Reversedragon: Making a choice is the opposite of predetermination

2026-05-26T04:13:09Z

Making a choice is the opposite of predetermination

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:13, 26 May 2026
Line 2:		Line 2:
	== Main entries ==		== Main entries ==
	{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean field_exstruct">		{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean field_exstruct">
	~~<!-- {{li\|start=y\|I=S1/ES\|Q=660\|Q2=660\|h4= morality or ethics }} -->~~

	</~~li><li class~~=~~"field_fantasy" value~~="5601~~" data-remark~~=~~"5600" data-dimension="S"><cite>~~The Owl House~~</cite>~~ -> a lot of people liked this show and I'm just like... hmm no. it looks like it's a good show? but. gosh, why does it prompt so many video essays about Existentialism that even reference early-existentialism by name. I don't think this show was aimed at me.		{{li\|start=y\|I=Z1/Fy\|Q=56,01\|Q2=5601\|h4= {{film\|The Owl House}} }} -> a lot of people liked this show and I'm just like... hmm no. it looks like it's a good show? but. gosh, why does it prompt so many video essays about Existentialism that even reference early-existentialism by name. I don't think this show was aimed at me.

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

	== Related ==		== Related ==
	~~<!--~~
	<ol class="hue clean">		<ol class="hue clean">
	</li></ol> -->
			{{li\|start=y\|I=F2/ES\|Q=56,02\|Q2=5602}}If everyone wanted someone to choose them, no one would achieve anything -> nah. this isn't inspiring. when there's capitalism a great many people's life stories are about searching all over to get chosen by someone and how inspirational it is to hear about someone getting chosen. what is going to a university and getting hired for an exclusive "opportunity" as one of the brightest experts if it isn't being a chosen one? our fantasy books reflect our societies and class structures.<br />
			edit: gosh. this is false. this is actually false, because if you duplex it, capitalists are waiting for employees to choose them and employees are waiting for capitalists to choose them. everyone is. it's more like if nobody wanted somebody to pick them out as the chosen one <em>nobody</em> would achieve anything.

			{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=56,03\|Q2=5603}}People created monarchies because they believe in predetermination -> whoa whoa whoa. this isn't simply the truth, this is an Existentialist statement. many versions of Christianity see the Christian god as a Subject that actually responds to the overall state of earth, so no, even the divine right of kings isn't equal to predetermination. it only equals doing the thing the smartest or most capable person ever to exist would do in people's opinion. you can begin to see where all the anti-science propositions come from: that anyone trying to exert control over anyone else OR trying to claim more expertise than anyone else is preaching predetermination. this is a dangerous proposition, because it's exactly what gets science defunded by reactionaries, and climate change scenarios rejected, and disabled people stuck in their houses when people wouldn't get COVID vaccines. all of that ties directly back to Existentialism and how the notions of choices and freedom are absorbed by reactionaries.

			{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=56,04\|Q2=5604}}Making a choice is the opposite of predetermination -> this one is fairer. it seems probably untrue — you've got relaterminism going on in your head retermining your actions — but is more difficult to decide as clearly true or false.

			{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=56,05\|Q2=5605}}Early-existentialism is the opposite of predetermination -> some people distinctly seem to treat (early-)existentialism as a single proposition rather than a field of philosophers. the funny thing is that everyone explains the contents of the proposition a little differently. thus making the single proposition back into a field of philosophy containing many propositions. in an act of pettiness, I might label this statement false in the strict binary logic sense, purely because it can be demonstrated to be a category error.

			{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=56,06\|Q2=5606}}Choices are identical with character development (fiction) / Choices are identical with Subject formation (real-life psychology)

			{{li\|I=S2/ES\|Q=56,07\|Q2=5607}}Individuals express themselves through the people around them -> one of the sharpest things I heard in an Existentialist video. you really have to pick this apart and look at it though. at first glance it looks like an acknowledgement of [[Term:reterminism\|relaterminism]]: people don't choose everything about themselves, so finding good friends that fill in the gaps in you is important. then you look at it closer and you realize there are much worse interpretations of it. one is that our main character is determining the presence of the other characters and vice versa and they are all <em>choosing</em> to be together. that's a bit disgusting. it allows people to come together and express themselves through their connection and then be prejudiced against other groups of people because being prejudiced is their authentic self. if you think that can't be someone's authentic self at least at one particular moment in time then you have never actually met a reactionary. just like a Goth kid, they will insist that even if it's a phase bigotry is exactly who they are.

			</li></ol>

	== Ideologies or fields ==		== Ideologies or fields ==

Reversedragon: copy markup from Q660

2026-05-26T03:59:16Z

copy markup from Q660

New page

{{NextNineThousand|PPPA=The Owl House|User=RD|E=Q56,01|Contents=y}}
== Main entries ==
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean field_exstruct">


</li><li class="field_fantasy" value="5601" data-remark="5600" data-dimension="S"><cite>The Owl House</cite> -> a lot of people liked this show and I'm just like... hmm no. it looks like it's a good show? but. gosh, why does it prompt so many video essays about Existentialism that even reference early-existentialism by name. I don't think this show was aimed at me.

</li></ol>

== Related ==


== Ideologies or fields ==
<ol class="hue clean terse field_exstruct">
{{li|start=y
|I=Z1/Fy|Q=618|Q2=618}}{{TTS|Fy|fantasy}} / fiction
</li></ol>

[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]]

Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q5601 - Revision history

Reversedragon: Making a choice is the opposite of predetermination

Reversedragon: copy markup from Q660