Research:Properties/Numeric - Revision history

Reversedragon: Item ID, dimension, sense

2026-03-28T01:44:02Z

Item ID, dimension, sense

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:44, 28 March 2026
Line 9:		Line 9:

	{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean compound">		{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean compound">
			{{HueNumber\|PPPZ}} <!-- en: Item dimension -->
			{{HueNumber\|PPPQ}} <!-- en: Item ID [number] -->
			{{HueNumber\|PPPS}} <!-- en: sense [identifier] -->
	{{HueNumber\|PPPA}} <!-- en: alias [string] -->		{{HueNumber\|PPPA}} <!-- en: alias [string] -->
	{{HueNumber\|P3}} <!-- en: sub-case of [Item] -->		{{HueNumber\|P3}} <!-- en: sub-case of [Item] -->

Reversedragon: continuous with

2025-09-02T08:34:30Z

continuous with

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:34, 2 September 2025
Line 26:		Line 26:
	{{HueNumber\|P111}} <!-- en: Entity hex color [color] -->		{{HueNumber\|P111}} <!-- en: Entity hex color [color] -->
	{{HueNumber\|P115}} <!-- en: depicts proposition [item] -->		{{HueNumber\|P115}} <!-- en: depicts proposition [item] -->
			{{HueNumber\|P131}} <!-- en: not continuous with [Item] -->
			{{HueNumber\|P132}} <!-- en: continuous with [Item] -->
			{{HueNumber\|P133}} <!-- en: crossed over with [Item] -->
	{{HueNumber\|P134}} <!-- en: Wavebuilder: forms from [item] -->		{{HueNumber\|P134}} <!-- en: Wavebuilder: forms from [item] -->
	{{HueNumber\|P135}} <!-- en: Wavebuilder: results from [item] -->		{{HueNumber\|P135}} <!-- en: Wavebuilder: results from [item] -->
Line 176:		Line 179:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="131">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="131">??

	</li><li class="~~field_fantasy~~" value="132">not continuous with -> example: mainstream Marxism-Leninism - not continuous with - Trotskyism; Dragon Ball GT - not continuous with - Dragon Ball Super; New Testament - not continuous with - Quran		</li><li class="number_empty" value="132">(Ontology entry: not continuous with / Wavebuilder result from ...)
	</li><li class="field_fantasy" value="133">continuous with / work is continuous with / series continuous with / philosophical tradition continuous with -> serious canonicity relationship between two individual works or a work and containing series. does not immediately imply reverse relationship; if fan works are represented in Items, this should be used asymmetrically on the fan creation only. open question: should this be used for non-fiction works? I feel like the answer is yes precisely when they follow from an existing theoretical work in exactly the same way a fictional derivative work does, presuming previous works to be part of them. this allows easily coding the otherwise complex relationship that the collected works of Lenin are "canon" to Trotskyism without the faction of people immediately connected to Lenin actually approving of that. however this should not be used across the boundary between fiction and non-fiction <em>unless</em> it is meant to imply that the fictional work takes place inside a version of real-world history. sometimes this is the case. you can legitimately put some very funny inferences on the Fantastic Beasts entry although these would not belong directly on main-series Harry Potter entries.
	</li><li class="field_fantasy" value="134">crossed over with / work has crossed over with -> to both discourage and encourage that ridiculous form of fan theory creation where people take crossovers seriously for no particular reason. don't conflate this with "work is continuous with~~". <em>do</em> put all the sillier connections in here.~~

	</~~li><li class="number_empty" value="135">(Ontology entry:~~ Wavebuilder result from ...)
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="136">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="136">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="137">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="137">??

Reversedragon: not continuous with

2025-09-02T06:10:45Z

not continuous with

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:10, 2 September 2025
Line 175:		Line 175:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="130">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="130">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="131">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="131">??
	~~</li><li class="number_empty" value="132">??~~

			</li><li class="field_fantasy" value="132">not continuous with -> example: mainstream Marxism-Leninism - not continuous with - Trotskyism; Dragon Ball GT - not continuous with - Dragon Ball Super; New Testament - not continuous with - Quran
	</li><li class="field_fantasy" value="133">continuous with / work is continuous with / series continuous with / philosophical tradition continuous with -> serious canonicity relationship between two individual works or a work and containing series. does not immediately imply reverse relationship; if fan works are represented in Items, this should be used asymmetrically on the fan creation only. open question: should this be used for non-fiction works? I feel like the answer is yes precisely when they follow from an existing theoretical work in exactly the same way a fictional derivative work does, presuming previous works to be part of them. this allows easily coding the otherwise complex relationship that the collected works of Lenin are "canon" to Trotskyism without the faction of people immediately connected to Lenin actually approving of that. however this should not be used across the boundary between fiction and non-fiction <em>unless</em> it is meant to imply that the fictional work takes place inside a version of real-world history. sometimes this is the case. you can legitimately put some very funny inferences on the Fantastic Beasts entry although these would not belong directly on main-series Harry Potter entries.		</li><li class="field_fantasy" value="133">continuous with / work is continuous with / series continuous with / philosophical tradition continuous with -> serious canonicity relationship between two individual works or a work and containing series. does not immediately imply reverse relationship; if fan works are represented in Items, this should be used asymmetrically on the fan creation only. open question: should this be used for non-fiction works? I feel like the answer is yes precisely when they follow from an existing theoretical work in exactly the same way a fictional derivative work does, presuming previous works to be part of them. this allows easily coding the otherwise complex relationship that the collected works of Lenin are "canon" to Trotskyism without the faction of people immediately connected to Lenin actually approving of that. however this should not be used across the boundary between fiction and non-fiction <em>unless</em> it is meant to imply that the fictional work takes place inside a version of real-world history. sometimes this is the case. you can legitimately put some very funny inferences on the Fantastic Beasts entry although these would not belong directly on main-series Harry Potter entries.
	</li><li class="field_fantasy" value="134">work has crossed over with -> to both discourage and encourage that ridiculous form of fan theory creation where people take crossovers seriously for no particular reason. don't conflate this with "work is continuous with". <em>do</em> put all the sillier connections in here.		</li><li class="field_fantasy" value="134">crossed over with / work has crossed over with -> to both discourage and encourage that ridiculous form of fan theory creation where people take crossovers seriously for no particular reason. don't conflate this with "work is continuous with". <em>do</em> put all the sillier connections in here.

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="135">(Ontology entry: Wavebuilder result from ...)		</li><li class="number_empty" value="135">(Ontology entry: Wavebuilder result from ...)

Reversedragon: originating class

2025-09-02T06:05:27Z

originating class

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:05, 2 September 2025
Line 20:		Line 20:
	{{HueNumber\|P43}} <!-- en: polar or cubic with [item] -->		{{HueNumber\|P43}} <!-- en: polar or cubic with [item] -->
	{{HueNumber\|P56}} <!-- en: color swatch references [item] -->		{{HueNumber\|P56}} <!-- en: color swatch references [item] -->
			{{HueNumber\|P92}} <!-- en: originating class [Item] -->
	{{HueNumber\|P108}} <!-- en: at order of magnitude [item] -->		{{HueNumber\|P108}} <!-- en: at order of magnitude [item] -->
	{{HueNumber\|P109}} <!-- en: CSS property [identifier] -->		{{HueNumber\|P109}} <!-- en: CSS property [identifier] -->
Line 137:		Line 138:
	</li><li class="" value="90">work type / work serialization method / work archival method		</li><li class="" value="90">work type / work serialization method / work archival method
	</li><li class="" value="91">article DOI [identifier]		</li><li class="" value="91">article DOI [identifier]
	~~</li><li class="" value="92">edition ISBN [identifier]~~
	~~</li><li class="" value="93">external URL [URL] / wikipedia article / wiktionary entry / Fandom article - [[Philosophical Research:Properties/P60\|doc]]~~
	~~</li><li class="" value="94">citation Lexeme [wikibase-sense] -> Lexeme used to disambiguate editions, cite codes, or aliases~~

	</li><li class="number_empty">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="92">(Ontology entry: originating class)
	</li><li class="number_empty">??
			</li><li class="" value="93">edition ISBN [identifier]
			</li><li class="" value="94">external URL [URL] / wikipedia article / wiktionary entry / Fandom article - [[Philosophical Research:Properties/P60\|doc]]
			</li><li class="" value="95">citation Lexeme [wikibase-sense] -> Lexeme used to disambiguate editions, cite codes, or aliases

			</li><li class="number_empty" value="96">??
	</li><li class="" value="97">relevant quote / relevant epigram [string]		</li><li class="" value="97">relevant quote / relevant epigram [string]
	</li><li class="" value="98">summary of reference [string] / summary of link / reference summary or annotation		</li><li class="" value="98">summary of reference [string] / summary of link / reference summary or annotation

Reversedragon: abstraction rating

2025-08-23T01:54:47Z

abstraction rating

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:54, 23 August 2025
Line 222:		Line 222:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="290">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="290">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="299">(Ontology entry: communication question 99)		</li><li class="number_empty" value="299">(Ontology entry: communication question 99)

			</li><li class="field_fantasy" value="300">abstraction rating -> a set of rating questions appropriate for art, which do not rate it on a factual basis or draw value judgements about whether it being "accurate to reality" is good, and only "rate" it specifically on how close it is to being non-fiction versus how abstract it is.
	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

Reversedragon: category

2025-07-26T09:14:28Z

Reversedragon: described by pronouns

2025-07-14T05:14:42Z

described by pronouns

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:14, 14 July 2025
Line 27:		Line 27:
	{{HueNumber\|P134}} <!-- en: Wavebuilder: forms from [item] -->		{{HueNumber\|P134}} <!-- en: Wavebuilder: forms from [item] -->
	{{HueNumber\|P135}} <!-- en: Wavebuilder: results from [item] -->		{{HueNumber\|P135}} <!-- en: Wavebuilder: results from [item] -->
			{{HueNumber\|P138}} <!-- en: described by pronoun(s) [Lexeme] -->
	{{HueNumber\|P145}} <!-- en: along with [item] -->		{{HueNumber\|P145}} <!-- en: along with [item] -->
	{{HueNumber\|P146}} <!-- en: formed from Lexeme Senses [wikibase-sense] -->		{{HueNumber\|P146}} <!-- en: formed from Lexeme Senses [wikibase-sense] -->
Line 180:		Line 181:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="137">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="137">??

	<li class="~~field_exstruct~~" value="138">~~described by pronoun~~(s) / uses or described by pronoun(s) / pronoun(s) / preferred pronoun(s) -> on an entity like Mangle, just add {he, she, they} because commentators use all of them; on a character from a Japanese source or official Japanese dub, remember to add Japanese pronouns		<li class="number_empty" value="138">(Ontology entry)

	</li><li class="" value="139">associated with lesson / character associated with lesson / associated with moral / associated with philosophical statement -> Twilight Sparkle - associated with lesson - friendship; Cassidy - associated with lesson - don't hold onto life		</li><li class="" value="139">associated with lesson / character associated with lesson / associated with moral / associated with philosophical statement -> Twilight Sparkle - associated with lesson - friendship; Cassidy - associated with lesson - don't hold onto life
	</li><li class="" value="140">has origin story / character explained by story containing parallel characters -> this one is for FNaF characters, no hiding it		</li><li class="" value="140">has origin story / character explained by story containing parallel characters -> this one is for FNaF characters, no hiding it

Reversedragon: work is continuous with

2025-07-13T08:18:25Z

work is continuous with

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:18, 13 July 2025
Line 172:		Line 172:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="131">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="131">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="132">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="132">??
	</li><li class="~~number_empty~~" value="133">??
	</li><li class="~~number_empty~~" value="134">??		</li><li class="field_fantasy" value="133">continuous with / work is continuous with / series continuous with / philosophical tradition continuous with -> serious canonicity relationship between two individual works or a work and containing series. does not immediately imply reverse relationship; if fan works are represented in Items, this should be used asymmetrically on the fan creation only. open question: should this be used for non-fiction works? I feel like the answer is yes precisely when they follow from an existing theoretical work in exactly the same way a fictional derivative work does, presuming previous works to be part of them. this allows easily coding the otherwise complex relationship that the collected works of Lenin are "canon" to Trotskyism without the faction of people immediately connected to Lenin actually approving of that. however this should not be used across the boundary between fiction and non-fiction <em>unless</em> it is meant to imply that the fictional work takes place inside a version of real-world history. sometimes this is the case. you can legitimately put some very funny inferences on the Fantastic Beasts entry although these would not belong directly on main-series Harry Potter entries.
			</li><li class="field_fantasy" value="134">work has crossed over with -> to both discourage and encourage that ridiculous form of fan theory creation where people take crossovers seriously for no particular reason. don't conflate this with "work is continuous with". <em>do</em> put all the sillier connections in here.

	</li><li class="number_empty" value="135">(Ontology entry: Wavebuilder result from ...)		</li><li class="number_empty" value="135">(Ontology entry: Wavebuilder result from ...)
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="136">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="136">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="137">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="137">??

	<li class="" value="138">uses or described by pronoun(s) / pronoun(s) / preferred pronoun(s) -> on an entity like Mangle, just add {he, she, they} because commentators use all of them; on a character from a Japanese source or official Japanese dub, remember to add Japanese pronouns		<li class="field_exstruct" value="138">described by pronoun(s) / uses or described by pronoun(s) / pronoun(s) / preferred pronoun(s) -> on an entity like Mangle, just add {he, she, they} because commentators use all of them; on a character from a Japanese source or official Japanese dub, remember to add Japanese pronouns

	</li><li class="" value="139">associated with lesson / character associated with lesson / associated with moral / associated with philosophical statement -> Twilight Sparkle - associated with lesson - friendship; Cassidy - associated with lesson - don't hold onto life		</li><li class="" value="139">associated with lesson / character associated with lesson / associated with moral / associated with philosophical statement -> Twilight Sparkle - associated with lesson - friendship; Cassidy - associated with lesson - don't hold onto life
Line 220:		Line 222:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="290">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="290">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="299">(Ontology entry: communication question 99)		</li><li class="number_empty" value="299">(Ontology entry: communication question 99)

	</li><li class="field_fantasy" value="9999">[P] work is continuous with -> serious canonicity relationship between two individual works or a work and containing series. does not immediately imply reverse relationship. if fan creations are represented in Items, this should be used asymmetrically on the fan creation only. open question: should this be used for non-fiction works? I feel like the answer is yes precisely when they follow from an existing theoretical work in exactly the same way a fictional derivative work does, presuming previous works to be part of them. this allows easily coding the otherwise complex relationship that the collected works of Lenin are "canon" to Trotskyism without the faction of people immediately connected to Lenin actually approving of that. however this should not be used across the boundary between fiction and non-fiction <em>unless</em> it is meant to imply that the fictional work takes place inside a version of real-world history. sometimes this is the case. you can legitimately put some very funny inferences on the Fantastic Beasts entry although these would not belong directly on main-series Harry Potter entries.
	</li><li class="field_fantasy" value="9999">[P] work has crossed over with -> to both discourage and encourage that ridiculous form of fan theory creation where people take crossovers seriously for no particular reason. don't conflate this with "work is continuous with". do put all the sillier connections in here.

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

Reversedragon: work is continuous with - move here from Items prototype

2025-07-13T08:07:29Z

work is continuous with - move here from Items prototype

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:07, 13 July 2025
Line 220:		Line 220:
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="290">??		</li><li class="number_empty" value="290">??
	</li><li class="number_empty" value="299">(Ontology entry: communication question 99)		</li><li class="number_empty" value="299">(Ontology entry: communication question 99)

			</li><li class="field_fantasy" value="9999">[P] work is continuous with -> serious canonicity relationship between two individual works or a work and containing series. does not immediately imply reverse relationship. if fan creations are represented in Items, this should be used asymmetrically on the fan creation only. open question: should this be used for non-fiction works? I feel like the answer is yes precisely when they follow from an existing theoretical work in exactly the same way a fictional derivative work does, presuming previous works to be part of them. this allows easily coding the otherwise complex relationship that the collected works of Lenin are "canon" to Trotskyism without the faction of people immediately connected to Lenin actually approving of that. however this should not be used across the boundary between fiction and non-fiction <em>unless</em> it is meant to imply that the fictional work takes place inside a version of real-world history. sometimes this is the case. you can legitimately put some very funny inferences on the Fantastic Beasts entry although these would not belong directly on main-series Harry Potter entries.
			</li><li class="field_fantasy" value="9999">[P] work has crossed over with -> to both discourage and encourage that ridiculous form of fan theory creation where people take crossovers seriously for no particular reason. don't conflate this with "work is continuous with". do put all the sillier connections in here.

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

Reversedragon: appears in work

2025-06-26T12:01:04Z

appears in work

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:01, 26 June 2025
Line 14:		Line 14:
	{{HueNumber\|P5}} <!-- en: super-case of [Item] -->		{{HueNumber\|P5}} <!-- en: super-case of [Item] -->
	{{HueNumber\|P6}} <!-- en: consists of components [item] -->		{{HueNumber\|P6}} <!-- en: consists of components [item] -->
			{{HueNumber\|P14}} <!-- en: appears in work [item] restore Property data -->
	{{HueNumber\|P34}} <!-- en: applies within framework [item] -->		{{HueNumber\|P34}} <!-- en: applies within framework [item] -->
	{{HueNumber\|P35}} <!-- en: focuses on [item] -->		{{HueNumber\|P35}} <!-- en: focuses on [item] -->
Line 55:		Line 56:
	</li><li class="" value="12">[[Property:P12\|part of historical period or fictional work]] [item] - [[Philosophical Research:Properties/P9\|doc]]		</li><li class="" value="12">[[Property:P12\|part of historical period or fictional work]] [item] - [[Philosophical Research:Properties/P9\|doc]]
	</li><li value="13">[[Property:P13\|Rock-Paper-Scissors weakness]] [item]		</li><li value="13">[[Property:P13\|Rock-Paper-Scissors weakness]] [item]
	</li><li class="" value="14">~~[[Property~~:~~P14\|~~appears in work~~]] [item]~~		</li><li class="number_empty" value="14">(Ontology entry: appears in work ...)
	</li><li class="" value="15">[[Property:P15\|work depicts or contains]] [item]		</li><li class="" value="15">[[Property:P15\|work depicts or contains]] [item]
	</li><li class="" value="16">[[Property:P16\|adapted from signifier]] [item]		</li><li class="" value="16">[[Property:P16\|adapted from signifier]] [item]

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:44, 28 March 2026
Line 9:		Line 9:

	{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean compound">		{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean compound">
			{{HueNumber\|PPPZ}} <!-- en: Item dimension -->
			{{HueNumber\|PPPQ}} <!-- en: Item ID [number] -->
			{{HueNumber\|PPPS}} <!-- en: sense [identifier] -->
	{{HueNumber\|PPPA}} <!-- en: alias [string] -->		{{HueNumber\|PPPA}} <!-- en: alias [string] -->
	{{HueNumber\|P3}} <!-- en: sub-case of [Item] -->		{{HueNumber\|P3}} <!-- en: sub-case of [Item] -->

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:14, 26 July 2025
Line 244:		Line 244:
	\|}		\|}

	[[Category:Ontology tools]]		[[Category:Current proposals]] [[Category:Ontology tools]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:01, 26 June 2025
Line 14:		Line 14:
	{{HueNumber\|P5}} <!-- en: super-case of [Item] -->		{{HueNumber\|P5}} <!-- en: super-case of [Item] -->
	{{HueNumber\|P6}} <!-- en: consists of components [item] -->		{{HueNumber\|P6}} <!-- en: consists of components [item] -->
			{{HueNumber\|P14}} <!-- en: appears in work [item] restore Property data -->
	{{HueNumber\|P34}} <!-- en: applies within framework [item] -->		{{HueNumber\|P34}} <!-- en: applies within framework [item] -->
	{{HueNumber\|P35}} <!-- en: focuses on [item] -->		{{HueNumber\|P35}} <!-- en: focuses on [item] -->
Line 55:		Line 56:
	</li><li class="" value="12">[[Property:P12\|part of historical period or fictional work]] [item] - [[Philosophical Research:Properties/P9\|doc]]		</li><li class="" value="12">[[Property:P12\|part of historical period or fictional work]] [item] - [[Philosophical Research:Properties/P9\|doc]]
	</li><li value="13">[[Property:P13\|Rock-Paper-Scissors weakness]] [item]		</li><li value="13">[[Property:P13\|Rock-Paper-Scissors weakness]] [item]
	</li><li class="" value="14">~~[[Property~~:~~P14\|~~appears in work~~]] [item]~~		</li><li class="number_empty" value="14">(Ontology entry: appears in work ...)
	</li><li class="" value="15">[[Property:P15\|work depicts or contains]] [item]		</li><li class="" value="15">[[Property:P15\|work depicts or contains]] [item]
	</li><li class="" value="16">[[Property:P16\|adapted from signifier]] [item]		</li><li class="" value="16">[[Property:P16\|adapted from signifier]] [item]