which says the thing I call Existentialism is one specific form of Anarchism. (found in the context of an interview with David Graeber, who was claimed to be an anarchist at some point in time.) I think this claim is inherently contradictory such that it could not possibly be true. if anarchism is acting as if you are free, some people are already anti-vaccine, anti-immigrant, anti-Islam/anti-atheist Tories before they do that, and then they can do "anarchism" on top of being a Tory. so ~~Anarchism~~ would then be a system where half of the population transitions to fascists with a fascist state and half of the population is ~~Anarchists~~ and the fascists kill the ~~Anarchists~~ (potentially). I think most anarchists would not say fascism is part of any anarchism, so this is not a definition which can actually mark off where anarchism starts and ends. on the other hand, the claim that anarchism generates ~~Liberalism~~ is more plausible, because nothing rules out ~~Liberalism~~ being what anarchism looks like in reality, and it doesn't rule out the possibility that anarchism generates Liberalism and Liberalism then generates fascism.		{{li\|start=y\|I=F2/A\|tradition=A, ES\|Q=32,70\|Q2=3270\|h4= You are already free }} (anarchism) / Anarchism is acting as if you are already free / Freedom is using individual will to realize Anarchism -> well, here it is. a claim said by anarchists which says the thing I call [[User:RD/9k/Q73\|Existentialism]] [political agorism] is one specific form of Anarchism. (found in the context of an interview with David Graeber, who was claimed to be an anarchist at some point in time.) I think this claim is inherently contradictory such that it could not possibly be true. if anarchism is acting as if you are free, some people are already anti-vaccine, anti-immigrant, anti-Islam/anti-atheist Tories before they do that, and then they can do "anarchism" on top of being a Tory. so anarchism would then be a system where half of the population transitions to fascists with a fascist state and half of the population is anarchists and the fascists kill the anarchists (potentially). I think most anarchists would not say fascism is part of any anarchism, so this is not a definition which can actually mark off where anarchism starts and ends. on the other hand, the claim that anarchism generates Liberal-republicanism is more plausible, because nothing rules out Liberal-republicanism being what anarchism looks like in reality, and it doesn't rule out the possibility that anarchism generates Liberalism and Liberalism then generates fascism.

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

Reversedragon: copy markup from SquareOfNonAggressiveActivities

2026-06-09T13:29:40Z

copy markup from SquareOfNonAggressiveActivities

New page

{{NextNineThousand|PPPA=You are already free|User=RD|E=Q32,70|NoContents=y}}
== Main entry ==
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean">


<li class="field_anarchy" data-qid="32,70" value="3270" data-tradition="A" data-dimension="F2">Anarchism is acting as if you are already free / Freedom is using individual will to realize Anarchism -> well, here it is. a claim said by anarchists which says the thing I call Existentialism is one specific form of Anarchism. (found in the context of an interview with David Graeber, who was claimed to be an anarchist at some point in time.) I think this claim is inherently contradictory such that it could not possibly be true. if anarchism is acting as if you are free, some people are already anti-vaccine, anti-immigrant, anti-Islam/anti-atheist Tories before they do that, and then they can do "anarchism" on top of being a Tory. so Anarchism would then be a system where half of the population transitions to fascists with a fascist state and half of the population is Anarchists and the fascists kill the Anarchists (potentially). I think most anarchists would not say fascism is part of any anarchism, so this is not a definition which can actually mark off where anarchism starts and ends. on the other hand, the claim that anarchism generates Liberalism is more plausible, because nothing rules out Liberalism being what anarchism looks like in reality, and it doesn't rule out the possibility that anarchism generates Liberalism and Liberalism then generates fascism.

</li></ol>

== Related ==


== Ideologies or fields ==



[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]]