Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q5151 - Revision history

Reversedragon: re-unifying false separations between academic fields

2026-09-05T01:15:26Z

re-unifying false separations between academic fields

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:15, 5 September 2026
Line 62:		Line 62:
	{{li\|I=F2/Fy\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Art and science are different worlds -> I can prove to you they're not different. the method will be a little crude. why are racist Disney cartoons considered objectively incorrect? they are; that is almost indisputable. art is not just created to "express feelings". there really is representational art, which is objectively incorrect when it doesn't represent correctly. something which is objective in this sense has the same purpose as science. what kind of science it is studying can be a little unclear. but, no, there's such a thing as an anatomically wrong picture of a bluebird (which admittedly can be subjective, if it morphs into something imaginary) and there's such a thing as an objectively wrong portrayal of a demographic (which actually does have solid ranges of correct and incorrect answers).<br/>		{{li\|I=F2/Fy\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Art and science are different worlds -> I can prove to you they're not different. the method will be a little crude. why are racist Disney cartoons considered objectively incorrect? they are; that is almost indisputable. art is not just created to "express feelings". there really is representational art, which is objectively incorrect when it doesn't represent correctly. something which is objective in this sense has the same purpose as science. what kind of science it is studying can be a little unclear. but, no, there's such a thing as an anatomically wrong picture of a bluebird (which admittedly can be subjective, if it morphs into something imaginary) and there's such a thing as an objectively wrong portrayal of a demographic (which actually does have solid ranges of correct and incorrect answers).<br/>
	this has some very serious consequences if you just go and believe it, because out of 1,000 "worlds" that exist the people in control of the 1,000th can come up with reasons to discard all 999 other ones and render them all with no power to criticize it. the 1,000th world is the world of capital, [[E:spatial slot hierarchy (meta-Marxism)\|spatial slot hierarchies]], and [[E:agora (meta-Marxism)\|agoras]]. all the others scarcely even matter. even climate science. even social justice degrees. even the arts.		this has some very serious consequences if you just go and believe it, because out of 1,000 "worlds" that exist the people in control of the 1,000th can come up with reasons to discard all 999 other ones and render them all with no power to criticize it. the 1,000th world is the world of capital, [[E:spatial slot hierarchy (meta-Marxism)\|spatial slot hierarchies]], and [[E:agora (meta-Marxism)\|agoras]]. all the others scarcely even matter. even climate science. even social justice degrees. even the arts.

	{{li\|I=S1/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}re-unifying false separations between academic fields / tracing threads of relationality among these three disciplinary formations [https://alexamoulton.weebly.com/uploads/1/2/3/8/123805387/williams_et_al_2025__black_livingness_and_insurgent_ecological_politics.pdf] -> this article is really hard to read and yet it somehow seems to be better than what Goodman was saying. this seems to be a recurring problem whenever people study multiple regions of the world and add in either a tribal society or some Third World countries: the most divided thing is the departments of their universities, while the human populations are not quite as divided.

	{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=392\|Q2=392}}Most science is not empirical / A map does not recreate experience but discloses facts that are not obvious (Goodman, {{book\|Problems and Projects}}) [https://vanwynsberge.com/2025/01/21/the-art-of-worldbuilding-analyzing-nelson-goodmans-philosophy-of-worldmaking/] / ({{9k\|RD/Q392}}) -> okay. that's correct.		{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=392\|Q2=392}}Most science is not empirical / A map does not recreate experience but discloses facts that are not obvious (Goodman, {{book\|Problems and Projects}}) [https://vanwynsberge.com/2025/01/21/the-art-of-worldbuilding-analyzing-nelson-goodmans-philosophy-of-worldmaking/] / ({{9k\|RD/Q392}}) -> okay. that's correct.

Reversedragon: Ways of Worldmaking

2026-09-05T00:52:11Z

Ways of Worldmaking

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:52, 5 September 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{NextNineThousand\|PPPA=worldmaking\|E=~~Q618~~\|User=RD\|Contents=y}}		{{NextNineThousand\|PPPA=worldmaking\|E=Q51,51\|User=RD\|Contents=y}}
	== Main entry ==		== Main entry ==
	{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}"><!-- inactive: {{int:hue-ixn-classname-DFy}} -->		{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}"><!-- inactive: {{int:hue-ixn-classname-DFy}} -->

	{{li\|start=y\|I=S1/ES\|Q=~~618~~\|Q2=~~618~~\|h4= worldmaking }} -> what the hell is this. I've seen it like five times looking up weird political-agorist garbage. I'm not giving it its own Item number until I know what it is.<br/>		{{li\|start=y\|I=S1/ES\|Q=51,51\|Q2=5151\|h4= worldmaking }} -> what the hell is this. I've seen it like five times looking up weird political-agorist garbage. I'm not giving it its own Item number until I know what it is.<br/>
	world: ????<br/>		world: ????<br/>
	make: ????		make: ????

	{{li\|I=S1/ES\|Q=~~618~~\|Q2=~~618~~}}worldmaking / concepts related to worldmaking (sense) [https://www.dukeupress.edu/worldmaking] / studying race (generic) / psychoanalysis and racial identity (Kondo 2018; generic) / theater and media representation (generic) / race and economic forces (generic) / race and institutional hiring practices (generic) / ideologies of artistic transcendence (generic) / race and aesthetic form (generic)		{{li\|I=S1/ES\|Q=51,51\|Q2=5151}}worldmaking / concepts related to worldmaking (sense) [https://www.dukeupress.edu/worldmaking] / studying race (generic) / psychoanalysis and racial identity (Kondo 2018; generic) / theater and media representation (generic) / race and economic forces (generic) / race and institutional hiring practices (generic) / ideologies of artistic transcendence (generic) / race and aesthetic form (generic)

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>
Line 14:		Line 14:
	<ol class="hue clean {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}">		<ol class="hue clean {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}">

	{{li\|start=y\|I=Z1/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{book\|Worldmaking}} [https://worldmakingproject.substack.com/p/worldmaking] -> forgive me for adding this as an Item in an act of pettiness, when I gave the guideline that living people and their video channels shouldn't be coded unless they're prominent figures, but the claims of this blog are gigantic. you make a 'magazine' like this one, and it's actually begging for scrutiny.		{{li\|start=y\|I=Z1/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{book\|Worldmaking}} [https://worldmakingproject.substack.com/p/worldmaking] -> <s>forgive me for adding this as an Item in an act of pettiness, when I gave the guideline that living people and their video channels shouldn't be coded unless they're prominent figures, but the claims of this blog are gigantic. you make a 'magazine' like this one, and it's actually begging for scrutiny.</s><br/>
			oh. there are no posts on it. well that makes that question moot

	{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Cities, nations (populations? states?), and technological infrastructures (?) are worlds (Damjan Jovanovic)		{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Cities, nations (populations? states?), and technological infrastructures (?) are worlds (Damjan Jovanovic)
Line 46:		Line 47:

	{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Worldmaking circumvents the impossibility of criticizing unconscious systems by offering structures that can support new forms of thought and action -> I believe the "thought" part but not the "action" part. this sounds like it's trying to say it's better than anarchists spinning up utopias but absolutely hasn't thought it through enough to even be different.		{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Worldmaking circumvents the impossibility of criticizing unconscious systems by offering structures that can support new forms of thought and action -> I believe the "thought" part but not the "action" part. this sounds like it's trying to say it's better than anarchists spinning up utopias but absolutely hasn't thought it through enough to even be different.

			</li></ol>

			== Nelson Goodman ==
			<ol class="hue clean {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}">

			{{li\|start=y\|I=Z1/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{book\|Ways of Worldmaking}} (Nelson Goodman 1978) [https://worldmaking.xyz/Concepts/Worldmaking] -> oh my gosh did I actually find where it came from

			{{li\|I=Z1/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Worlds are constructed through symbols, as in language, science, and art (Goodman) [https://worldmaking.xyz/Concepts/Worldmaking] -> yes and no.

			{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Art and science are different worlds / Instead of there being a true world, worlds are plural because there are multiple ontologies of the world; this is to imply that art and science are different worlds where each world is judged by its own standards (Goodman) [https://worldmaking.xyz/Concepts/Worldmaking] -> so this {{em\|is}} postmodernism. oh my god. he was so close and then he gave up.<br/>
			so. are anarchists turning his work inside out and creating a new thing. is that what's going on? otherwise this whole thing doesn't make any sense at all. you can't claim that understanding worlds is useful for changing them if all of them are as good as all the others like Goodman says. but that isn't what the anarchist said.

			{{li\|I=F2/Fy\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Art and science are different worlds -> I can prove to you they're not different. the method will be a little crude. why are racist Disney cartoons considered objectively incorrect? they are; that is almost indisputable. art is not just created to "express feelings". there really is representational art, which is objectively incorrect when it doesn't represent correctly. something which is objective in this sense has the same purpose as science. what kind of science it is studying can be a little unclear. but, no, there's such a thing as an anatomically wrong picture of a bluebird (which admittedly can be subjective, if it morphs into something imaginary) and there's such a thing as an objectively wrong portrayal of a demographic (which actually does have solid ranges of correct and incorrect answers).<br/>
			this has some very serious consequences if you just go and believe it, because out of 1,000 "worlds" that exist the people in control of the 1,000th can come up with reasons to discard all 999 other ones and render them all with no power to criticize it. the 1,000th world is the world of capital, [[E:spatial slot hierarchy (meta-Marxism)\|spatial slot hierarchies]], and [[E:agora (meta-Marxism)\|agoras]]. all the others scarcely even matter. even climate science. even social justice degrees. even the arts.

			{{li\|I=S1/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}re-unifying false separations between academic fields / tracing threads of relationality among these three disciplinary formations [https://alexamoulton.weebly.com/uploads/1/2/3/8/123805387/williams_et_al_2025__black_livingness_and_insurgent_ecological_politics.pdf] -> this article is really hard to read and yet it somehow seems to be better than what Goodman was saying. this seems to be a recurring problem whenever people study multiple regions of the world and add in either a tribal society or some Third World countries: the most divided thing is the departments of their universities, while the human populations are not quite as divided.

			{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=392\|Q2=392}}Most science is not empirical / A map does not recreate experience but discloses facts that are not obvious (Goodman, {{book\|Problems and Projects}}) [https://vanwynsberge.com/2025/01/21/the-art-of-worldbuilding-analyzing-nelson-goodmans-philosophy-of-worldmaking/] / ({{9k\|RD/Q392}}) -> okay. that's correct.

			{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=392\|Q2=392}}Symbols make worldviews possible [https://vanwynsberge.com/2025/01/21/the-art-of-worldbuilding-analyzing-nelson-goodmans-philosophy-of-worldmaking/] [https://gptzero.me/] -> this is. this is a generated page. and I swear it was more coherent than the non-generated ones! oh no.

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

Reversedragon: takeaway (meta-Marxism) / Worldmaking circumvents the impossibility of criticizing unconscious systems

2026-09-02T08:26:29Z

takeaway (meta-Marxism) / Worldmaking circumvents the impossibility of criticizing unconscious systems

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:26, 2 September 2026
Line 15:		Line 15:

	{{li\|start=y\|I=Z1/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{book\|Worldmaking}} [https://worldmakingproject.substack.com/p/worldmaking] -> forgive me for adding this as an Item in an act of pettiness, when I gave the guideline that living people and their video channels shouldn't be coded unless they're prominent figures, but the claims of this blog are gigantic. you make a 'magazine' like this one, and it's actually begging for scrutiny.		{{li\|start=y\|I=Z1/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{book\|Worldmaking}} [https://worldmakingproject.substack.com/p/worldmaking] -> forgive me for adding this as an Item in an act of pettiness, when I gave the guideline that living people and their video channels shouldn't be coded unless they're prominent figures, but the claims of this blog are gigantic. you make a 'magazine' like this one, and it's actually begging for scrutiny.

			{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Cities, nations (populations? states?), and technological infrastructures (?) are worlds (Damjan Jovanovic)

	{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Worlds organize behavior before people make conscious choices, creating values (required beliefs) through structure rather than proclamation (Damjan Jovanovic) / We live inside worlds we did not choose (generic) -> so, the problem with any idea like this is, how will you ever get anyone to understand worldmaking beyond about 5 people if worlds are always modifying their choices before they can choose to adopt worldmaker theory? how did {{em\|you}} ever discover worldmaker theory if you too were born absorbed into a particular world?		{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Worlds organize behavior before people make conscious choices, creating values (required beliefs) through structure rather than proclamation (Damjan Jovanovic) / We live inside worlds we did not choose (generic) -> so, the problem with any idea like this is, how will you ever get anyone to understand worldmaking beyond about 5 people if worlds are always modifying their choices before they can choose to adopt worldmaker theory? how did {{em\|you}} ever discover worldmaker theory if you too were born absorbed into a particular world?

	{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Worlds organize behavior ... through structure -> define "structure". I know this is something people have gotten upset with me about too at times, but at least I can give a lengthy list of everything I can possibly think of that counts as a social structure and exactly what kind of structure it is with what kind of role or effect making it either significant or insignificant; when I do it, it's to get people to understand the absolute most fundamental concepts of what a society is outside the boxes of Communist theory and Liberal-republican theory before they make bigger statements.		{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Worlds organize behavior ... through structure -> define "structure". I know this is something people have gotten upset with me about too at times, but at least I can give a lengthy list of everything I can possibly think of that counts as a social structure and exactly what kind of structure it is with what kind of role or effect making it either significant or insignificant; when I do it, it's to get people to understand the absolute most fundamental concepts of what a society is outside the boxes of Communist theory and Liberal-republican theory before they make bigger statements.

			{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}The inherited worlds of the last century no longer align with the conditions they govern -> how is that possible? you said that worlds are something people simply exist in as structures that capture objects' existences, which would mean there is no actual separation between "inherited worlds" and "what they govern" apart from how badly they mistreat the physical objects inside. like, isn't the point of "worlds" that worlds {{em\|are}} conditions?<br/>
			all of the examples given seem to suggest the misaligned part is the ultimate results of the worlds, not the conditions they act on which would also be created by them.

	{{li\|I=S2/A\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Each World contains distinctions of what is Good or Bad (an ethics; a morality; what is rewarded or not rewarded or punished; a set of ground rules), which are crafted through the structure of the World rather than through intentional design; this is to imply that some forms of structure create extractive relationships with nature correlating with the value that nature is a resource; this is to imply that some forms of structure create domination correlating with the value of centers of control; this is to imply that some forms of structure obscure themselves correlating with disorientation; this is to imply that understanding the genesis of Worlds allows creating new worlds and new futures (Damjan Jovanovic) -><br/>		{{li\|I=S2/A\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Each World contains distinctions of what is Good or Bad (an ethics; a morality; what is rewarded or not rewarded or punished; a set of ground rules), which are crafted through the structure of the World rather than through intentional design; this is to imply that some forms of structure create extractive relationships with nature correlating with the value that nature is a resource; this is to imply that some forms of structure create domination correlating with the value of centers of control; this is to imply that some forms of structure obscure themselves correlating with disorientation; this is to imply that understanding the genesis of Worlds allows creating new worlds and new futures (Damjan Jovanovic) -><br/>
Line 24:		Line 29:
	it sounds like anarchism. these examples are all recycled anarchist talking points.		it sounds like anarchism. these examples are all recycled anarchist talking points.

	{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}~~Cities, nations~~ (~~populations? states?~~), ~~and technological infrastructures (?) are worlds (Damjan Jovanovic)~~		{{li\|I=S2/A/ML\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}optimization advances faster than meaning (ontological understanding; orientation) -> again, this is coherent. it's really nothing new but at least it means something.

	{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}For much of human history worlds were inherited but now they are designed (Damjan Jovanovic) -> that seems doubtful. I think if there's such a thing they're still inherited a whole lot of the time.		{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}For much of human history worlds were inherited but now they are designed (Damjan Jovanovic) -> that seems doubtful. I think if there's such a thing they're still inherited a whole lot of the time.
Line 33:		Line 38:

	{{li\|I=S1/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}myth and narrative as technologies / games and simulations as worldmaking systems (generic) / artificial intelligence as a perceptual and cosmological apparatus (generic) / utopias as working hypotheses (generic) -> this is one of the most coherent things I have heard these people say. yes, narratives and representational art in general are technologies that fulfill a purpose.		{{li\|I=S1/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}myth and narrative as technologies / games and simulations as worldmaking systems (generic) / artificial intelligence as a perceptual and cosmological apparatus (generic) / utopias as working hypotheses (generic) -> this is one of the most coherent things I have heard these people say. yes, narratives and representational art in general are technologies that fulfill a purpose.

			{{li\|I=S1/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}myth and narrative as technologies / Architecture, games, cinema, design, systems theory, ecology, mythology, and artificial intelligence increasingly address the same structural questions (Damjan Jovanovic) [https://worldmakingproject.substack.com/p/worldmaking] -> well... half of that addresses slightly different things from the other half, but yeah.

			{{li\|I=F2/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Culture now simulates reality / Cultural production used to focus on representing the world through static images of what has existed, but now it operates through constructing operational models of reality, which means that static and interactive media are converging -> I think your understanding changed rather than cultural production changing.

	{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Worlds are narratives / Worlds in "worldmaker theory" and narratives in postmodernism are the same thing		{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Worlds are narratives / Worlds in "worldmaker theory" and narratives in postmodernism are the same thing

			{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Worldmaking circumvents the impossibility of criticizing unconscious systems by offering structures that can support new forms of thought and action -> I believe the "thought" part but not the "action" part. this sounds like it's trying to say it's better than anarchists spinning up utopias but absolutely hasn't thought it through enough to even be different.

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

	== Related ==		== Related ==
	~~<!--~~
	<ol class="hue clean {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}">		<ol class="hue clean {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}">

			{{li\|start=y\|I=S1/MX\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}takeaway (meta-Marxism) / letter to Celestia (meta-Marxism) -> there is a specific reason I have a low opinion of almost all philosophy that exists today and isn't Communism. it's that it never explains what the heck it even refers to. if you're going to introduce your philosophy with a claim that all words are only defined relative to others, fine, that's great. but I still have to be able to take the antagonism of two or three opposites you've presented and find what real-world things they {{em\|both simultaneously}} refer to in a bisimilar relationship.<br/>
			what is a "narrative"? what is a "world"? what is a "discourse"? are "narratives" the same thing as "discourses"? are "narratives" the same thing as "worlds"? you have to define what the hell you're talking about clearly enough that I can tell whether two different frameworks are or aren't modeling the same thing.

			{{li\|I=S1/Fy\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}letter to Celestia (meta-Marxism) -> oh gosh you know what. I should, just as a very funny joke with nobody but me, make the 'regular' page for "letter to Celestia", but under that 9k page, I start putting joke summaries of motifs in blue ideologies that are all written as if Twilight is speaking. gosh after anarchism is so unintentionally depressing that might be the only thing that could make me feel better. there are few things funnier than hearing 'Dear Princess Celestia' in the wrong place. that is actually a top-tier joke

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>
	~~-->~~
	== Ideologies or fields ==		== Ideologies or fields ==
	<ol class="hue clean terse {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}">		<ol class="hue clean terse {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}">

Reversedragon: meta-ontology

2026-09-02T07:38:51Z

meta-ontology

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:38, 2 September 2026
Line 16:		Line 16:
	{{li\|start=y\|I=Z1/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{book\|Worldmaking}} [https://worldmakingproject.substack.com/p/worldmaking] -> forgive me for adding this as an Item in an act of pettiness, when I gave the guideline that living people and their video channels shouldn't be coded unless they're prominent figures, but the claims of this blog are gigantic. you make a 'magazine' like this one, and it's actually begging for scrutiny.		{{li\|start=y\|I=Z1/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{book\|Worldmaking}} [https://worldmakingproject.substack.com/p/worldmaking] -> forgive me for adding this as an Item in an act of pettiness, when I gave the guideline that living people and their video channels shouldn't be coded unless they're prominent figures, but the claims of this blog are gigantic. you make a 'magazine' like this one, and it's actually begging for scrutiny.

	{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Worlds organize behavior before people make conscious choices (Damjan Jovanovic) / We live inside worlds we did not choose (generic) -> so, the problem with any idea like this is, how will you ever get anyone to understand worldmaking beyond about 5 people if worlds are always modifying their choices before they can choose to adopt worldmaker theory? how did {{em\|you}} ever discover worldmaker theory if you too were born absorbed into a particular world?		{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Worlds organize behavior before people make conscious choices, creating values (required beliefs) through structure rather than proclamation (Damjan Jovanovic) / We live inside worlds we did not choose (generic) -> so, the problem with any idea like this is, how will you ever get anyone to understand worldmaking beyond about 5 people if worlds are always modifying their choices before they can choose to adopt worldmaker theory? how did {{em\|you}} ever discover worldmaker theory if you too were born absorbed into a particular world?

			{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Worlds organize behavior ... through structure -> define "structure". I know this is something people have gotten upset with me about too at times, but at least I can give a lengthy list of everything I can possibly think of that counts as a social structure and exactly what kind of structure it is with what kind of role or effect making it either significant or insignificant; when I do it, it's to get people to understand the absolute most fundamental concepts of what a society is outside the boxes of Communist theory and Liberal-republican theory before they make bigger statements.

			{{li\|I=S2/A\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Each World contains distinctions of what is Good or Bad (an ethics; a morality; what is rewarded or not rewarded or punished; a set of ground rules), which are crafted through the structure of the World rather than through intentional design; this is to imply that some forms of structure create extractive relationships with nature correlating with the value that nature is a resource; this is to imply that some forms of structure create domination correlating with the value of centers of control; this is to imply that some forms of structure obscure themselves correlating with disorientation; this is to imply that understanding the genesis of Worlds allows creating new worlds and new futures (Damjan Jovanovic) -><br/>
			so, like, is this thing properly meta- or is it not? I genuinely cannot tell. I know how to word it to make it {{em\|sound}} smart, but I have no idea if the people who made it understand it that way.<br/>
			it sounds like anarchism. these examples are all recycled anarchist talking points.

	{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Cities, nations (populations? states?), and technological infrastructures (?) are worlds (Damjan Jovanovic)		{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Cities, nations (populations? states?), and technological infrastructures (?) are worlds (Damjan Jovanovic)
Line 38:		Line 44:
	-->		-->
	== Ideologies or fields ==		== Ideologies or fields ==
	~~<!--~~ <ol class="hue clean terse {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}">		<ol class="hue clean terse {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}">
	{{li\|start=y		{{li\|start=y
	\|I=S1/ES\|Q=42\|Q2=42}}{{TTS\|ES\|~~E.S.~~}} / ~~existentialism~~		\|I=S1/MX\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|MX\|meta-Marxism}} / meta-ontology
	</li></ol~~> -->~~		</li></ol>
	~~<!--~~
	~~{{li\|start=y~~
	~~\|I=S1/MN\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|MN\|M.N.}} / early Marxism --~~>
	<!--		<!--
	== Wavebuilder combinations ==		== Wavebuilder combinations ==

Reversedragon: worldmaking

2026-09-02T07:18:50Z

worldmaking

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 {{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean  {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}"><!-- inactive:  {{int:hue-ixn-classname-DFy}} -->
-{{li|start=y|I=S1/ES|Q=618|Q2=618|h4-rem=}}worldmaking
+{{li|start=y|I=S1/ES|Q=618|Q2=618|h4= worldmaking }}  ->  what the hell is this. I've seen it like five times looking up weird political-agorist garbage. I'm not giving it its own Item number until I know what it is.<br/>
 </li></ol>

Reversedragon: copy markup from Q29,65

2026-09-02T06:50:35Z

copy markup from Q29,65

New page

{{NextNineThousand|PPPA=worldmaking|E=Q618|User=RD|Contents=y}}
== Main entry ==
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}">

{{li|start=y|I=S1/ES|Q=618|Q2=618|h4-rem=}}worldmaking

</li></ol>

== Related ==

== Ideologies or fields ==




== Subpages or related scraps ==


[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:15, 5 September 2026
Line 62:		Line 62:
	{{li\|I=F2/Fy\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Art and science are different worlds -> I can prove to you they're not different. the method will be a little crude. why are racist Disney cartoons considered objectively incorrect? they are; that is almost indisputable. art is not just created to "express feelings". there really is representational art, which is objectively incorrect when it doesn't represent correctly. something which is objective in this sense has the same purpose as science. what kind of science it is studying can be a little unclear. but, no, there's such a thing as an anatomically wrong picture of a bluebird (which admittedly can be subjective, if it morphs into something imaginary) and there's such a thing as an objectively wrong portrayal of a demographic (which actually does have solid ranges of correct and incorrect answers).<br/>		{{li\|I=F2/Fy\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Art and science are different worlds -> I can prove to you they're not different. the method will be a little crude. why are racist Disney cartoons considered objectively incorrect? they are; that is almost indisputable. art is not just created to "express feelings". there really is representational art, which is objectively incorrect when it doesn't represent correctly. something which is objective in this sense has the same purpose as science. what kind of science it is studying can be a little unclear. but, no, there's such a thing as an anatomically wrong picture of a bluebird (which admittedly can be subjective, if it morphs into something imaginary) and there's such a thing as an objectively wrong portrayal of a demographic (which actually does have solid ranges of correct and incorrect answers).<br/>
	this has some very serious consequences if you just go and believe it, because out of 1,000 "worlds" that exist the people in control of the 1,000th can come up with reasons to discard all 999 other ones and render them all with no power to criticize it. the 1,000th world is the world of capital, [[E:spatial slot hierarchy (meta-Marxism)\|spatial slot hierarchies]], and [[E:agora (meta-Marxism)\|agoras]]. all the others scarcely even matter. even climate science. even social justice degrees. even the arts.		this has some very serious consequences if you just go and believe it, because out of 1,000 "worlds" that exist the people in control of the 1,000th can come up with reasons to discard all 999 other ones and render them all with no power to criticize it. the 1,000th world is the world of capital, [[E:spatial slot hierarchy (meta-Marxism)\|spatial slot hierarchies]], and [[E:agora (meta-Marxism)\|agoras]]. all the others scarcely even matter. even climate science. even social justice degrees. even the arts.

	{{li\|I=S1/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}re-unifying false separations between academic fields / tracing threads of relationality among these three disciplinary formations [https://alexamoulton.weebly.com/uploads/1/2/3/8/123805387/williams_et_al_2025__black_livingness_and_insurgent_ecological_politics.pdf] -> this article is really hard to read and yet it somehow seems to be better than what Goodman was saying. this seems to be a recurring problem whenever people study multiple regions of the world and add in either a tribal society or some Third World countries: the most divided thing is the departments of their universities, while the human populations are not quite as divided.

	{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=392\|Q2=392}}Most science is not empirical / A map does not recreate experience but discloses facts that are not obvious (Goodman, {{book\|Problems and Projects}}) [https://vanwynsberge.com/2025/01/21/the-art-of-worldbuilding-analyzing-nelson-goodmans-philosophy-of-worldmaking/] / ({{9k\|RD/Q392}}) -> okay. that's correct.		{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=392\|Q2=392}}Most science is not empirical / A map does not recreate experience but discloses facts that are not obvious (Goodman, {{book\|Problems and Projects}}) [https://vanwynsberge.com/2025/01/21/the-art-of-worldbuilding-analyzing-nelson-goodmans-philosophy-of-worldmaking/] / ({{9k\|RD/Q392}}) -> okay. that's correct.