Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q73 - Revision history

Reversedragon: standpoint epistemology

2026-09-06T05:33:41Z

standpoint epistemology

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:33, 6 September 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{NextNineThousand\|PPPA=Existentialist-Structuralist tradition\|User=RD\|E=Q73\|Contents=y}}		{{NextNineThousand\|PPPA=Existentialist-Structuralist tradition\|User=RD\|E=Q73\|Contents=y}}
	== Main entry ==		== Main entry ==
	{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean">		{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean"><!-- inactive: field_exstruct -->

	<li ~~class~~=~~"field_exstruct" value~~="73~~" data-dimension~~=~~"Z">~~[[Ontology:Q73\|Existentialist-Structuralist tradition]] / Existentialism (abbreviation) -> note, early-existentialism is already Q42		{{li\|start=y\|I=S1/ES\|tradition=ES\|Q=73\|Q2=73}}[[Ontology:Q73\|Existentialist-Structuralist tradition]] / Existentialism (abbreviation) -> note, early-existentialism is already Q42

	</~~li><li class~~=~~"field_exstruct" value~~="73~~" data-dimension~~=~~"Z">~~Existentialist-Structuralist tradition / political agorism (?)		{{li\|I=S1/ES\|tradition=ES\|Q=73\|Q2=73}}Existentialist-Structuralist tradition (hypothesized philosophical tradition based on connected motifs) / political agorism (socio-economic model which appears most likely to have been generating Existentialist-Structuralist motif constellation)

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

	== Potential members ==		== Potential members ==
	<ol class="hue clean ~~field_exstruct~~">		<ol class="hue clean">

			{{li\|start=y\|I=S1/ES\|tradition=ES\|Q=42\|Q2=42}}existentialism / [[Ontology:Q42\|early existentialism]] / existence-philosophy / {{TTS\|lang=de\|Existenzphilosophie\|href=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existenzphilosophie}} / existentialist tradition

			{{li\|I=S1/ES\|tradition=\|Q=72\|Q2=72}}phenomenology / Husserl's phenomenology (Existentialism)

			{{li\|I=S1/ES\|tradition=ES\|Q=74\|Q2=74}}structuralist linguistics / structuralism (linguistics)

			{{li\|I=S1/ES\|tradition=\|Q=76\|Q2=76}}post-structuralist philosophy / post-structuralism (philosophy)

			{{li\|I=S1/Aa\|tradition=Aa\|Q=75\|Q2=75}}psychoanalysis / Freudian psychoanalysis (generic) / Lacanian psychoanalysis (generic)

			{{li\|I=S1/DG\|tradition=DG\|Q=77\|Q2=77}}schizoanalysis

	</~~li><li class~~=~~"field_exstruct" value~~=~~"72" data-dimension~~=~~"Z">phenomenology~~ / ~~Husserl~~'s ~~phenomenology (Existentialism~~)		{{li\|I=S1/ES\|tradition=ES, AC\|Q=78\|Q2=78}}alterity theories / postcolonial theories (theories about how colonialism is a prejudice about a group of people in someone's mind) / postcolonial anarchisms (generic)
	~~</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="74" data-dimension="Z">structuralist linguistics~~ / ~~structuralism~~ (~~linguistics~~)
	~~</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="75" data-dimension="Z">poststructuralism~~

	</li~~><li value="42" data-dimension~~=~~"Z" class="field_exstruct">existentialism~~ / ~~[[Ontology:Q42~~\|~~early existentialism]] / existence-philosophy / {{TTS~~\|~~lang~~=de\|~~Existenzphilosophie\|href~~=~~https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existenzphilosophie~~}} ~~/ existentialist tradition~~		{{li\|I=S1/ES\|tradition=\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}standpoint epistemology

	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_exstruct" value="76" data-dimension="Z">psychoanalysis / Freudian psychoanalysis (generic) / Lacanian psychoanalysis (generic)~~		{{li\|I=S1/ES\|tradition=\|Q=79\|Q2=79}}post-Marxism / ({{9k\|RD/Q79}})
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"field_exstruct" value~~=~~"77" data-dimension~~=~~"Z">schizoanalysis~~
	~~</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="78" data~~-~~dimension="S">alterity theories~~ / ~~postcolonial theories~~ (~~theories about how colonialism is a prejudice about a group of people in someone's mind~~)
	~~</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="79" data-dimension="Z">post-Marxism~~

	{{li\|I=S1/Ag\|tradition=Ag, ES\|Q=~~618~~}}agorism -> this is.... possibly the most cohesive bit of material logic connecting all the other things here without introducing an "outside" philosophy to explain them. I feel like in making this list or various other versions of it I have maybe actually been describing "political agorism"		{{li\|I=S1/ES\|tradition=\|Q=51,85\|Q2=5185}}postmodernism (philosophy)

			{{li\|I=S1/Ag\|tradition=Ag, ES\|Q=53,42\|Q2=5342}}agorism -> this is.... possibly the most cohesive bit of material logic connecting all the other things here without introducing an "outside" philosophy to explain them. I feel like in making this list or various other versions of it I have maybe actually been describing "political agorism"

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>
Line 40:		Line 49:

	{{li\|I=S1/ES\|tradition=ES, LR, Aa\|Q=33,11\|Q2=3311}}buried agorism / buried Existentialism -> generic motif for discovering some period of Existentialism inside fiction. as this might be found in nearly any piece of fiction, there should be some very clear piece of evidence given for the themes being very specific and potentially unfamiliar ideas particular to Existentialist philosophy, thus making the reader ask "what is this and what is it doing in here?". the mere presence of something like character growth or identity doesn't inherently count as Existentialism. a more specific proposition such as "a [[E:The Subject\|Subject]] can decide on their own identity without the constant and inevitable input of others" (then where does their development come from?) or "nobody can ever predict other individuals" (even when we all have mirror neurons?) might very well count.		{{li\|I=S1/ES\|tradition=ES, LR, Aa\|Q=33,11\|Q2=3311}}buried agorism / buried Existentialism -> generic motif for discovering some period of Existentialism inside fiction. as this might be found in nearly any piece of fiction, there should be some very clear piece of evidence given for the themes being very specific and potentially unfamiliar ideas particular to Existentialist philosophy, thus making the reader ask "what is this and what is it doing in here?". the mere presence of something like character growth or identity doesn't inherently count as Existentialism. a more specific proposition such as "a [[E:The Subject\|Subject]] can decide on their own identity without the constant and inevitable input of others" (then where does their development come from?) or "nobody can ever predict other individuals" (even when we all have mirror neurons?) might very well count.

	{{li\|I=S1/ES\|dimension=L\|Q=310\|Q2=310}}buried Existentialism -> (number from first prototype before Lexemes became Terms, and were then replaced with disambiguation pages)		{{li\|I=S1/ES\|dimension=L\|Q=310\|Q2=310}}buried Existentialism -> (number from first prototype before Lexemes became Terms, and were then replaced with disambiguation pages)

Line 47:		Line 57:
	<ol class="hue clean">		<ol class="hue clean">

	<li ~~class~~=~~"field_exstruct" data~~-~~remark="~~one basic precursor to E-S trad~~" value~~=~~"70" data-dimension="Z">analytic philosophy~~		{{li\|start=y\|I=Z1/ES\|tradition=\|Q=70\|Q2=70}}analytic philosophy -> one basic precursor to E-S trad
	</~~li><li class~~=~~"field_exstruct" value~~="71~~" data-dimension~~=~~"S0">~~field of study diagramming signs and signifiers / semiotics (generic) / structuralist linguistics (generic) / meta-ontology (generic)
			{{li\|I=S0/ES\|tradition=\|Q=71\|Q2=71}}field of study diagramming signs and signifiers / semiotics (generic) / structuralist linguistics (generic) / meta-ontology (generic)

	{{li\|I=S1/ES~~/ML~~\|Q=618}}the eclectic gruel of philosophy / the pauper's broth of eclecticism which is ladled out in the universities under the name of philosophy (Engels) [https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1886/ludwig-feuerbach/ch01.htm] -> there are some descriptions where you see them and you just know, I've seen this, this is ridiculously relatable across time periods. I haven't read these specific philosophies and yet just by that description I feel like I already have.		{{li\|I=S1/MN\|tradition=MN onto ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}the eclectic gruel of philosophy / the pauper's broth of eclecticism which is ladled out in the universities under the name of philosophy (Engels) [https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1886/ludwig-feuerbach/ch01.htm] -> there are some descriptions where you see them and you just know, I've seen this, this is ridiculously relatable across time periods. I haven't read these specific philosophies and yet just by that description I feel like I already have.

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

	== ~~Ideology codes~~ ==		== {{int:hue-prototype-trads-or-fields/en}} ==<!-- en: Ideologies or fields -->
			<ol class="hue clean terse">
	* ES / Existentialist-Structuralist tradition		{{li\|start=y
	* ES / bourgeois philosophies		\|I=S1/ES\|Q= 73\|Q2= 73}}{{TTS\|html=abbr\|class=hue-math-trad\|ES\|E-S}} / Existentialist-Structuralist tradition
			{{li\|I=S1/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|html=abbr\|class=hue-math-trad\|MN » ES\|Marxism onto agorism}} / bourgeois philosophies
			{{li\|I=S1/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|html=abbr\|class=hue-math-trad\|IV » ES\|Trotskyism onto agorism}} / pseudo-left tendencies
			{{li\|I=S1/ES\|Q=618\|Q2=618}}{{TTS\|html=abbr\|class=hue-math-trad\|MX ∘ ES\|meta-Marxism onto agorism}} / blue anarchisms
			</li></ol>

Reversedragon: Revolutions are a thing of the past

2026-08-24T20:09:55Z

Revolutions are a thing of the past

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:09, 24 August 2026
Line 30:		Line 30:
	<ol class="hue clean">		<ol class="hue clean">

	{{li\|start=y\|I=S2/ES\|tradition=LR, ES\|Q=618}}Revolutions are a thing of the past {{YouTube\|bKq-iip4LXs}} -> look closely and you'll see this is a rather uniquely anarchist idea. Bellegarrigue says this while completely bashing Liberal-republicanism for being a countable government instead of some kind of globally uncountable lack of government		{{li\|start=y\|I=S2/ES\|tradition=LR, ES\|Q=618}}Revolutions are a thing of the past {{YouTube\|bKq-iip4LXs}} / ({{9k\|RD/Q618-NoMoreRevolutions}}) -> look closely and you'll see this is a rather uniquely anarchist idea. Bellegarrigue says this while completely bashing Liberal-republicanism for being a countable government instead of some kind of globally uncountable lack of government

	{{li\|I=S2/LR\|tradition=\|Q=618}}Society surely cannot change more than it did in the creation of Liberal-republicanism {{YouTube\|LVq6GzfyGqI}} -> that is really one of the stupidest things I've ever heard, like almost literally the very stupidest thing you could say. you know why? if this is really true then there's literally no point in having democracy. the only way democracy maintains any hold over people is the promise that it can supposedly bring significant changes to society. Bernstein and Pablo and the Mensheviks [[E:Menshevism as Idealist economics\|actually understood that much]]! but if society actually isn't going to change any more, then there's no incentive to vote or believe in Liberal-republican parties and every incentive to discard government and attempt to create anarchism. of course, if you do that, people will flow around every which way and it will be impossible for society to attempt to regulate violence, and paradoxically, a battle between medium-sized businesses and billionaires will almost certainly happen. the moment society is unable to change any more is actually the moment it's most likely to change drastically. so trying to say it's hard to change society any more is the last thing you should be saying if you want to preserve Liberal-republicanism.		{{li\|I=S2/LR\|tradition=\|Q=618}}Society surely cannot change more than it did in the creation of Liberal-republicanism {{YouTube\|LVq6GzfyGqI}} -> that is really one of the stupidest things I've ever heard, like almost literally the very stupidest thing you could say. you know why? if this is really true then there's literally no point in having democracy. the only way democracy maintains any hold over people is the promise that it can supposedly bring significant changes to society. Bernstein and Pablo and the Mensheviks [[E:Menshevism as Idealist economics\|actually understood that much]]! but if society actually isn't going to change any more, then there's no incentive to vote or believe in Liberal-republican parties and every incentive to discard government and attempt to create anarchism. of course, if you do that, people will flow around every which way and it will be impossible for society to attempt to regulate violence, and paradoxically, a battle between medium-sized businesses and billionaires will almost certainly happen. the moment society is unable to change any more is actually the moment it's most likely to change drastically. so trying to say it's hard to change society any more is the last thing you should be saying if you want to preserve Liberal-republicanism.

Reversedragon: buried agorism

2026-07-28T06:33:32Z

buried agorism

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:33, 28 July 2026
Line 38:		Line 38:
	{{li\|I=S1/ES\|tradition=ES, LR, Aa\|Q=618}}"tacit knowledge" as euphemism for intuition [https://psyche.co/ideas/your-life-is-not-a-story-why-narrative-thinking-holds-you-back] / tacit knowledge (Existentialism) -> I swear right-Liberals use this word to launder non-supernatural superstition about the economy, linguists use versions of it to launder non-supernatural superstitions about meaning, reference, and learning that ultimately led to people thinking building artificial intuition into large language models was the only way to get better at modeling knowledge, and psychology and psychiatry are also misusing it somehow.<br/>		{{li\|I=S1/ES\|tradition=ES, LR, Aa\|Q=618}}"tacit knowledge" as euphemism for intuition [https://psyche.co/ideas/your-life-is-not-a-story-why-narrative-thinking-holds-you-back] / tacit knowledge (Existentialism) -> I swear right-Liberals use this word to launder non-supernatural superstition about the economy, linguists use versions of it to launder non-supernatural superstitions about meaning, reference, and learning that ultimately led to people thinking building artificial intuition into large language models was the only way to get better at modeling knowledge, and psychology and psychiatry are also misusing it somehow.<br/>
	tacit knowledge (Existentialism) + ?? = unsupervised machine learning. tacit knowledge (Existentialism) + ?? = large language model.		tacit knowledge (Existentialism) + ?? = unsupervised machine learning. tacit knowledge (Existentialism) + ?? = large language model.

			{{li\|I=S1/ES\|tradition=ES, LR, Aa\|Q=33,11\|Q2=3311}}buried agorism / buried Existentialism -> generic motif for discovering some period of Existentialism inside fiction. as this might be found in nearly any piece of fiction, there should be some very clear piece of evidence given for the themes being very specific and potentially unfamiliar ideas particular to Existentialist philosophy, thus making the reader ask "what is this and what is it doing in here?". the mere presence of something like character growth or identity doesn't inherently count as Existentialism. a more specific proposition such as "a [[E:The Subject\|Subject]] can decide on their own identity without the constant and inevitable input of others" (then where does their development come from?) or "nobody can ever predict other individuals" (even when we all have mirror neurons?) might very well count.
			{{li\|I=S1/ES\|dimension=L\|Q=310\|Q2=310}}buried Existentialism -> (number from first prototype before Lexemes became Terms, and were then replaced with disambiguation pages)

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

Reversedragon: Society surely cannot change more than it did in the creation of Liberal-republicanism

2026-06-29T08:03:56Z

Society surely cannot change more than it did in the creation of Liberal-republicanism

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:03, 29 June 2026
Line 31:		Line 31:

	{{li\|start=y\|I=S2/ES\|tradition=LR, ES\|Q=618}}Revolutions are a thing of the past {{YouTube\|bKq-iip4LXs}} -> look closely and you'll see this is a rather uniquely anarchist idea. Bellegarrigue says this while completely bashing Liberal-republicanism for being a countable government instead of some kind of globally uncountable lack of government		{{li\|start=y\|I=S2/ES\|tradition=LR, ES\|Q=618}}Revolutions are a thing of the past {{YouTube\|bKq-iip4LXs}} -> look closely and you'll see this is a rather uniquely anarchist idea. Bellegarrigue says this while completely bashing Liberal-republicanism for being a countable government instead of some kind of globally uncountable lack of government

			{{li\|I=S2/LR\|tradition=\|Q=618}}Society surely cannot change more than it did in the creation of Liberal-republicanism {{YouTube\|LVq6GzfyGqI}} -> that is really one of the stupidest things I've ever heard, like almost literally the very stupidest thing you could say. you know why? if this is really true then there's literally no point in having democracy. the only way democracy maintains any hold over people is the promise that it can supposedly bring significant changes to society. Bernstein and Pablo and the Mensheviks [[E:Menshevism as Idealist economics\|actually understood that much]]! but if society actually isn't going to change any more, then there's no incentive to vote or believe in Liberal-republican parties and every incentive to discard government and attempt to create anarchism. of course, if you do that, people will flow around every which way and it will be impossible for society to attempt to regulate violence, and paradoxically, a battle between medium-sized businesses and billionaires will almost certainly happen. the moment society is unable to change any more is actually the moment it's most likely to change drastically. so trying to say it's hard to change society any more is the last thing you should be saying if you want to preserve Liberal-republicanism.

			{{li\|I=S1/ES\|tradition=\|Q=618}}methodological individualism

	{{li\|I=S1/ES\|tradition=ES, LR, Aa\|Q=618}}"tacit knowledge" as euphemism for intuition [https://psyche.co/ideas/your-life-is-not-a-story-why-narrative-thinking-holds-you-back] / tacit knowledge (Existentialism) -> I swear right-Liberals use this word to launder non-supernatural superstition about the economy, linguists use versions of it to launder non-supernatural superstitions about meaning, reference, and learning that ultimately led to people thinking building artificial intuition into large language models was the only way to get better at modeling knowledge, and psychology and psychiatry are also misusing it somehow.<br/>		{{li\|I=S1/ES\|tradition=ES, LR, Aa\|Q=618}}"tacit knowledge" as euphemism for intuition [https://psyche.co/ideas/your-life-is-not-a-story-why-narrative-thinking-holds-you-back] / tacit knowledge (Existentialism) -> I swear right-Liberals use this word to launder non-supernatural superstition about the economy, linguists use versions of it to launder non-supernatural superstitions about meaning, reference, and learning that ultimately led to people thinking building artificial intuition into large language models was the only way to get better at modeling knowledge, and psychology and psychiatry are also misusing it somehow.<br/>

Reversedragon: typos

2026-06-07T12:44:50Z

typos

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:44, 7 June 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	<li class="field_exstruct" value="73" data-dimension="Z">[[Ontology:Q73\|Existentialist-Structuralist tradition]] / Existentialism (abbreviation) -> note, early-existentialism is already Q42		<li class="field_exstruct" value="73" data-dimension="Z">[[Ontology:Q73\|Existentialist-Structuralist tradition]] / Existentialism (abbreviation) -> note, early-existentialism is already Q42

	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="73" data-dimension="Z">~~[[Ontology:Q73\|~~Existentialist-Structuralist tradition] / political agorism (?)		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="73" data-dimension="Z">Existentialist-Structuralist tradition / political agorism (?)

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>
Line 23:		Line 23:
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="79" data-dimension="Z">post-Marxism		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="79" data-dimension="Z">post-Marxism

	{{li\|I=S1/Ag\|tradition=Ag, ES\|Q=618}}~~{{TTS\|Ag}} /~~ agorism -> this is.... possibly the most cohesive bit of material logic connecting all the other things here. I feel like in making this list or various other versions of it I have maybe actually been describing "political agorism"		{{li\|I=S1/Ag\|tradition=Ag, ES\|Q=618}}agorism -> this is.... possibly the most cohesive bit of material logic connecting all the other things here without introducing an "outside" philosophy to explain them. I feel like in making this list or various other versions of it I have maybe actually been describing "political agorism"

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

Reversedragon: agorism

2026-06-07T12:43:46Z

agorism

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:43, 7 June 2026
Line 4:		Line 4:

	<li class="field_exstruct" value="73" data-dimension="Z">[[Ontology:Q73\|Existentialist-Structuralist tradition]] / Existentialism (abbreviation) -> note, early-existentialism is already Q42		<li class="field_exstruct" value="73" data-dimension="Z">[[Ontology:Q73\|Existentialist-Structuralist tradition]] / Existentialism (abbreviation) -> note, early-existentialism is already Q42

			</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="73" data-dimension="Z">[[Ontology:Q73\|Existentialist-Structuralist tradition] / political agorism (?)

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

	== Potential members ==		== Potential members ==
	<ol class="hue clean">		<ol class="hue clean field_exstruct">

	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="72" data-dimension="Z">phenomenology / Husserl's phenomenology (Existentialism)		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="72" data-dimension="Z">phenomenology / Husserl's phenomenology (Existentialism)
Line 20:		Line 22:
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="78" data-dimension="S">alterity theories / postcolonial theories (theories about how colonialism is a prejudice about a group of people in someone's mind)		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="78" data-dimension="S">alterity theories / postcolonial theories (theories about how colonialism is a prejudice about a group of people in someone's mind)
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="79" data-dimension="Z">post-Marxism		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="79" data-dimension="Z">post-Marxism

			{{li\|I=S1/Ag\|tradition=Ag, ES\|Q=618}}{{TTS\|Ag}} / agorism -> this is.... possibly the most cohesive bit of material logic connecting all the other things here. I feel like in making this list or various other versions of it I have maybe actually been describing "political agorism"

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

Reversedragon: "tacit knowledge" as euphemism for intuition

2026-05-19T07:35:09Z

"tacit knowledge" as euphemism for intuition

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:35, 19 May 2026
Line 27:		Line 27:

	{{li\|start=y\|I=S2/ES\|tradition=LR, ES\|Q=618}}Revolutions are a thing of the past {{YouTube\|bKq-iip4LXs}} -> look closely and you'll see this is a rather uniquely anarchist idea. Bellegarrigue says this while completely bashing Liberal-republicanism for being a countable government instead of some kind of globally uncountable lack of government		{{li\|start=y\|I=S2/ES\|tradition=LR, ES\|Q=618}}Revolutions are a thing of the past {{YouTube\|bKq-iip4LXs}} -> look closely and you'll see this is a rather uniquely anarchist idea. Bellegarrigue says this while completely bashing Liberal-republicanism for being a countable government instead of some kind of globally uncountable lack of government

			{{li\|I=S1/ES\|tradition=ES, LR, Aa\|Q=618}}"tacit knowledge" as euphemism for intuition [https://psyche.co/ideas/your-life-is-not-a-story-why-narrative-thinking-holds-you-back] / tacit knowledge (Existentialism) -> I swear right-Liberals use this word to launder non-supernatural superstition about the economy, linguists use versions of it to launder non-supernatural superstitions about meaning, reference, and learning that ultimately led to people thinking building artificial intuition into large language models was the only way to get better at modeling knowledge, and psychology and psychiatry are also misusing it somehow.<br/>
			tacit knowledge (Existentialism) + ?? = unsupervised machine learning. tacit knowledge (Existentialism) + ?? = large language model.

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

Reversedragon: pauper's broth of eclecticism / change "alterity theories" to motif

2026-05-14T01:44:35Z

pauper's broth of eclecticism / change "alterity theories" to motif

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:44, 14 May 2026
Line 18:		Line 18:
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="76" data-dimension="Z">psychoanalysis / Freudian psychoanalysis (generic) / Lacanian psychoanalysis (generic)		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="76" data-dimension="Z">psychoanalysis / Freudian psychoanalysis (generic) / Lacanian psychoanalysis (generic)
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="77" data-dimension="Z">schizoanalysis		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="77" data-dimension="Z">schizoanalysis
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="78" data-dimension="Z">alterity theories / postcolonial theories (theories about how colonialism is a prejudice about a group of people in someone's mind)		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="78" data-dimension="S">alterity theories / postcolonial theories (theories about how colonialism is a prejudice about a group of people in someone's mind)
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="79" data-dimension="Z">post-Marxism		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="79" data-dimension="Z">post-Marxism

Line 35:		Line 35:
	<li class="field_exstruct" data-remark="one basic precursor to E-S trad" value="70" data-dimension="Z">analytic philosophy		<li class="field_exstruct" data-remark="one basic precursor to E-S trad" value="70" data-dimension="Z">analytic philosophy
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="71" data-dimension="S0">field of study diagramming signs and signifiers / semiotics (generic) / structuralist linguistics (generic) / meta-ontology (generic)		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="71" data-dimension="S0">field of study diagramming signs and signifiers / semiotics (generic) / structuralist linguistics (generic) / meta-ontology (generic)

			{{li\|I=S1/ES/ML\|Q=618}}the eclectic gruel of philosophy / the pauper's broth of eclecticism which is ladled out in the universities under the name of philosophy (Engels) [https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1886/ludwig-feuerbach/ch01.htm] -> there are some descriptions where you see them and you just know, I've seen this, this is ridiculously relatable across time periods. I haven't read these specific philosophies and yet just by that description I feel like I already have.

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>
Line 40:		Line 42:
	== Ideology codes ==		== Ideology codes ==

	* ~~(none)~~		* ES / Existentialist-Structuralist tradition
			* ES / bourgeois philosophies

Reversedragon: Reversedragon moved page User:RD/9k/Q73 to Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q73: Moving 9k pages to Ontology talk for search purposes

2026-04-14T05:17:24Z

Reversedragon moved page User:RD/9k/Q73 to Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q73: Moving 9k pages to Ontology talk for search purposes

← Older revision	Revision as of 05:17, 14 April 2026
(No difference)

Reversedragon: Revolutions are a thing of the past

2026-03-30T23:15:03Z

Revolutions are a thing of the past

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:15, 30 March 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{NextNineThousand\|PPPA=Existentialist-Structuralist tradition\|User=RD\|E=Q73\|Contents=y}}		{{NextNineThousand\|PPPA=Existentialist-Structuralist tradition\|User=RD\|E=Q73\|Contents=y}}
	~~== Ontology page ==~~
	~~{{HueNumberPreview\|E=Q73}}~~

	== Main entry ==		== Main entry ==
	~~<noinclude>~~{{HueCSS}}~~</noinclude>~~<ol class="hue clean">		{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean">

	<li class="field_exstruct" value="73" data-dimension="Z">[[Ontology:Q73\|Existentialist-Structuralist tradition]] / Existentialism (abbreviation) -> note, early-existentialism is already Q42		<li class="field_exstruct" value="73" data-dimension="Z">[[Ontology:Q73\|Existentialist-Structuralist tradition]] / Existentialism (abbreviation) -> note, early-existentialism is already Q42
Line 11:		Line 8:

	== Potential members ==		== Potential members ==

	<ol class="hue clean">		<ol class="hue clean">

Line 24:		Line 20:
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="78" data-dimension="Z">alterity theories / postcolonial theories (theories about how colonialism is a prejudice about a group of people in someone's mind)		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="78" data-dimension="Z">alterity theories / postcolonial theories (theories about how colonialism is a prejudice about a group of people in someone's mind)
	</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="79" data-dimension="Z">post-Marxism		</li><li class="field_exstruct" value="79" data-dimension="Z">post-Marxism

			</li></ol>

			== Common motifs or claims ==
			<ol class="hue clean">

			{{li\|start=y\|I=S2/ES\|tradition=LR, ES\|Q=618}}Revolutions are a thing of the past {{YouTube\|bKq-iip4LXs}} -> look closely and you'll see this is a rather uniquely anarchist idea. Bellegarrigue says this while completely bashing Liberal-republicanism for being a countable government instead of some kind of globally uncountable lack of government

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

	== Related ==		== Related ==

	<ol class="hue clean">		<ol class="hue clean">

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:03, 29 June 2026
Line 31:		Line 31:

	{{li\|start=y\|I=S2/ES\|tradition=LR, ES\|Q=618}}Revolutions are a thing of the past {{YouTube\|bKq-iip4LXs}} -> look closely and you'll see this is a rather uniquely anarchist idea. Bellegarrigue says this while completely bashing Liberal-republicanism for being a countable government instead of some kind of globally uncountable lack of government		{{li\|start=y\|I=S2/ES\|tradition=LR, ES\|Q=618}}Revolutions are a thing of the past {{YouTube\|bKq-iip4LXs}} -> look closely and you'll see this is a rather uniquely anarchist idea. Bellegarrigue says this while completely bashing Liberal-republicanism for being a countable government instead of some kind of globally uncountable lack of government

			{{li\|I=S2/LR\|tradition=\|Q=618}}Society surely cannot change more than it did in the creation of Liberal-republicanism {{YouTube\|LVq6GzfyGqI}} -> that is really one of the stupidest things I've ever heard, like almost literally the very stupidest thing you could say. you know why? if this is really true then there's literally no point in having democracy. the only way democracy maintains any hold over people is the promise that it can supposedly bring significant changes to society. Bernstein and Pablo and the Mensheviks [[E:Menshevism as Idealist economics\|actually understood that much]]! but if society actually isn't going to change any more, then there's no incentive to vote or believe in Liberal-republican parties and every incentive to discard government and attempt to create anarchism. of course, if you do that, people will flow around every which way and it will be impossible for society to attempt to regulate violence, and paradoxically, a battle between medium-sized businesses and billionaires will almost certainly happen. the moment society is unable to change any more is actually the moment it's most likely to change drastically. so trying to say it's hard to change society any more is the last thing you should be saying if you want to preserve Liberal-republicanism.

			{{li\|I=S1/ES\|tradition=\|Q=618}}methodological individualism

	{{li\|I=S1/ES\|tradition=ES, LR, Aa\|Q=618}}"tacit knowledge" as euphemism for intuition [https://psyche.co/ideas/your-life-is-not-a-story-why-narrative-thinking-holds-you-back] / tacit knowledge (Existentialism) -> I swear right-Liberals use this word to launder non-supernatural superstition about the economy, linguists use versions of it to launder non-supernatural superstitions about meaning, reference, and learning that ultimately led to people thinking building artificial intuition into large language models was the only way to get better at modeling knowledge, and psychology and psychiatry are also misusing it somehow.<br/>		{{li\|I=S1/ES\|tradition=ES, LR, Aa\|Q=618}}"tacit knowledge" as euphemism for intuition [https://psyche.co/ideas/your-life-is-not-a-story-why-narrative-thinking-holds-you-back] / tacit knowledge (Existentialism) -> I swear right-Liberals use this word to launder non-supernatural superstition about the economy, linguists use versions of it to launder non-supernatural superstitions about meaning, reference, and learning that ultimately led to people thinking building artificial intuition into large language models was the only way to get better at modeling knowledge, and psychology and psychiatry are also misusing it somehow.<br/>