Research:MDem/5.2r/0999 cosm-letter2 - Revision history

Reversedragon: edit for nominal objectivity

2026-03-22T09:34:10Z

edit for nominal objectivity

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:34, 22 March 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{BopCSS}}<div class="bop top"><h3><time datetime="2026-03-19T18:05:25H">3-19</time></h3>		{{BopCSS}}<div class="bop top"><h3><time datetime="2026-03-19T18:05:25H">3-19</time></h3>
	~~<div>~~So, I do not even know if I have the right email address, and I apologize if I wasn't supposed to use this address for some reason.		So, I do not even know if I have the right email address, and I apologize if I wasn't supposed to use this address for some reason.

	But, under the assumption this actually is the right address for ~~J. Moufawad-Paul~~, I have been working on a philosophical framework called "[[E:Q92\|violet Marxism]]" or alternatively "meta-Marxism", and was wondering if you would be interested in reviewing it.		But, under the assumption this actually is the right address for {{thingamabob\|[Marxist author]}}, I have been working on a philosophical framework called "[[E:Q92\|violet Marxism]]" or alternatively "meta-Marxism", and was wondering if you would be interested in reviewing it.

	I will first clarify up front that this is a strictly Materialist framework which does not attempt to redo Marx's understanding of the connection between parties, theory, and practice, and if you have ever seen the term "meta-Marxism" used before this was not influenced by nor has anything to do with any of those other "meta-Marxisms". (Thanks to [[Special:PermanentLink/41296\|Althusser]] using "meta-Marxism" to suggest that "science" and Marxism needed to be separated, I have to clarify that what I am talking about is violet Marxism and not that.)		I will first clarify up front that this is a strictly Materialist framework which does not attempt to redo Marx's understanding of the connection between parties, theory, and practice, and if you have ever seen the term "meta-Marxism" used before this was not influenced by nor has anything to do with any of those other "meta-Marxisms". (Thanks to [[Special:PermanentLink/41296\|Althusser]] using "meta-Marxism" to suggest that "science" and Marxism needed to be separated, I have to clarify that what I am talking about is violet Marxism and not that.)<br/>
	Second, what I'm attaching is not an exhaustive explanation of violet Marxism. I have an absurd number of [[Philosophical Research:MDem\|book-related drafts]] and now [[User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand\|a large number of early, "prototype" wiki pages]] about it covering a lot of different thematic areas, but what I've attached here is relatively short — which may be for the best when I know anyone who teaches classes will be busy. (In 2024 I tried several times to type out a long letter attempting to give an outline of {{em\|all}} the basic concepts, but I never finished that one, so this is my last try to get something out.)		Second, what I'm attaching is not an exhaustive explanation of violet Marxism. I have an absurd number of [[Philosophical Research:MDem\|book-related drafts]] and now [[User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand\|a large number of early, "prototype" wiki pages]] about it covering a lot of different thematic areas, but what I've attached here is relatively short — which may be for the best when I know anyone who teaches classes will be busy. (In 2024 I tried several times to type out a long letter attempting to give an outline of {{em\|all}} the basic concepts, but I never finished that one, so this is my last try to get something out.)

	The other thing I should probably say is, I am not a professor or any kind of university faculty, I am just someone who started wildly writing a giant book one day about how everyone in the United States gets Marxism and philosophy wrong because since 2016 it's been basically impossible to actually live and exist in the United States and I was tired of that. I have never actually been able to be employed or be part of society due to disabilities and it never seems to get easier. So, I have never actually been involved in movements for {{censor\|P\|alestine\|\|tts=P-country}}. I just do a lot of reading about science and history from about either the 1600s or 1900s to today and contemporary news events and trying to characterize what dialectical materialism is and isn't and what is a reasonable Materialist theory based on that. {{cite\|The Communist Necessity}} was a big influence on me. But when looking through articles on "M-~~L-M Mayhem~~" on a web archive, I thought those articles had a good perspective. In my mind, violet Marxism is a very versatile thing and it {{em\|could}} be used to criticize Marxist theories or organizations that are failing to break away from {{censor\|I\|srael\|\|tts=I-country}} and probe the material reasons why; I just had not been actively putting it toward that use because the kinds of people who cared about {{censor\|P\|alestine\|\|tts=P-country}} where I was were {{em\|so}} anticommunist and utterly anti-materialist they almost weren't going to let me be part of anything if I believed in Materialism, and thus I'd gotten it into my head I'd never be good at it, and I was busy studying other historical events that I felt like I was doing a better job understanding.		The other thing I should probably say is, I am not a professor or any kind of university faculty, I am just someone who started wildly writing a giant book one day about how everyone in the United States gets Marxism and philosophy wrong because since 2016 it's been basically impossible to actually live and exist in the United States and I was tired of that. I have never actually been able to be employed or be part of society due to disabilities and it never seems to get easier. So, I have never actually been involved in movements for {{censor\|P\|alestine\|\|tts=P-country}}. I just do a lot of reading about science and history from about either the 1600s or 1900s to today and contemporary news events and trying to characterize what dialectical materialism is and isn't and what is a reasonable Materialist theory based on that. {{cite\|The Communist Necessity}} was a big influence on me. But when looking through articles on "{{thingamabob\|[author's blog largely on P-country and Algeria]}}" on a web archive, I thought those articles had a good perspective. In my mind, violet Marxism is a very versatile thing and it {{em\|could}} be used to criticize Marxist theories or organizations that are failing to break away from {{censor\|I\|srael\|\|tts=I-country}} and probe the material reasons why; I just had not been actively putting it toward that use because the kinds of people who cared about {{censor\|P\|alestine\|\|tts=P-country}} where I was were {{em\|so}} anticommunist and utterly anti-materialist they almost weren't going to let me be part of anything if I believed in Materialism, and thus I'd gotten it into my head I'd never be good at it, and I was busy studying other historical events that I felt like I was doing a better job understanding.<br/>
	(Here's hoping nobody snatches this message in transit based on it containing certain words. It's getting bad over here.)		(Here's hoping nobody snatches this message in transit based on it containing certain words. It's getting bad over here.)

Line 25:		Line 25:

	— R. Bergfalk / "R.D."		— R. Bergfalk / "R.D."
	~~</div>~~</div>		</div>

	<div class="bop bottom"><h3><time datetime="2026-03-20T19:27:25H">3-20</time></h3>		<div class="bop bottom"><h3><time datetime="2026-03-20T19:27:25H">3-20</time></h3>
Line 34:		Line 34:
	== Footnotes ==		== Footnotes ==

	# For anyone who is new to this site: no other page on this wiki normally censors "Israel" or "Palestine". That was specifically related to this being an e-mail message that could theoretically get shredded in a filter or seen over the wrong person's shoulder while at work. Not that blotting out the word ~~fully~~ helps with the second situation, but the instances where the words weren't even said in the sentence ("those countries") {{em\|would}} make the message harder to catch at a glance.		# For anyone who is new to this site: no other page on this wiki normally censors "Israel" or "Palestine". That was part of the original text when it was sent, and was specifically related to this being an e-mail message that could theoretically get shredded in a filter or seen over the wrong person's shoulder while at work. Not that blotting out the word helps very much with the second situation, but the instances where the words weren't even said in the sentence ("those countries") {{em\|would}} make the message harder to catch at a glance.

	<!--		<!--

Reversedragon: links and censor bar formatting

2026-03-22T09:18:52Z

links and censor bar formatting

Reversedragon: "apology"

2026-03-22T08:50:09Z

"apology"

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:50, 22 March 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{BopCSS}}<div class="bop top"><h3><time datetime="~~asdfsdf~~">26-3</time></h3>		{{BopCSS}}<div class="bop top"><h3><time datetime="2026-03-19T18:05:25H">3-19</time></h3>
	<div>So, I do not even know if I have the right email address, and I apologize if I wasn't supposed to use this address for some reason.		<div>So, I do not even know if I have the right email address, and I apologize if I wasn't supposed to use this address for some reason.

Line 14:		Line 14:
	Attached files:		Attached files:

	* {{b\|"cosmonaut-letter"}} — basic overview of what violet Marxism is; short. (3600 words)		* {{b\|"[[Philosophical_Research:MDem/5.2r/0999_rake-grass\|cosmonaut-letter]]"}} — basic overview of what violet Marxism is; short. (3600 words)
	* "comments" — miscellaneous thoughts/notes I actually scrawled in long YouTube comments but which are somewhat representative of what my book chapter drafts talk about in a much shorter format; each one is basically just an attempt to do violet Marxism on some particular ideology. (7000 words)		* "[[redlink\|comments]]" — miscellaneous thoughts/notes I actually scrawled in long YouTube comments but which are somewhat representative of what my book chapter drafts talk about in a much shorter format; each one is basically just an attempt to do violet Marxism on some particular ideology. (7000 words)
	* "9k/Q21,29" — example page from the wiki that is 'a companion to my unfinished book introducing violet Marxism'; relatively informal-tone page taking notes to analyze an article, not to be taken too seriously as something "complete". This page is mostly just here to visually demonstrate the concept of ideology swatches or symbols, and pairing particular propositions and comments on propositions to particular ideology colors they either embody or analyze. But, the page is about Althusser's "meta-Marxism" versus violet Marxism. (3900 words)		* "[[Special:PermanentLink/41296\|9k/Q21,29]]" — example page from the wiki that is 'a companion to my unfinished book introducing violet Marxism'; relatively informal-tone page taking notes to analyze an article, not to be taken too seriously as something "complete". This page is mostly just here to visually demonstrate the concept of ideology swatches or symbols, and pairing particular propositions and comments on propositions to particular ideology colors they either embody or analyze. But, the page is about Althusser's "meta-Marxism" versus violet Marxism. (3900 words)
	** This is a saved HTML page. I checked it over a couple times to make sure there were no serious glitches. The page contains live links to the wiki I didn't remove. These live pages may contain problems like broken swatches, unfinished explanations, etc.		** This is a saved HTML page. I checked it over a couple times to make sure there were no serious glitches. The page contains live links to the wiki I didn't remove. These live pages may contain problems like broken swatches, unfinished explanations, etc.
	* "socialism" — observations on what an era of socialism actually looks like most of the times it's happened in reality. This is an excerpt taken out of an unfinished article (an 'actually-serious Cosmonaut letter') I was writing to vaguely try to persuade Trotskyists that other Marxisms are valid while arguing that there are also conditions where if they fixed up their theories other Marxisms would finally accept them. This general idea of, "do you want world socialism or not?" (3500 words)		* "[[redlink\|socialism]]" — observations on what an era of socialism actually looks like most of the times it's happened in reality. This is an excerpt taken out of an unfinished article (an 'actually-serious Cosmonaut letter') I was writing to vaguely try to persuade Trotskyists that other Marxisms are valid while arguing that there are also conditions where if they fixed up their theories other Marxisms would finally accept them. This general idea of, "do you want world socialism or not?" (3500 words)
	* {{b\|"findings"}} — my attempt to summarize various working conclusions I've come to since starting the wiki; the results of applying meta-Marxism to characterize various things. (14,600 words)		* {{b\|"[[redlink\|findings]]"}} — my attempt to summarize various working conclusions I've come to since starting the wiki; the results of applying meta-Marxism to characterize various things. (14,600 words)
	** In this file I stopped censoring 'those countries' because I simply got tired of it. Hopefully when it's buried far enough into this message that won't practically matter.		** In this file I stopped censoring 'those countries' because I simply got tired of it. Hopefully when it's buried far enough into this message that won't practically matter.

Line 26:		Line 26:
	— R. Bergfalk / "R.D."		— R. Bergfalk / "R.D."
	</div></div>		</div></div>

			<div class="bop"><h3><time datetime="2026-03-20T19:27:25H">3-20</time></h3>
			I acknowledge I may have said some stupid things about Deng Xiaoping Thought in the "findings" file or otherwise.<br/>
			This is why I had to actually try to stop doing all of this in an isolated room and show it to {{em\|someone}}. So it could improve. I knew that if the methods of violet Marxism were any good, despite being the one who compiled the methods, I would definitely not be at the deepest levels of understanding on any of the individual ideologies I was studying and modeling and trying to give a big-picture account of, so I probably would not actually be the best person to send out to be applying any of this. I am always in this terrible conundrum that I am the least stupid person in my area about what ideologies and historical periods are and how they work to the point I never have anyone else to ask for help on how to solve problems and yet after focusing most of my energy every day on trying to learn and synthesize things I still end up feeling like I am the worst Marxist theorist and I know nothing.
			</div>

	<!--		<!--

Reversedragon: archive letter as-is; sent 2026-03-19T18:05:25H

2026-03-22T08:02:50Z

archive letter as-is; sent 2026-03-19T18:05:25H

New page

{{BopCSS}}<div class="bop top"><h3><time datetime="asdfsdf">26-3</time></h3>
<div>So, I do not even know if I have the right email address, and I apologize if I wasn't supposed to use this address for some reason.

But, under the assumption this actually is the right address for J. Moufawad-Paul, I have been working on a philosophical framework called "violet Marxism" or alternatively "meta-Marxism", and was wondering if you would be interested in reviewing it.

I will first clarify up front that this is a strictly Materialist framework which does not attempt to redo Marx's understanding of the connection between parties, theory, and practice, and if you have ever seen the term "meta-Marxism" used before this was not influenced by nor has anything to do with any of those other "meta-Marxisms". (Thanks to Althusser using "meta-Marxism" to suggest that "science" and Marxism needed to be separated, I have to clarify that what I am talking about is violet Marxism and not that.)
Second, what I'm attaching is not an exhaustive explanation of violet Marxism. I have an absurd number of book-related drafts and now a large number of early, "prototype" wiki pages about it covering a lot of different thematic areas, but what I've attached here is relatively short — which may be for the best when I know anyone who teaches classes will be busy. (In 2024 I tried several times to type out a long letter attempting to give an outline of {{em|all}} the basic concepts, but I never finished that one, so this is my last try to get something out.)

The other thing I should probably say is, I am not a professor or any kind of university faculty, I am just someone who started wildly writing a giant book one day about how everyone in the United States gets Marxism and philosophy wrong because since 2016 it's been basically impossible to actually live and exist in the United States and I was tired of that. I have never actually been able to be employed or be part of society due to disabilities and it never seems to get easier. So, I have never actually been involved in movements for P########. I just do a lot of reading about science and history from about either the 1600s or 1900s to today and contemporary news events and trying to characterize what dialectical materialism is and isn't and what is a reasonable Materialist theory based on that. {{cite|The Communist Necessity}} was a big influence on me. But when looking through articles on "M-L-M Mayhem" on a web archive, I thought those articles had a good perspective. In my mind, violet Marxism is a very versatile thing and it {{em|could}} be used to criticize Marxist theories or organizations that are failing to break away from I##### and probe the material reasons why; I just had not been actively putting it toward that use because the kinds of people who cared about P######## where I was were {{em|so}} anticommunist and utterly anti-materialist they almost weren't going to let me be part of anything if I believed in Materialism, and thus I'd gotten it into my head I'd never be good at it, and I was busy studying other historical events that I felt like I was doing a better job understanding.
(Here's hoping nobody snatches this message in transit based on it containing certain words. It's getting bad over here.)

Violet Marxism is the Marxist study of countably separate Marxisms as material objects in development and motion, in the midst of a dialectical universe built on special relativity.

Attached files:

* {{b|"cosmonaut-letter"}} — basic overview of what violet Marxism is; short. (3600 words)
* "comments" — miscellaneous thoughts/notes I actually scrawled in long YouTube comments but which are somewhat representative of what my book chapter drafts talk about in a much shorter format; each one is basically just an attempt to do violet Marxism on some particular ideology. (7000 words)
* "9k/Q21,29" — example page from the wiki that is 'a companion to my unfinished book introducing violet Marxism'; relatively informal-tone page taking notes to analyze an article, not to be taken too seriously as something "complete". This page is mostly just here to visually demonstrate the concept of ideology swatches or symbols, and pairing particular propositions and comments on propositions to particular ideology colors they either embody or analyze. But, the page is about Althusser's "meta-Marxism" versus violet Marxism. (3900 words)
** This is a saved HTML page. I checked it over a couple times to make sure there were no serious glitches. The page contains live links to the wiki I didn't remove. These live pages may contain problems like broken swatches, unfinished explanations, etc.
* "socialism" — observations on what an era of socialism actually looks like most of the times it's happened in reality. This is an excerpt taken out of an unfinished article (an 'actually-serious Cosmonaut letter') I was writing to vaguely try to persuade Trotskyists that other Marxisms are valid while arguing that there are also conditions where if they fixed up their theories other Marxisms would finally accept them. This general idea of, "do you want world socialism or not?" (3500 words)
* {{b|"findings"}} — my attempt to summarize various working conclusions I've come to since starting the wiki; the results of applying meta-Marxism to characterize various things. (14,600 words)
** In this file I stopped censoring 'those countries' because I simply got tired of it. Hopefully when it's buried far enough into this message that won't practically matter.

Out of these five files, the first and the last ("cosmonaut-letter" and "findings") are the most important ones. The others provide a lot of helpful context though.

— R. Bergfalk / "R.D."
</div></div>


[[Category:MDem v5.3 entries]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:18, 22 March 2026
Line 2:		Line 2:
	<div>So, I do not even know if I have the right email address, and I apologize if I wasn't supposed to use this address for some reason.		<div>So, I do not even know if I have the right email address, and I apologize if I wasn't supposed to use this address for some reason.

	But, under the assumption this actually is the right address for J. Moufawad-Paul, I have been working on a philosophical framework called "violet Marxism" or alternatively "meta-Marxism", and was wondering if you would be interested in reviewing it.		But, under the assumption this actually is the right address for J. Moufawad-Paul, I have been working on a philosophical framework called "[[E:Q92\|violet Marxism]]" or alternatively "meta-Marxism", and was wondering if you would be interested in reviewing it.

	I will first clarify up front that this is a strictly Materialist framework which does not attempt to redo Marx's understanding of the connection between parties, theory, and practice, and if you have ever seen the term "meta-Marxism" used before this was not influenced by nor has anything to do with any of those other "meta-Marxisms". (Thanks to Althusser using "meta-Marxism" to suggest that "science" and Marxism needed to be separated, I have to clarify that what I am talking about is violet Marxism and not that.)		I will first clarify up front that this is a strictly Materialist framework which does not attempt to redo Marx's understanding of the connection between parties, theory, and practice, and if you have ever seen the term "meta-Marxism" used before this was not influenced by nor has anything to do with any of those other "meta-Marxisms". (Thanks to [[Special:PermanentLink/41296\|Althusser]] using "meta-Marxism" to suggest that "science" and Marxism needed to be separated, I have to clarify that what I am talking about is violet Marxism and not that.)
	Second, what I'm attaching is not an exhaustive explanation of violet Marxism. I have an absurd number of book-related drafts and now a large number of early, "prototype" wiki pages about it covering a lot of different thematic areas, but what I've attached here is relatively short — which may be for the best when I know anyone who teaches classes will be busy. (In 2024 I tried several times to type out a long letter attempting to give an outline of {{em\|all}} the basic concepts, but I never finished that one, so this is my last try to get something out.)		Second, what I'm attaching is not an exhaustive explanation of violet Marxism. I have an absurd number of [[Philosophical Research:MDem\|book-related drafts]] and now [[User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand\|a large number of early, "prototype" wiki pages]] about it covering a lot of different thematic areas, but what I've attached here is relatively short — which may be for the best when I know anyone who teaches classes will be busy. (In 2024 I tried several times to type out a long letter attempting to give an outline of {{em\|all}} the basic concepts, but I never finished that one, so this is my last try to get something out.)

	The other thing I should probably say is, I am not a professor or any kind of university faculty, I am just someone who started wildly writing a giant book one day about how everyone in the United States gets Marxism and philosophy wrong because since 2016 it's been basically impossible to actually live and exist in the United States and I was tired of that. I have never actually been able to be employed or be part of society due to disabilities and it never seems to get easier. So, I have never actually been involved in movements for P~~########~~. I just do a lot of reading about science and history from about either the 1600s or 1900s to today and contemporary news events and trying to characterize what dialectical materialism is and isn't and what is a reasonable Materialist theory based on that. {{cite\|The Communist Necessity}} was a big influence on me. But when looking through articles on "M-L-M Mayhem" on a web archive, I thought those articles had a good perspective. In my mind, violet Marxism is a very versatile thing and it {{em\|could}} be used to criticize Marxist theories or organizations that are failing to break away from I~~#####~~ and probe the material reasons why; I just had not been actively putting it toward that use because the kinds of people who cared about P~~########~~ where I was were {{em\|so}} anticommunist and utterly anti-materialist they almost weren't going to let me be part of anything if I believed in Materialism, and thus I'd gotten it into my head I'd never be good at it, and I was busy studying other historical events that I felt like I was doing a better job understanding.		The other thing I should probably say is, I am not a professor or any kind of university faculty, I am just someone who started wildly writing a giant book one day about how everyone in the United States gets Marxism and philosophy wrong because since 2016 it's been basically impossible to actually live and exist in the United States and I was tired of that. I have never actually been able to be employed or be part of society due to disabilities and it never seems to get easier. So, I have never actually been involved in movements for {{censor\|P\|alestine\|\|tts=P-country}}. I just do a lot of reading about science and history from about either the 1600s or 1900s to today and contemporary news events and trying to characterize what dialectical materialism is and isn't and what is a reasonable Materialist theory based on that. {{cite\|The Communist Necessity}} was a big influence on me. But when looking through articles on "M-L-M Mayhem" on a web archive, I thought those articles had a good perspective. In my mind, violet Marxism is a very versatile thing and it {{em\|could}} be used to criticize Marxist theories or organizations that are failing to break away from {{censor\|I\|srael\|\|tts=I-country}} and probe the material reasons why; I just had not been actively putting it toward that use because the kinds of people who cared about {{censor\|P\|alestine\|\|tts=P-country}} where I was were {{em\|so}} anticommunist and utterly anti-materialist they almost weren't going to let me be part of anything if I believed in Materialism, and thus I'd gotten it into my head I'd never be good at it, and I was busy studying other historical events that I felt like I was doing a better job understanding.
	(Here's hoping nobody snatches this message in transit based on it containing certain words. It's getting bad over here.)		(Here's hoping nobody snatches this message in transit based on it containing certain words. It's getting bad over here.)

Line 15:		Line 15:

	* {{b\|"[[Philosophical_Research:MDem/5.2r/0999_rake-grass\|cosmonaut-letter]]"}} — basic overview of what violet Marxism is; short. (3600 words)		* {{b\|"[[Philosophical_Research:MDem/5.2r/0999_rake-grass\|cosmonaut-letter]]"}} — basic overview of what violet Marxism is; short. (3600 words)
	* "[[~~redlink~~\|comments]]" — miscellaneous thoughts/notes I actually scrawled in long YouTube comments but which are somewhat representative of what my book chapter drafts talk about in a much shorter format; each one is basically just an attempt to do violet Marxism on some particular ideology. (7000 words)		* "[[Philosophical Research:MDem/5.2r/0999 cosm-letter2/comments\|comments]]" — miscellaneous thoughts/notes I actually scrawled in long YouTube comments but which are somewhat representative of what my book chapter drafts talk about in a much shorter format; each one is basically just an attempt to do violet Marxism on some particular ideology. (7000 words)
	* "[[Special:PermanentLink/41296\|9k/Q21,29]]" — example page from the wiki that is 'a companion to my unfinished book introducing violet Marxism'; relatively informal-tone page taking notes to analyze an article, not to be taken too seriously as something "complete". This page is mostly just here to visually demonstrate the concept of ideology swatches or symbols, and pairing particular propositions and comments on propositions to particular ideology colors they either embody or analyze. But, the page is about Althusser's "meta-Marxism" versus violet Marxism. (3900 words)		* "[[Special:PermanentLink/41296\|9k/Q21,29]]" — example page from the wiki that is 'a companion to my unfinished book introducing violet Marxism'; relatively informal-tone page taking notes to analyze an article, not to be taken too seriously as something "complete". This page is mostly just here to visually demonstrate the concept of ideology swatches or symbols, and pairing particular propositions and comments on propositions to particular ideology colors they either embody or analyze. But, the page is about Althusser's "meta-Marxism" versus violet Marxism. (3900 words)
	** This is a saved HTML page. I checked it over a couple times to make sure there were no serious glitches. The page contains live links to the wiki I didn't remove. These live pages may contain problems like broken swatches, unfinished explanations, etc.		** This is a saved HTML page. I checked it over a couple times to make sure there were no serious glitches. The page contains live links to the wiki I didn't remove. These live pages may contain problems like broken swatches, unfinished explanations, etc.
	* "[[~~redlink~~\|socialism]]" — observations on what an era of socialism actually looks like most of the times it's happened in reality. This is an excerpt taken out of an unfinished article (an 'actually-serious Cosmonaut letter') I was writing to vaguely try to persuade Trotskyists that other Marxisms are valid while arguing that there are also conditions where if they fixed up their theories other Marxisms would finally accept them. This general idea of, "do you want world socialism or not?" (3500 words)		* "[[Philosophical Research:MDem/5.2r/0999 cosm-letter2/socialism\|socialism]]" — observations on what an era of socialism actually looks like most of the times it's happened in reality. This is an excerpt taken out of an unfinished article (an 'actually-serious Cosmonaut letter') I was writing to vaguely try to persuade Trotskyists that other Marxisms are valid while arguing that there are also conditions where if they fixed up their theories other Marxisms would finally accept them. This general idea of, "do you want world socialism or not?" (3500 words)
	* {{b\|"[[~~redlink~~\|findings]]"}} — my attempt to summarize various working conclusions I've come to since starting the wiki; the results of applying meta-Marxism to characterize various things. (14,600 words)		* {{b\|"[[Philosophical Research:MDem/5.2r/0999 findings\|findings]]"}} — my attempt to summarize various working conclusions I've come to since starting the wiki; the results of applying meta-Marxism to characterize various things. (14,600 words)
	** In this file I stopped censoring 'those countries' because I simply got tired of it. Hopefully when it's buried far enough into this message that won't practically matter.		** In this file I stopped censoring 'those countries' because I simply got tired of it. Hopefully when it's buried far enough into this message that won't practically matter.

Line 27:		Line 27:
	</div></div>		</div></div>

	<div class="bop"><h3><time datetime="2026-03-20T19:27:25H">3-20</time></h3>		<div class="bop bottom"><h3><time datetime="2026-03-20T19:27:25H">3-20</time></h3>
	I acknowledge I may have said some stupid things about Deng Xiaoping Thought in the "findings" file or otherwise.<br/>		I acknowledge I may have said some stupid things about Deng Xiaoping Thought in the "findings" file or otherwise.<br/>
	This is why I had to actually try to stop doing all of this in an isolated room and show it to {{em\|someone}}. So it could improve. I knew that if the methods of violet Marxism were any good, despite being the one who compiled the methods, I would definitely not be at the deepest levels of understanding on any of the individual ideologies I was studying and modeling and trying to give a big-picture account of, so I probably would not actually be the best person to send out to be applying any of this. I am always in this terrible conundrum that I am the least stupid person in my area about what ideologies and historical periods are and how they work to the point I never have anyone else to ask for help on how to solve problems and yet after focusing most of my energy every day on trying to learn and synthesize things I still end up feeling like I am the worst Marxist theorist and I know nothing.		This is why I had to actually try to stop doing all of this in an isolated room and show it to {{em\|someone}}. So it could improve. I knew that if the methods of violet Marxism were any good, despite being the one who compiled the methods, I would definitely not be at the deepest levels of understanding on any of the individual ideologies I was studying and modeling and trying to give a big-picture account of, so I probably would not actually be the best person to send out to be applying any of this. I am always in this terrible conundrum that I am the least stupid person in my area about what ideologies and historical periods are and how they work to the point I never have anyone else to ask for help on how to solve problems and yet after focusing most of my energy every day on trying to learn and synthesize things I still end up feeling like I am the worst Marxist theorist and I know nothing.
	</div>		</div>

			== Footnotes ==

			# For anyone who is new to this site: no other page on this wiki normally censors "Israel" or "Palestine". That was specifically related to this being an e-mail message that could theoretically get shredded in a filter or seen over the wrong person's shoulder while at work. Not that blotting out the word fully helps with the second situation, but the instances where the words weren't even said in the sentence ("those countries") {{em\|would}} make the message harder to catch at a glance.

	<!--		<!--