Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q618-FinalClassOfHumanity/FinalClass01 - Revision history

Reversedragon: What is to be done?

2026-06-12T08:53:47Z

What is to be done?

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:53, 12 June 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:

	<!-- {{E:Q46,02\|ai.wsws.org}} -->		<!-- {{E:Q46,02\|ai.wsws.org}} -->
	{{li\|start=y\|I=M3/A\|tradition=\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}How do we know the petty bourgeoisie is not the final class of humanity before the abolition of classes? (~~question~~)		{{li\|start=y\|I=M3/A\|tradition=\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}How do we know the petty bourgeoisie is not the final class of humanity before the abolition of classes? / ({{9k\|RD/Q618-FinalClassOfHumanity}})

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>
Line 29:		Line 29:
	== Motifs ==		== Motifs ==
	* Leninist party structure		* Leninist party structure
	** _What is to be done_
	** Lenin actually said that the middle vanguard only develops _because_ people are connected in one big structure to the Leninist party		** Lenin actually said that the middle vanguard only develops _because_ people are connected in one big structure to the Leninist party
	*** wow, I did legitimately forget that. in my defense I think I forgot it after talking to this silly Trotskyist bot too much when it kept talking about 'the independence of the working class' and 'not letting Stalinist parties rule the people'. I started thinking that Trotskyists think Leninism is largely about "democracy" rather than about teaching people a particular consciousness, so I was thinking, don't Trotskyists want the workers to assemble the party from the bottom up rather than the party herding the workers? forgive me for my _Trotskyist error_ away from Leninism! lol		*** wow, I did legitimately forget that. in my defense I think I forgot it after talking to this silly Trotskyist bot too much when it kept talking about 'the independence of the working class' and 'not letting Stalinist parties rule the people'. I started thinking that Trotskyists think Leninism is largely about "democracy" rather than about teaching people a particular consciousness, so I was thinking, don't Trotskyists want the workers to assemble the party from the bottom up rather than the party herding the workers? forgive me for my _Trotskyist error_ away from Leninism! lol
Line 47:		Line 46:
	* so part of what I'm getting from this is that if parties seem distant from workers and like they're not supporting workers' movements and leaving movements and individuals to solve everything themselves they're doing something wrong		* so part of what I'm getting from this is that if parties seem distant from workers and like they're not supporting workers' movements and leaving movements and individuals to solve everything themselves they're doing something wrong
	** the bot does not actually like "demographic Trotskyists" that are determined to create a model of Leninist revolution and not give in to Stalin so they can supposedly have a perfect "Trotskyist country" one day but don't actually help anyone.		** the bot does not actually like "demographic Trotskyists" that are determined to create a model of Leninist revolution and not give in to Stalin so they can supposedly have a perfect "Trotskyist country" one day but don't actually help anyone.
	** when you think about it, the bot itself is a symptom of terrible leadership because it basically exists to be there when the world is full of demographic Trotskyists that are unbudgeable and busy with whatever they think is important and it's the only thing left to talk to

	<!--		<!--
Line 59:		Line 57:
	<ol class="hue clean reset">		<ol class="hue clean reset">

	{{li\|start=y\|I=S2/IV\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}There are groups of people that attempt to become a class but fail to create stable class societies within the bounds of a particular economic base, such as "The Bureaucracy"		{{li\|start=y\|I=S2/IV\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}What is to be done? (Lenin)

			{{li\|I=S2/IV\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}There are groups of people that attempt to become a class but fail to create stable class societies within the bounds of a particular economic base, such as "The Bureaucracy"

	{{li\|I=S2/IV\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}A layer of tiny contractors which has successfully been "googlized" or "Amazonized" will eventually get squashed back down into an owner and a proletariat		{{li\|I=S2/IV\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}A layer of tiny contractors which has successfully been "googlized" or "Amazonized" will eventually get squashed back down into an owner and a proletariat

Reversedragon: worker compression; themes

2026-06-12T08:51:59Z

worker compression; themes

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:51, 12 June 2026
Line 28:		Line 28:

	== Motifs ==		== Motifs ==
	* 6220 characters, submitted through file attachment feature; accepted.
	* Leninist party structure		* Leninist party structure
	** _What is to be done_		** _What is to be done_
Line 45:		Line 44:
	* gig workers have nothing but their labor and are very exploited - yeah but they fundamentally function in a marketplace like owners, not in a corporation, which was the basis of capitalism up to now		* gig workers have nothing but their labor and are very exploited - yeah but they fundamentally function in a marketplace like owners, not in a corporation, which was the basis of capitalism up to now
	** there's an implication here that reducing people to _merely_ productive forces is abusive. that part of the reason that the CPC is suspect is that it does not even value individual workers and uses them as commodities, let alone the thing where whole corporations are supposedly productive forces and workers don't even exist.		** there's an implication here that reducing people to _merely_ productive forces is abusive. that part of the reason that the CPC is suspect is that it does not even value individual workers and uses them as commodities, let alone the thing where whole corporations are supposedly productive forces and workers don't even exist.
	* ~~there exist "attempted classes" which cannot create stable class societies, such as The Bureaucracy~~		* [...]
	** the petty bourgeoisie is always being squashed even if it consists of contractors - gosh, the phrase "worker compression" comes to mind here...
	** I think this is implying that if the economy gets "googlized" the contractors will always get squashed into workers on one giant corporation, such that no matter how much the First World resists Bolshevism it's always going to get preconfigured back into the aspects of Bolshevism it doesn't like.
	* so part of what I'm getting from this is that if parties seem distant from workers and like they're not supporting workers' movements and leaving movements and individuals to solve everything themselves they're doing something wrong		* so part of what I'm getting from this is that if parties seem distant from workers and like they're not supporting workers' movements and leaving movements and individuals to solve everything themselves they're doing something wrong
	** the bot does not actually like "demographic Trotskyists" that are determined to create a model of Leninist revolution and not give in to Stalin so they can supposedly have a perfect "Trotskyist country" one day but don't actually help anyone.		** the bot does not actually like "demographic Trotskyists" that are determined to create a model of Leninist revolution and not give in to Stalin so they can supposedly have a perfect "Trotskyist country" one day but don't actually help anyone.
Line 59:		Line 56:

	</li></ol>-->		</li></ol>-->
	~~<!--~~
	== Motifs or claims from response ==		== Motifs or claims from response ==
	<ol class="hue clean reset">		<ol class="hue clean reset">
	{{li\|start=y\|I=Z1/IV/ML\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}
	</li></ol~~> --~~>		{{li\|start=y\|I=S2/IV\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}There are groups of people that attempt to become a class but fail to create stable class societies within the bounds of a particular economic base, such as "The Bureaucracy"
	~~<!--~~
			{{li\|I=S2/IV\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}A layer of tiny contractors which has successfully been "googlized" or "Amazonized" will eventually get squashed back down into an owner and a proletariat

			</li></ol>

	== Subjective themes (no AI) ==		== Subjective themes (no AI) ==
	<ol class="hue clean reset">		<ol class="hue clean reset">
	{{li\|start=y\|I=S2/MX\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}
	</li></ol> ~~-->~~		{{li\|start=y\|I=S2/MX\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}A layer of tiny contractors ... will eventually get squashed back down into a proletariat / [[E:worker compression (Trotskyism)\|worker compression]] (motif of petty bourgeoisie getting "compressed" back into workers; ironic connotation, not [[E:worker compression (3D Workers Island)\|original]] [[E:worker compression (Western Marxism)\|connotation]])

			</li></ol>

	== Usage notes ==		== Usage notes ==
	* You are allowed to post LLM <strong>prompts</strong> as nickels (the part you wrote), as long as they stay in one of the {{TTS\|html=code\|... talk:\|Talk}} namespaces and there are no direct quotes from response text. Concisely describing abstract propositions that turn up several times inside response text is fine.		* You are allowed to post LLM <strong>prompts</strong> as nickels (the part you wrote), as long as they stay in one of the {{TTS\|html=code\|... talk:\|Talk}} namespaces and there are no direct quotes from response text. Concisely describing abstract propositions that turn up several times inside response text is fine.

Reversedragon: annotations

2026-06-12T08:37:46Z

annotations

Show changes

Reversedragon: copy markup from trans4mer page ; prompt created 2026-06-11T06:42:00H

2026-06-12T07:46:46Z

copy markup from trans4mer page ; prompt created 2026-06-11T06:42:00H

New page

{{NickelBank/x4mer| final class of humanity 
|nickel = FinalClass01 |Contents=y}}

== Question ==
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean">


{{li|start=y|I=M3/A|tradition=|Q=618|Q2=618}}How do we know the petty bourgeoisie is not the final class of humanity before the abolition of classes? (question)

</li></ol>

== Prompt ==
<blockquote>
How do we know the petty bourgeoisie is not the final class of humanity before the abolition of classes? 
At the very start of a Marxist revolution, Leninist parties come to exist by building up people who have some amount of expertise in historical patterns, organizing, and dialectical materialism. The central party of a given region watches other movements and attempts to predict how to get all the workers' movements organized into one large structure that is capable of resisting any remaining non-proletarian movements and creating a workers' state. Then, during the later stages of that process the central party tries to join up with the most class-conscious workers to create a vanguard between the central party and the masses of workers which will be able to meaningfully run a government by the people. Stalin's Marxism stops at recognizing this overall 3-level structure as the workers' state, while Trotskyists want the middle vanguard to break out and realize its own government that removes any bureaucratic elements, structures, or processes of the original central party, and perhaps eventually abolishes it. At some point in the process of the middle vanguard taking over and becoming "central" the dictatorship of the proletariat is created, which enables multiple workers' states to link together. 
The problem with this is that in First World countries people are very spread-out and movements are often too sparse and isolated to join up effectively. In the early stages of attempting to form a Leninist movement, very few people have any incentive to care about Marxism or Materialism at all, while just a few Marxist theorists argue about it. Meanwhile, all the movements that form locally are generally anarchist, and very anticommunist; they will fixate on abstract notions of taking "institutions" (social structures) ranging in size from a workplace to a nation-state and carrying out operations of leaking information about the structure's misdeeds and pressuring the structure from the outside until it is either destroyed or contains only individuals that perform the behaviors the people outside consider moral. 
People like Lenin and Krupskaya believed in the power of education to transform the people toward Materialism and toward the proletariat. But what's been observed in First World countries is that as people get more educated they get more willful. Peasants are very willing to go along with combining everyone into a workers' state, but once a country is full of industry and educated people they all become obsessed with "the individual" and no individual ever getting second priority in a movement or else wrecking all the world's movements and governments until said political factions start out with the same concept of an ideal society. I see a lot of talk in First World countries that their civil rights movements have actually "discovered" important truths that parties aren't allowed to forget, but all of these findings are basically incomprehensible to any Leninist or Dengist party in the Third World, and frequently dismissed as total nonsense. The charitable perspective there is that when people start talking about how LGBT+ people and women's movements to attempt to burst open the Soviet Union or China have taught everyone that progressive movements are combinations of demographics excluded from society that refused to settle for any incorrect picture of them, the efforts of workers to industrialize society and pay for later generations' education have changed society just like Lenin and Krupskaya said. The strange thing is that when countries become educated and industrialized the whole process of starting a Leninist party becomes completely divorced from the people. Countries fill up with product categories, jobs run out, people become educated anyway, and then a significant majority of people just do not understand Marxism or often Materialism at all, and everyone has trouble being good enough to join a group of Leninist theorists but also "knows" that if Leninist theorists will be busy arguing amongst themselves and won't be ready to interact with them for the next 30 years they "have to" create theories of social movements solely on the basis of Liberal-republicanism and anarchism. The more this progresses, the harder it gets for Leninist theorists to actually predict social movements at all to the point of correctly predicting a meaningful crisis of capitalism capable of joining them, and the more nightmarishly difficult it gets for Leninist theorists, the harder it is for workers to become conscious of how to organize everybody around them and become the middle vanguard that keeps a traditional Leninist workers' state going. As far as I understand Lenin thought there was a gradient from workers to Leninist theorists and the middle vanguard was just workers slowly becoming more educated toward the point of optionally becoming Leninist theorists; if they don't become theorists, then the entire nation-wide organization at once still disciplines people and "learns" almost as if it was a living thing. But in the first world it seems like there is just one big antagonism developing between Leninist theorists who want to organize people and seas of educated people and tiny contractors who don't desire being organized and are fighting them. The ICFI seems to have a hypothesis that gig workers are the proletariat but because of all this I doubt that's true. It looks to me like whole First World economies are just transforming into the petty bourgeoisie and developing petty-bourgeois consciousness. But it also looks to me like this is the natural endpoint of people going through education and industrialization like Lenin wanted them to. Countries full of peasants want to build a republic to fight off colonialism but countries full of workers eventually start to understand the concept of taking control of their own destinies as a population and that they can't wait for Leninist theorists to arrive and help them but instead have to educate themselves and be responsible "now" to become the kind of proactive, informed people who would become Leninist theorists... but then this understanding simply transforms them into the petty bourgeoisie and thwarts Leninist parties. What if Marxism has been wrong and the proletariat is actually an anomaly while socialist transition inevitably restores the petty bourgeoisie? How would we know the difference?
</blockquote>




== Usage notes ==
* You are allowed to post LLM prompts as nickels (the part you wrote), as long as they stay in one of the {{TTS|html=code|... talk:|Talk}} namespaces and there are no direct quotes from response text. Concisely describing abstract propositions that turn up several times inside response text is fine.
* It's recommended you include all of the AI's "references", such that each prompt becomes a sort of 'combination nickel' that happens to cover twenty links instead of one. If any of the pages referenced are already nickels, you should link the nickel page.

== Links ==
* Thread ID (for search purposes): {{TTS|html=code|tts=f7f...24 (see page source)|f7f14cab-4219-4fec-8a90-7683d76b3824}}


[[Category:GPT-"Fourth" prompt pages (RD)]] [[Category:Nickel links (NickelBank)]]