Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q76,70 - Revision history

Reversedragon: note

2026-09-24T16:30:43Z

note

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:30, 24 September 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean"><!-- inactive: {{int:hue-ixn-classname-DFy}} {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}} -->		{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean"><!-- inactive: {{int:hue-ixn-classname-DFy}} {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}} -->

	{{li\|start=y\|I=S2/MX\|tradition=MX\|Q=76,70\|Q2=7670}}Post-~~structuralist linguistics~~ allows the United States to refuse to recognize Russia / Post-structuralist linguistics enables United States people to refuse to recognize the entire country of Russia and its government and declare all Russians Americans without questioning any definition of "the United States", "United States people", or "White people" -><br/>		{{li\|start=y\|I=S2/MX\|tradition=MX\|Q=76,70\|Q2=7670}}Post-structuralism allows the United States to refuse to recognize Russia / <s>Post-structuralist linguistics</s> Post-structuralist analysis enables United States people to refuse to recognize the entire country of Russia and its government and declare all Russians Americans without questioning any definition of "the United States", "United States people", or "White people" -><br/>
	think about it. like, in practice, what {{em\|actually stops people from using it this way}}? what actually makes them re-examine any of their previous assumptions aside from any particular one they notice at the moment? linguistics is not a field that's bound by ethics, anyone can just go around using it unprofessionally. so I'd think that having a sound theory without glitches in it is actually much more important rather than less important.<br/>		think about it. like, in practice, what {{em\|actually stops people from using it this way}}? what actually makes them re-examine any of their previous assumptions aside from any particular one they notice at the moment? linguistics is not a field that's bound by ethics, anyone can just go around using it unprofessionally. so I'd think that having a sound theory without glitches in it is actually much more important rather than less important.<br/>
	there has to be something wrong here but I have no idea what it is.		there has to be something wrong here but I have no idea what it is.

			{{li\|I=S2/MX\|tradition=MX\|Q=76,70\|Q2=7670}}Post-structuralist linguistics allows the United States to refuse to recognize Russia -> here "the United States" doesn't refer to the nation-state, and also doesn't refer to the president. because I really doubt that any U.S. president has ever understood much of contemporary academic philosophy in their time to be frank about it. a representative or two knowing what this is and horribly botching it? yeah, maybe, they have to talk about all kinds of things and they very often don't understand them at all especially when they have to do with technology or they're very recent.

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

Reversedragon: Reversedragon moved page Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q7670 to Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q76,70: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title

2026-09-24T14:33:58Z

Reversedragon moved page Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q7670 to Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q76,70: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title

← Older revision	Revision as of 14:33, 24 September 2026
(No difference)

Reversedragon: copy markup from Q55,56

2026-09-24T14:33:36Z

copy markup from Q55,56

New page

{{NextNineThousand|PPPA=post-structuralists vs Russians|E=Q76,70|User=RD|Contents=y}}
== Main entry ==
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean">

{{li|start=y|I=S2/MX|tradition=MX|Q=76,70|Q2=7670}}Post-structuralist linguistics allows the United States to refuse to recognize Russia / Post-structuralist linguistics enables United States people to refuse to recognize the entire country of Russia and its government and declare all Russians Americans without questioning any definition of "the United States", "United States people", or "White people" -><br/>
think about it. like, in practice, what {{em|actually stops people from using it this way}}? what actually makes them re-examine any of their previous assumptions aside from any particular one they notice at the moment? linguistics is not a field that's bound by ethics, anyone can just go around using it unprofessionally. so I'd think that having a sound theory without glitches in it is actually much more important rather than less important.<br/>
there has to be something wrong here but I have no idea what it is.

</li></ol>

== Related ==
<ol class="hue clean">
</li></ol>

== {{int:hue-prototype-trads-fields-or-genres}} == 




[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]]