Reversedragon: copy markup from Q28,93

2026-08-01T11:53:18Z

copy markup from Q28,93

New page

{{NextNineThousand|PPPA=but that's just Stalinism|User=RD|E=Q70,44|Contents=y}}
== Main entry ==
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean">

{{li|start=y|I=S1/MX/ML|Q=70,44|Q2=7044|h4= meta-Marxism? that's just Stalinism }} / meta-Marxism? but this is just Stalinism / your meta-Marxism is literally just Stalinism / {{TTS|lang=ja|菫マク？|きんマク？|title=きんマク？／すみれ色のマルクス主義？}}{{TTS|lang=ja|スターリニズムなんだが⋯}} -> I put some really harsh entries in this range, so... here I give Trotskyists one to balance it out. because a couple of times I really did do this, and now I feel a little silly. that {{em|isn't}} what meta-Marxism is, so I will be switching them to crimson.

{{li|I=S1/MX/IV|Q=70,43|Q2=7043|h4= meta-Marxism? that's just Trotskyism }} / meta-Marxism? but this is just Trotskyism / your meta-Marxism is literally just Trotskyists not believing claims from Stalin's Marxism -> for completeness.

</li></ol>

== Examples (Stalin's Marxism) ==
<ol class="hue clean">

{{li|I=S1/ML|tradition=ML onto IV|Q=28,93|Q2=2893}}the only correct thing Trotsky ever said / ({{9k|RD/Q28,93}}) -> {{i|a dumb joke I keep making in things which is funny because there is always more than one of these. but there's also the question of whether any of the "correct" things Trotsky said are correct in context, or if they all come with a subtext of being completely misapplied to the point that saying "the only correct thing Trotsky ever said" is funny again. that's just the thing, how long it takes to properly unpack a concept like this to the point there could be a whole page about it.}}<br/>
transparent Stalinism italicized

</li></ol>

== Examples (Trotskyism) ==


== Related ==


== Ideology codes ==

* MX / meta-Marxism
* ML / Stalin's Marxism
* IV / Trotskyism
* ML onto IV

[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]]

Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q7044 - Revision history

Reversedragon: copy markup from Q28,93