User:RD/9k/Q22,23 - Revision history

Reversedragon: formatting

2026-02-28T04:54:19Z

formatting

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:54, 28 February 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">		<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">

	</~~li><li class~~=~~"field_mdem" value~~="2223~~" data-dimension~~=~~"S2">~~[[Ontology:Q2223\|Nature is a multiplication table]] / All physics equations are actually multivariable functions -> here we go. one of the most genuinely solid propositions I've come to in <cite>MDem</cite>, that unlike everything else I have very little doubt about, and high confidence in. we teach mathematics and Newtonian mechanics entirely wrong. we should be teaching every physics function from wavefunction collapse to chemical reactions to throwing a rock as multivariable functions of objects colliding in the sense of two number lines colliding in a multiplication table style function to produce a three dimensional graph. this is the beginning to how we fix all of physics. this might lead to unifying quantum mechanics, Newtonian mechanics, and gravity. this is it. it sounds absurdly simple, and ridiculous that this could be the answer, but I think this is it.		{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=22,23\|Q2=2223\| h4 = [[Ontology:Q2223\|Nature is a multiplication table]] }} / All physics equations are actually multivariable functions -> here we go. one of the most genuinely solid propositions I've come to in <cite>MDem</cite>, that unlike everything else I have very little doubt about, and high confidence in. we teach mathematics and Newtonian mechanics entirely wrong. we should be teaching every physics function from wavefunction collapse to chemical reactions to throwing a rock as multivariable functions of objects colliding in the sense of two number lines colliding in a multiplication table style function to produce a three dimensional graph. this is the beginning to how we fix all of physics. this might lead to unifying quantum mechanics, Newtonian mechanics, and gravity. this is it. it sounds absurdly simple, and ridiculous that this could be the answer, but I think this is it.

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

	== ~~Wave machines~~ ==		== Related ==

	<ol class="hue clean">		<ol class="hue clean">

	</~~li><li class~~=~~"field_mdem" value~~="2224~~" data-dimension~~=~~"S2">~~Punnett squares can apply to anything -> the claim that Punnett squares are just one situational application of a data structure or kind of computation that can be used to model any event with multiple known outcomes		{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=22,24\|Q2=2224\| h4 = Punnett squares can apply to anything }} -> the claim that Punnett squares are just one situational application of a data structure or kind of computation that can be used to model any event with multiple known outcomes

	~~</li></ol>~~		{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=21,93\|Q2=2193\| h4 = A contradiction has the form f(x,y) {{=}} z }} / A contradiction is a process of form f(x,y) = z / A contradiction is a physical process in which two separate free-floating objects which may lack the ability to directly read or predict each other interact, with the general form f(x,y) = z -> many people claim that dialectical materialism is "arbitrary" or "mystical" just because they themselves don't understand what a contradiction is. I'm tired of this. it's possible to fix this and make all the opaque language super-precise so there are no Confusing Words to argue over any more, and if by the time it all turns into mathematics you think it's too difficult to understand, well it's your fault then, because you were the one that had trouble with Words.

	~~== Dialectical materialism ==~~

	~~<ol class="hue clean">~~

	{{li\|I=S2/MX\|Q=21,93\|Q2=2193}}A contradiction is a process of form f(x,y) = z / A contradiction is a physical process in which two separate free-floating objects which may lack the ability to directly read or predict each other interact, with the general form f(x,y) = z -> many people claim that dialectical materialism is "arbitrary" or "mystical" just because they themselves don't understand what a contradiction is. I'm tired of this. it's possible to fix this and make all the opaque language super-precise so there are no Confusing Words to argue over any more, and if by the time it all turns into mathematics you think it's too difficult to understand, well it's your fault then, because you were the one that had trouble with Words.

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

Reversedragon: Reversedragon moved page User:RD/9k/Q2223 to User:RD/9k/Q22,23: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title

2026-02-28T04:47:32Z

Reversedragon moved page User:RD/9k/Q2223 to User:RD/9k/Q22,23: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title

← Older revision	Revision as of 04:47, 28 February 2026
(No difference)

Reversedragon: copy markup from 9k/Q22,23

2026-02-28T04:47:20Z

copy markup from 9k/Q22,23

New page

{{NextNineThousand|PPPA=Nature is a multiplication table|User=RD|E=Q22,23|Contents=y}}
== Main entry ==
<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">

</li><li class="field_mdem" value="2223" data-dimension="S2">[[Ontology:Q2223|Nature is a multiplication table]] / All physics equations are actually multivariable functions -> here we go. one of the most genuinely solid propositions I've come to in <cite>MDem</cite>, that unlike everything else I have very little doubt about, and high confidence in. we teach mathematics and Newtonian mechanics entirely wrong. we should be teaching every physics function from wavefunction collapse to chemical reactions to throwing a rock as multivariable functions of objects colliding in the sense of two number lines colliding in a multiplication table style function to produce a three dimensional graph. this is the beginning to how we fix all of physics. this might lead to unifying quantum mechanics, Newtonian mechanics, and gravity. this is it. it sounds absurdly simple, and ridiculous that this could be the answer, but I think this is it.

</li></ol>

== Wave machines ==

<ol class="hue clean">

</li><li class="field_mdem" value="2224" data-dimension="S2">Punnett squares can apply to anything -> the claim that Punnett squares are just one situational application of a data structure or kind of computation that can be used to model any event with multiple known outcomes

</li></ol>

== Dialectical materialism ==

<ol class="hue clean">

{{li|I=S2/MX|Q=21,93|Q2=2193}}A contradiction is a process of form f(x,y) = z / A contradiction is a physical process in which two separate free-floating objects which may lack the ability to directly read or predict each other interact, with the general form f(x,y) = z -> many people claim that dialectical materialism is "arbitrary" or "mystical" just because they themselves don't understand what a contradiction is. I'm tired of this. it's possible to fix this and make all the opaque language super-precise so there are no Confusing Words to argue over any more, and if by the time it all turns into mathematics you think it's too difficult to understand, well it's your fault then, because you were the one that had trouble with Words.

</li></ol>

== Ideology codes ==

* (none)

[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]]