User:RD/9k/Q11,88 - Revision history

Reversedragon: going back in time to stop Trotsky

2026-04-04T04:42:29Z

going back in time to stop Trotsky

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:42, 4 April 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~<!--~~ == ~~Ontology~~ entry ==		{{NextNineThousand\|PPPA=going back in time to kill Hitler\|User=RD\|E=Q11,88\|Contents=y}}
	{{~~HueNumberPreview\|E=Q11,88~~}}		== Main entry ==
			{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean">

	~~-->~~== ~~Main entry~~ ==		{{li\|start=y\|I=S1/ES\|Q=11,88\|Q2=1188}}going back in time to kill Hitler -> this is blue because of the weird amount of framings that this is actually bad. when normal people judge everything based on ethics as the ultimate rubric and treat the violation of specific ethical principles as something that's an inherently obvious reason not to do or believe something, and Nazi Germany invading other continents is one of the worst ethical outcomes there could be, this baffles me. this is one of the most [[:Category:Existentialist-Structuralist tradition ontology\|Existentialist]] things you could say.

	~~<noinclude>~~{{~~HueCSS~~}}</~~noinclude~~><ol ~~start~~=~~"1000"~~ class="hue clean">		{{li\|I=S1/ML\|Q=11,88\|Q2=1188}}though. okay. it's time for a little dark genius. if it's the case it could hypothetically be bad to go back in time and prevent Nazi Germany, then it could hypothetically be bad to go back and prevent the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. that could hypothetically lead to a much worse outcome. hypothetically! most people don't think about that implication. it could hypothetically be bad to go back and prevent the rise of the Communist Party of China. which also means it could hypothetically be bad to destroy the Communist Party of China today, because [[E:History is made of processes\|the process of preventing it and the process of destroying it today would be similar]].<br />
			now what does that say about the people who think it could be bad to prevent Nazi Germany?

			</li></ol>

			== Time travel as relativity ==
			<ol class="hue clean">

	<li ~~class~~=~~"field_exstruct" data-qid~~=~~"11,88" value~~=~~"1188" data-dimension~~=~~"S">~~going back in time to kill Hitler -> this is blue because of the weird amount of framings that this is actually bad. when normal people judge everything based on ethics as the ultimate rubric and treat the violation of specific ethical principles as something that's an inherently obvious reason not to do or believe something, and Nazi Germany invading other continents is one of the worst ethical outcomes there could be, this baffles me. this is one of the most [[:Category:Existentialist-Structuralist tradition ontology\|Existentialist]] things you could say.		{{li\|start=y\|I=S2/IV\|Q=618}}going back in time to stop Stalin
			{{li\|I=S2/ML\|Q=618}}going back in time to stop Trotsky

	</li~~><li class~~=~~"field_ML" data-qid~~=~~"11~~,~~88" value=~~"~~1188" data-dimension="S">though. okay. it's time for a little dark genius. if it's the case it could hypothetically be bad to go~~ back in time ~~and prevent Nazi Germany, then it~~ could ~~hypothetically~~ be ~~bad~~ to ~~go back~~ and ~~prevent the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. that could hypothetically lead to~~ a ~~much worse outcome. hypothetically! most people don~~'~~t think~~ about ~~that implication.~~ it ~~could hypothetically be bad to go back and prevent~~ the ~~rise of the Communist Party of China.~~ which ~~also means it could hypothetically be bad to destroy the Communist Party of China today, because [[E:History is made of processes\|the process of preventing it~~ and ~~the process of destroying it today would be similar]].<br />~~		{{li\|I=S2/ML\|Q=618}}The past history of revolutions is merely the present process of revolutions going through its first or second repetitions / In concept, "going back in time to stop Stalin or Trotsky" could literally just be teleporting to a different country that exists today and looking at a present-day revolution early before you'd otherwise hear about it; the past is merely an event which has not completed and crossed (for example) from Alpha Centauri to earth 4 years after completing
	~~now what does that say about the people who think it could be bad~~ to ~~prevent Nazi Germany?~~

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>
Line 23:		Line 30:


	[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]] ~~{{NextNineThousand\|PPPA=going back in time to kill Hitler\|User=RD\|E=Q11,88}}~~ <!-- page ends here. TTS-unfriendly numbers incoming		[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]] <!-- page ends here. TTS-unfriendly numbers incoming
	redirects: [[User:RD/9k/Q1188]]		redirects: [[User:RD/9k/Q1188]]
	duplication hint: copy markup from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN\|9k/Q11,88]] -->		duplication hint: copy markup from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN\|9k/Q11,88]] -->

Reversedragon: no Bauplan analysis on this entry. oops.

2026-01-22T12:56:36Z

no Bauplan analysis on this entry. oops.

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:56, 22 January 2026
Line 13:		Line 13:
	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

	== ~~Bauplan analysis~~ ==		== Related ==<!--

	<ol class="hue clean">		<ol class="hue clean">
	</li></ol>		</li></ol> -->

	== Ideology codes ==		== Ideology codes ==

Reversedragon: Reversedragon moved page User:RD/9k/Q1188 to User:RD/9k/Q11,88: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title

2026-01-22T12:35:14Z

Reversedragon moved page User:RD/9k/Q1188 to User:RD/9k/Q11,88: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title

← Older revision	Revision as of 12:35, 22 January 2026
(No difference)

Reversedragon: copy markup from 9k/Q59,91

2026-01-22T12:34:58Z

copy markup from 9k/Q59,91

New page

== Main entry ==

<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol start="1000" class="hue clean">

<li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="11,88" value="1188" data-dimension="S">going back in time to kill Hitler -> this is blue because of the weird amount of framings that this is actually bad. when normal people judge everything based on ethics as the ultimate rubric and treat the violation of specific ethical principles as something that's an inherently obvious reason not to do or believe something, and Nazi Germany invading other continents is one of the worst ethical outcomes there could be, this baffles me. this is one of the most [[:Category:Existentialist-Structuralist tradition ontology|Existentialist]] things you could say.

</li><li class="field_ML" data-qid="11,88" value="1188" data-dimension="S">though. okay. it's time for a little dark genius. if it's the case it could hypothetically be bad to go back in time and prevent Nazi Germany, then it could hypothetically be bad to go back and prevent the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. that could hypothetically lead to a much worse outcome. hypothetically! most people don't think about that implication. it could hypothetically be bad to go back and prevent the rise of the Communist Party of China. which also means it could hypothetically be bad to destroy the Communist Party of China today, because [[E:History is made of processes|the process of preventing it and the process of destroying it today would be similar]].<br />
now what does that say about the people who think it could be bad to prevent Nazi Germany?

</li></ol>

== Bauplan analysis ==

<ol class="hue clean">
</li></ol>

== Ideology codes ==

* (none)

[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]] {{NextNineThousand|PPPA=going back in time to kill Hitler|User=RD|E=Q11,88}}