Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q642 - Revision history

Reversedragon: re-sort

2026-08-05T02:40:35Z

re-sort

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:40, 5 August 2026
Line 11:		Line 11:
	<ol class="hue clean field_ML field_horror">		<ol class="hue clean field_ML field_horror">

	{{li\|start=y\|I=S2/MX\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}It is ~~an Undesired outcome for people~~ to ~~believe codes of morality that are Materially Inaccurate; if people believe a code of morality~~ and ~~believing that code of morality causes observed outcomes established as Undesired outcomes, then that code of morality~~ is ~~Materially Inaccurate and people continuing to believe it~~ is ~~Undesired~~		{{li\|start=y\|I=S1/HAS\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}double consequentialism / An action that is morally right (Desired) is the one predicted to be objectively right, and the action which is objectively right is the action which actually has the best consequences [https://iep.utm.edu/consequentialism-utilitarianism/]

	{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Trotsky and Stalin reasonably expect different outcomes from the same policies / Expectable consequentialism is Idealism; any claim that somebody's actions are to be judged based on what ~~a person~~ can "reasonably expect" will be colored by individual people's specific chosen ideology and set of biases, and allow people to get out of any accusation by claiming that ~~it wasn~~'t what they reasonably expected / Expectable consequentialism is just a reinvention of deontology from a different angle (sense)		{{li\|I=S1/HAS\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}rule consequentialism / An action is morally right if it corresponds to the overall set of behaviors of a population that would result in the best outcomes [https://iep.utm.edu/consequentialism-utilitarianism/] -> oh god, it's the only version of consequentialism that actually makes sense. but it really highlights how the creation of ethics almost inherently results in the creation of government. this would probably be why deontology hasn't entirely died. people's desire to create government versus aversion to creating government is a big part of it.

			{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}It is an Undesired outcome for people to believe codes of morality that are Materially Inaccurate; if people believe a code of morality and believing that code of morality causes observed outcomes established as Undesired outcomes, then that code of morality is Materially Inaccurate and people continuing to believe it is Undesired

			{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Trotsky and Stalin "reasonably expect" different outcomes from the same policies / Expectable consequentialism is Idealism; any claim that somebody's actions are to be judged based on what each moral actor can "reasonably expect" will be colored by individual people's specific chosen ideology and set of biases, and allow people to get out of any accusation by claiming that various outcomes or behaviors of other people weren't what they reasonably expected / Expectable consequentialism is just a reinvention of deontology from a different angle (sense)

	{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}A reasonable anarchist can break down your door for any choice / Reasonable consequentialism is ideological chauvinism; any attempt to get out of the problems of expectable consequentialism by attempting to say that models of reality must be "reasonable" opens the floodgates for any possible definition of "reasonable" to declare itself the only correct definition in the world and call all actors who do not use that definition unreasonable and prone to making the wrong decisions		{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}A reasonable anarchist can break down your door for any choice / Reasonable consequentialism is ideological chauvinism; any attempt to get out of the problems of expectable consequentialism by attempting to say that models of reality must be "reasonable" opens the floodgates for any possible definition of "reasonable" to declare itself the only correct definition in the world and call all actors who do not use that definition unreasonable and prone to making the wrong decisions
Line 59:		Line 63:

	== Related ==		== Related ==
			<!--
	<ol class="hue clean field_ML">		<ol class="hue clean field_ML">
			</li></ol> -->
	{{li\|start=y\|I=S1/HAS\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}rule consequentialism / An action is morally right if it corresponds to the overall set of behaviors of a population that would result in the best outcomes [https://iep.utm.edu/consequentialism-utilitarianism/] -> oh god, it's the only version of consequentialism that actually makes sense. but it really highlights how the creation of ethics almost inherently results in the creation of government. this would probably be why deontology hasn't entirely died. people's desire to create government versus aversion to creating government is a big part of it.

	{{li\|I=S1/HAS\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}double consequentialism / An action that is morally right (Desired) is the one predicted to be objectively right; the action which is objectively right is the action which actually has the best consequences [https://iep.utm.edu/consequentialism-utilitarianism/]

	</li></ol>
	<!--		<!--
	== Wavebuilder combinations ==		== Wavebuilder combinations ==

Reversedragon: Stalin was the worst

2026-08-05T02:27:55Z

Stalin was the worst

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:27, 5 August 2026
Line 31:		Line 31:

	{{li\|I=S2/DX\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Cuban exiles are currently chipping away at Cuba's government to try to get compensated for sugarcane plantations -> this really shows how imperial every single seemingly innocuous act of buying and selling something is, I mean, the arrogance to think somebody will just pay you to prove they have {{em\|the elite expertise}} to take back what might have been a site of slavery. has agorism ever been anything but inherent hierarchy over the rest of the world the instant lines are drawn around a single person or drawn around anything?		{{li\|I=S2/DX\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Cuban exiles are currently chipping away at Cuba's government to try to get compensated for sugarcane plantations -> this really shows how imperial every single seemingly innocuous act of buying and selling something is, I mean, the arrogance to think somebody will just pay you to prove they have {{em\|the elite expertise}} to take back what might have been a site of slavery. has agorism ever been anything but inherent hierarchy over the rest of the world the instant lines are drawn around a single person or drawn around anything?

			{{li\|I=F2/IV\|Q=618\|Q2=618\|h4= Stalin was the worst }} / The Moscow Trials exposed Stalin as the dirtiest, most criminal and most repulsive figure in history (Trotsky) [https://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1939/03/krupskaya.htm] -> despite this being a subjective statement predicated on how much people know about different parts of the world and different historical periods I think it's actually pretty easy to say this is false. because frankly, Alexander Dugin declaring war on Ukraine is a lot worse than anything Stalin ever did. he's [[E:Identitarian fascism\|a nazi]]. that's a lebensraum mission. whatever Stalin did it was to protect the people of the Soviet Union from outside attack and keep any of the republics from turning into nazism. in the United States it's been argued that fascism is one of the most obviously Wrong things in the world. so, doesn't it logically follow that Stalinism is then {{em\|not}} the most obviously Wrong thing in the world, if it can be showed that its purpose was to prevent the most obviously Wrong thing and its orientation was toward self-sacrifice and against colonial control of one country by another?

			{{li\|I=F2/IV\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Stalin was the absolute worst -> truth values: Improperly Boxed-In Statement, Ethically Inconsistent.

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>
Line 44:		Line 48:

	{{li\|I=S1/DFy\|Q=618\|Q2=618\|h4= Materially Inaccurate }} (truth value) / False (physics, natural sciences; truth value) -> this describes statements that are not true with regard to the real world in general. because of the difficult problem of rare events, there may be many auxiliary truth values needed in between Materially Accurate and Materially Inaccurate to properly describe how accurate a statement is and when it applies, such as Some Occurrence, True In United States, or True In Capitalism.		{{li\|I=S1/DFy\|Q=618\|Q2=618\|h4= Materially Inaccurate }} (truth value) / False (physics, natural sciences; truth value) -> this describes statements that are not true with regard to the real world in general. because of the difficult problem of rare events, there may be many auxiliary truth values needed in between Materially Accurate and Materially Inaccurate to properly describe how accurate a statement is and when it applies, such as Some Occurrence, True In United States, or True In Capitalism.

			{{li\|I=S1/Fy\|Q=618\|Q2=618\|h4= Ethically Consistent }} (truth value) -> this describes a statement which creates a logically consistent system of ethical rules. consistency doesn't guarantee that the ethical system is Materially Accurate, but does make it somewhat more likely.

			{{li\|I=S1/DFy\|Q=618\|Q2=618\|h4= Ethically Inconsistent }} (truth value)

			{{li\|I=S1/ML\|Q=618\|Q2=618\|h4= Improperly Boxed-In Statement }} (truth value) -> this describes statements that seem to be True based on a limited amount of information, but are shown to in some way end up with some kind of Falsy truth value once more information is added.<br/>
			one of the most uniquely Stalinist truth values there is, despite the same error often being made by Trotskyists.

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

Reversedragon: field: ethical theory

2026-06-27T11:27:46Z

field: ethical theory

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:27, 27 June 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean field_ML">		{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean field_ML">

	{{li\|start=y\|I=S1/HAS\|Q=642\|Q2=642}}pinning False to anecdotes / pinning True to specific incident / pinning True to oddly-specific outcome / pegging truth values to oddly specific outcomes -><br/>		{{li\|start=y\|I=S1/HAS\|Q=642\|Q2=642\|h4= pinning False to anecdotes }} / pinning True to specific incident / pinning True to oddly-specific outcome / pegging truth values to oddly specific outcomes -><br/>
	I have problems with critical-theory doing this because of how specific it gets without realizing how specific it got, but at the same time, it's an interesting concept if you look at it in its totality and think about all the possible ways you could do it. I independently reinvented it on my own with early Trotskyism before I even had any idea that critical-theory was doing it. then, after puppetting the concept of Liberal-republicanism ironically I finally realized that pointing to [[EC:9k/RD/Q618-CourtCase\|the need to resolve court cases]], or pointing to the need to get rid of "prejudice" was the same thing. each example has weaknesses in that other [[E:All political philosophies are ideologies\|sociophilosophies]] won't think it's important, but when you take a reasonably diverse array of examples together you see a clearer picture start to form of what all the examples are actually saying.		I have problems with critical-theory doing this because of how specific it gets without realizing how specific it got, but at the same time, it's an interesting concept if you look at it in its totality and think about all the possible ways you could do it. I independently reinvented it on my own with early Trotskyism before I even had any idea that critical-theory was doing it. then, after puppetting the concept of Liberal-republicanism ironically I finally realized that pointing to [[EC:9k/RD/Q618-CourtCase\|the need to resolve court cases]], or pointing to the need to get rid of "prejudice" was the same thing. each example has weaknesses in that other [[E:All political philosophies are ideologies\|sociophilosophies]] won't think it's important, but when you take a reasonably diverse array of examples together you see a clearer picture start to form of what all the examples are actually saying.

Line 70:		Line 70:
	{{li\|I=S1/DFy\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|STM\|Stem}} / Falsy values		{{li\|I=S1/DFy\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|STM\|Stem}} / Falsy values
	{{li\|I=S1/LR \|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|LR\|L-R}} / Liberal-republicanism		{{li\|I=S1/LR \|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|LR\|L-R}} / Liberal-republicanism
			{{li\|I=S1/ES \|Q=669\|Q2=669}}{{TTS\|ES\|E-S}} / [[EC:9k/RD/Q660\|ethical theory]]
	{{li\|I=S1/IK \|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|IK\|I.K.}} / Kantianism		{{li\|I=S1/IK \|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|IK\|I.K.}} / Kantianism
	{{li\|I=S1/HM \|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|HM\|H.M.}} / critical theory		{{li\|I=S1/HM \|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|HM\|H.M.}} / critical theory

Reversedragon: Trotsky and Stalin reasonably expect different outcomes from the same policies

2026-06-22T03:53:56Z

Trotsky and Stalin reasonably expect different outcomes from the same policies

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:53, 22 June 2026
Line 12:		Line 12:

	{{li\|start=y\|I=S2/MX\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}It is an Undesired outcome for people to believe codes of morality that are Materially Inaccurate; if people believe a code of morality and believing that code of morality causes observed outcomes established as Undesired outcomes, then that code of morality is Materially Inaccurate and people continuing to believe it is Undesired		{{li\|start=y\|I=S2/MX\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}It is an Undesired outcome for people to believe codes of morality that are Materially Inaccurate; if people believe a code of morality and believing that code of morality causes observed outcomes established as Undesired outcomes, then that code of morality is Materially Inaccurate and people continuing to believe it is Undesired

			{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Trotsky and Stalin reasonably expect different outcomes from the same policies / Expectable consequentialism is Idealism; any claim that somebody's actions are to be judged based on what a person can "reasonably expect" will be colored by individual people's specific chosen ideology and set of biases, and allow people to get out of any accusation by claiming that it wasn't what they reasonably expected / Expectable consequentialism is just a reinvention of deontology from a different angle (sense)

			{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}A reasonable anarchist can break down your door for any choice / Reasonable consequentialism is ideological chauvinism; any attempt to get out of the problems of expectable consequentialism by attempting to say that models of reality must be "reasonable" opens the floodgates for any possible definition of "reasonable" to declare itself the only correct definition in the world and call all actors who do not use that definition unreasonable and prone to making the wrong decisions

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>
Line 44:		Line 48:

	== Related ==		== Related ==
	~~<!--~~
	<ol class="hue clean field_ML">		<ol class="hue clean field_ML">

			{{li\|start=y\|I=S1/HAS\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}rule consequentialism / An action is morally right if it corresponds to the overall set of behaviors of a population that would result in the best outcomes [https://iep.utm.edu/consequentialism-utilitarianism/] -> oh god, it's the only version of consequentialism that actually makes sense. but it really highlights how the creation of ethics almost inherently results in the creation of government. this would probably be why deontology hasn't entirely died. people's desire to create government versus aversion to creating government is a big part of it.

			{{li\|I=S1/HAS\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}double consequentialism / An action that is morally right (Desired) is the one predicted to be objectively right; the action which is objectively right is the action which actually has the best consequences [https://iep.utm.edu/consequentialism-utilitarianism/]

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>
	~~-->~~

	<!--		<!--
	== Wavebuilder combinations ==		== Wavebuilder combinations ==

Reversedragon: Corporations spontaneously converting property is an Undesired outcome

2026-06-21T11:40:38Z

Corporations spontaneously converting property is an Undesired outcome

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:40, 21 June 2026
Line 4:		Line 4:

	{{li\|start=y\|I=S1/HAS\|Q=642\|Q2=642}}pinning False to anecdotes / pinning True to specific incident / pinning True to oddly-specific outcome / pegging truth values to oddly specific outcomes -><br/>		{{li\|start=y\|I=S1/HAS\|Q=642\|Q2=642}}pinning False to anecdotes / pinning True to specific incident / pinning True to oddly-specific outcome / pegging truth values to oddly specific outcomes -><br/>
	I have problems with critical-theory doing this because of how specific it gets without realizing how specific it got, but at the same time, it's an interesting concept if you look at it in its totality and think about all the possible ways you could do it. I independently ~~invented~~ it on my own with early Trotskyism before I even had any idea that critical-theory was doing it. then, after puppetting the concept of Liberal-republicanism ironically I finally realized that pointing to [[EC:9k/RD/Q618-CourtCase\|the need to resolve court cases]], or pointing to the need to get rid of "prejudice" was the same thing. each example has weaknesses in that other [[E:All political philosophies are ideologies\|sociophilosophies]] won't think it's important, but when you take a reasonably diverse array of examples together you see a clearer picture start to form of what all the examples are actually saying.		I have problems with critical-theory doing this because of how specific it gets without realizing how specific it got, but at the same time, it's an interesting concept if you look at it in its totality and think about all the possible ways you could do it. I independently reinvented it on my own with early Trotskyism before I even had any idea that critical-theory was doing it. then, after puppetting the concept of Liberal-republicanism ironically I finally realized that pointing to [[EC:9k/RD/Q618-CourtCase\|the need to resolve court cases]], or pointing to the need to get rid of "prejudice" was the same thing. each example has weaknesses in that other [[E:All political philosophies are ideologies\|sociophilosophies]] won't think it's important, but when you take a reasonably diverse array of examples together you see a clearer picture start to form of what all the examples are actually saying.

			</li></ol>

			== Boring setup rules ==
			<ol class="hue clean field_ML field_horror">

			{{li\|start=y\|I=S2/MX\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}It is an Undesired outcome for people to believe codes of morality that are Materially Inaccurate; if people believe a code of morality and believing that code of morality causes observed outcomes established as Undesired outcomes, then that code of morality is Materially Inaccurate and people continuing to believe it is Undesired

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>
Line 11:		Line 18:
	<ol class="hue clean field_ML field_horror">		<ol class="hue clean field_ML field_horror">

	{{li\|start=y\|I=S1/Fy\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}~~Desired~~ (truth value) / desirable outcome (truth value)		{{li\|start=y\|I=S2/LR\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Corporations spontaneously converting property is an Undesired outcome / A society in which the brand owner of a franchise store can confiscate a pile of products that does not belong to them approximately equaling the value of a Lamborghini SUV, and not expect any legal consequences for spontaneously drawing new lines of legal protection around significant amounts of property, is an Undesired outcome
	{{li\|I=S1/DFy\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}~~Undesired~~ (truth value) / undesirable outcome (truth value)
			{{li\|I=S2/IV/LR\|tradition=MX onto LR onto IV, MX/IV/LR\|Q=29,84\|Q2=2984\|h4 = Oppressing early Trotskyism is Undesired }} / In the First World Trotsky is sacred / ([[User:RD/9k/Q29,84\|9k/Q29,84]], [[EC:9k/RD/Q41,91\|Q41,91]]) -> widely repeated by Liberal-republicanism, but also approved by Trotskyists; something of a classic.

			{{li\|I=S2/ML\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Restoring capitalism in the Soviet Union is Undesired -> nobody wanted this. the only people who wanted this were outright supporters of the United States empire.

			{{li\|I=S2/DX\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Allowing foreigners to create businesses in Cuba out of African slaves is Undesired (1880-1930) [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_Cuba]

			{{li\|I=S2/DX\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Cuban exiles are currently chipping away at Cuba's government to try to get compensated for sugarcane plantations -> this really shows how imperial every single seemingly innocuous act of buying and selling something is, I mean, the arrogance to think somebody will just pay you to prove they have {{em\|the elite expertise}} to take back what might have been a site of slavery. has agorism ever been anything but inherent hierarchy over the rest of the world the instant lines are drawn around a single person or drawn around anything?

			</li></ol>

			== Truth values ==
			<ol class="hue clean field_ML field_horror">

			{{li\|start=y\|I=S1/Fy\|Q=618\|Q2=618\|h4= Desired }} (truth value) / desirable outcome (truth value) / good consequence [https://iep.utm.edu/consequentialism-utilitarianism/] -> a desirable outcome is an outcome which might be written into law as the correct answer, written into a party program, assumed to be the outcome a Materialist model of reality is intending to unravel the steps to, or simply accepted when it happens. Desired does not inherently correlate with "Good"/"Right", although given the typical purpose of morality they will often happen to align. marking an outcome Desired is not a guarantee that determination was objective, but an objective determination is more likely to be reached if two factions come to a consensus on something as Desired and a third faction rival to the consensus evaluates the consensus from a skeptical position before ending up at the conclusion of Desired.

			{{li\|I=S1/DFy\|Q=618\|Q2=618\|h4= Undesired }} (truth value) / undesirable outcome (truth value) / bad consequence [https://iep.utm.edu/consequentialism-utilitarianism/] -> an undesirable outcome is an outcome which is identified as a problem to society for some specific reason. Undesired does not inherently correlate with "Bad"/"Wrong", often because a lot of outcomes marked Undesired within any number of ideologies are reached by something more resembling inanimate processes than moral agents. this in turn leads to arguments that even processes which were not anyone's choice need to be managed by giving people new responsibility.

			{{li\|I=S1/STM/Fy\|Q=618\|Q2=618\|h4= Materially Accurate }} (truth value) / True (physics, natural sciences; truth value) -> one of the most generic truth values. this describes statements that are true with regard to the real world in general and with regard to material reality but not taking into account subjective forms of truth that are described by other sets of truth values, such as Technically Impressive (arts) or Character Is Furry (furry fandom).

	{{li\|I=S2/~~MX/LR\|tradition=MX onto LR onto IV, MX/IV/LR~~\|Q=~~29,84~~\|Q2=~~2984~~\|h4 = ~~Oppressing early Trotskyism is Undesired~~ }} / ~~In the First World Trotsky is sacred /~~ (~~[[User:RD/9k/Q29~~,~~84\|9k/Q29,84]], [[EC:9k/RD/Q41,91\|Q41,91]]~~) -> ~~widely repeated by Liberal-republicanism~~, ~~but also approved by Trotskyists; something of~~ a ~~classic~~.		{{li\|I=S1/DFy\|Q=618\|Q2=618\|h4= Materially Inaccurate }} (truth value) / False (physics, natural sciences; truth value) -> this describes statements that are not true with regard to the real world in general. because of the difficult problem of rare events, there may be many auxiliary truth values needed in between Materially Accurate and Materially Inaccurate to properly describe how accurate a statement is and when it applies, such as Some Occurrence, True In United States, or True In Capitalism.

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>
Line 31:		Line 56:
	-->		-->
	== Ideologies or fields ==		== Ideologies or fields ==
	<ol class="hue clean terse field_exstruct">		<ol class="hue clean terse field_ML field_horror"><!-- inactive: field_exstruct -->
	{{li\|start=y		{{li\|start=y
	\|I=S1/MX\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|MX\|meta-}} / non-binary logic		\|I=S1/HAS\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|HAS\|Hass}} / formal logic
	{{li\|I=S1/HM\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|HM\|H.M.}} / critical theory		{{li\|I=S1/MX \|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|MX\|meta-}} / non-binary logic
			{{li\|I=S1/STM\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|STM\|Stem}} / [[EC:9k/RD/Q530\|truth values]]
			{{li\|I=S1/Fy \|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|STM\|Stem}} / Truthy values
			{{li\|I=S1/DFy\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|STM\|Stem}} / Falsy values
			{{li\|I=S1/LR \|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|LR\|L-R}} / Liberal-republicanism
			{{li\|I=S1/IK \|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|IK\|I.K.}} / Kantianism
			{{li\|I=S1/HM \|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|HM\|H.M.}} / critical theory
	</li></ol>		</li></ol>
	<!--		<!--

Reversedragon: pinning False to anecdotes ; created today

2026-06-21T09:58:30Z

pinning False to anecdotes ; created today

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:58, 21 June 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{NextNineThousand\|PPPA=pinning False to anecdotes\|User=RD\|E=Q642\|Contents=y}}		{{NextNineThousand\|PPPA=pinning False to anecdotes\|User=RD\|E=Q642\|Contents=y}}
	== Main entry ==		== Main entry ==
	{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean ~~field_exstruct~~">		{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean field_ML">
	~~<!-- {{li\|start=y\|I=Z1/DFy\|Q=65,09\|Q2=6509}} --~~>

	<li ~~class~~=~~"field_exstruct" value~~="642~~" data-dimension~~=~~"S">~~pinning False to anecdotes / pinning True to specific incident / pinning True to oddly-specific outcome / pegging truth values to oddly specific outcomes		{{li\|start=y\|I=S1/HAS\|Q=642\|Q2=642}}pinning False to anecdotes / pinning True to specific incident / pinning True to oddly-specific outcome / pegging truth values to oddly specific outcomes -><br/>
			I have problems with critical-theory doing this because of how specific it gets without realizing how specific it got, but at the same time, it's an interesting concept if you look at it in its totality and think about all the possible ways you could do it. I independently invented it on my own with early Trotskyism before I even had any idea that critical-theory was doing it. then, after puppetting the concept of Liberal-republicanism ironically I finally realized that pointing to [[EC:9k/RD/Q618-CourtCase\|the need to resolve court cases]], or pointing to the need to get rid of "prejudice" was the same thing. each example has weaknesses in that other [[E:All political philosophies are ideologies\|sociophilosophies]] won't think it's important, but when you take a reasonably diverse array of examples together you see a clearer picture start to form of what all the examples are actually saying.

			</li></ol>

			== Scenarios ==
			<ol class="hue clean field_ML field_horror">

			{{li\|start=y\|I=S1/Fy\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Desired (truth value) / desirable outcome (truth value)
			{{li\|I=S1/DFy\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}Undesired (truth value) / undesirable outcome (truth value)

			{{li\|I=S2/MX/LR\|tradition=MX onto LR onto IV, MX/IV/LR\|Q=29,84\|Q2=2984\|h4 = Oppressing early Trotskyism is Undesired }} / In the First World Trotsky is sacred / ([[User:RD/9k/Q29,84\|9k/Q29,84]], [[EC:9k/RD/Q41,91\|Q41,91]]) -> widely repeated by Liberal-republicanism, but also approved by Trotskyists; something of a classic.

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>
Line 10:		Line 20:
	== Related ==		== Related ==
	<!--		<!--
	<ol class="hue clean ~~field_exstruct field_horror~~">		<ol class="hue clean field_ML">
	</li></ol> -->		</li></ol>
			-->

	<!--		<!--

Reversedragon: copy markup from Q618-DigitalCircus

2026-06-21T09:36:03Z

copy markup from Q618-DigitalCircus

New page

{{NextNineThousand|PPPA=pinning False to anecdotes|User=RD|E=Q642|Contents=y}}
== Main entry ==
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean field_exstruct">


<li class="field_exstruct" value="642" data-dimension="S">pinning False to anecdotes / pinning True to specific incident / pinning True to oddly-specific outcome / pegging truth values to oddly specific outcomes

</li></ol>

== Related ==



== Ideologies or fields ==
<ol class="hue clean terse field_exstruct">
{{li|start=y
|I=S1/MX|Q=618|Q2=618}}{{TTS|MX|meta-}} / non-binary logic
{{li|I=S1/HM|Q=618|Q2=618}}{{TTS|HM|H.M.}} / critical theory
</li></ol>

[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:27, 27 June 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean field_ML">		{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean field_ML">

	{{li\|start=y\|I=S1/HAS\|Q=642\|Q2=642}}pinning False to anecdotes / pinning True to specific incident / pinning True to oddly-specific outcome / pegging truth values to oddly specific outcomes -><br/>		{{li\|start=y\|I=S1/HAS\|Q=642\|Q2=642\|h4= pinning False to anecdotes }} / pinning True to specific incident / pinning True to oddly-specific outcome / pegging truth values to oddly specific outcomes -><br/>
	I have problems with critical-theory doing this because of how specific it gets without realizing how specific it got, but at the same time, it's an interesting concept if you look at it in its totality and think about all the possible ways you could do it. I independently reinvented it on my own with early Trotskyism before I even had any idea that critical-theory was doing it. then, after puppetting the concept of Liberal-republicanism ironically I finally realized that pointing to [[EC:9k/RD/Q618-CourtCase\|the need to resolve court cases]], or pointing to the need to get rid of "prejudice" was the same thing. each example has weaknesses in that other [[E:All political philosophies are ideologies\|sociophilosophies]] won't think it's important, but when you take a reasonably diverse array of examples together you see a clearer picture start to form of what all the examples are actually saying.		I have problems with critical-theory doing this because of how specific it gets without realizing how specific it got, but at the same time, it's an interesting concept if you look at it in its totality and think about all the possible ways you could do it. I independently reinvented it on my own with early Trotskyism before I even had any idea that critical-theory was doing it. then, after puppetting the concept of Liberal-republicanism ironically I finally realized that pointing to [[EC:9k/RD/Q618-CourtCase\|the need to resolve court cases]], or pointing to the need to get rid of "prejudice" was the same thing. each example has weaknesses in that other [[E:All political philosophies are ideologies\|sociophilosophies]] won't think it's important, but when you take a reasonably diverse array of examples together you see a clearer picture start to form of what all the examples are actually saying.

Line 70:		Line 70:
	{{li\|I=S1/DFy\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|STM\|Stem}} / Falsy values		{{li\|I=S1/DFy\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|STM\|Stem}} / Falsy values
	{{li\|I=S1/LR \|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|LR\|L-R}} / Liberal-republicanism		{{li\|I=S1/LR \|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|LR\|L-R}} / Liberal-republicanism
			{{li\|I=S1/ES \|Q=669\|Q2=669}}{{TTS\|ES\|E-S}} / [[EC:9k/RD/Q660\|ethical theory]]
	{{li\|I=S1/IK \|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|IK\|I.K.}} / Kantianism		{{li\|I=S1/IK \|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|IK\|I.K.}} / Kantianism
	{{li\|I=S1/HM \|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|HM\|H.M.}} / critical theory		{{li\|I=S1/HM \|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|HM\|H.M.}} / critical theory