User:RD/9k/Q28,98 - Revision history

Reversedragon: numbers / redirects

2026-02-13T07:42:55Z

numbers / redirects

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:42, 13 February 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{NextNineThousand\|PPPA=~~R.D. bad at~~ meta-Marxism\|User=RD\|E=Q28,79\|NoContents=y}}		{{NextNineThousand\|PPPA=meta-Marxism is a concept\|User=RD\|E=Q28,98\|NoContents=y}}
	== Main entries ==		== Main entries ==
	<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">		<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">
Line 25:		Line 25:

	[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]] <!-- page ends here. TTS-unfriendly numbers incoming		[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]] <!-- page ends here. TTS-unfriendly numbers incoming
	redirects: [[User:RD/9k/Q2879]]		redirects: [[User:RD/9k/Q2879]] [[User:RD/9k/Q2898]] [[User:RD/9k/Q28,79]]
	duplication hint: copy markup from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN\|9k/Q28,79]] -->		duplication hint: copy markup from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN\|9k/Q28,98]] -->

Reversedragon: Reversedragon moved page User:RD/9k/Q28,79 to User:RD/9k/Q28,98: Entity better represents list of entities

2026-02-13T07:40:28Z

Reversedragon moved page User:RD/9k/Q28,79 to User:RD/9k/Q28,98: Entity better represents list of entities

← Older revision	Revision as of 07:40, 13 February 2026
(No difference)

Reversedragon: move to 28,79 so another proposition can have the coveted "91" / formatting

2026-02-13T07:37:25Z

move to 28,79 so another proposition can have the coveted "91" / formatting

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:37, 13 February 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{NextNineThousand\|PPPA=R.D. bad at meta-Marxism\|User=RD\|E=Q28,79\|NoContents=y}}		{{NextNineThousand\|PPPA=R.D. bad at meta-Marxism\|User=RD\|E=Q28,79\|NoContents=y}}
	== Main ~~entry~~ ==		== Main entries ==
	<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">		<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">

	<li class="field_mdem" data-qid="28,91" value="2891" data-remark="91: Bolshevism is over" data-dimension="S2" data-submitter="R.D.">R.D. has not done meta-Marxism correctly -> pre-emptively creating this so nobody can collapse Q28,98 into being false specifically because <em>R.D. has not allowed</em> meta-Marxism to expand to the point it can practically be more than one person. to falsify Q28,98 you have to prove something which does not pivot around R.D., like that meta-Marxism can never become a science, or can never serve the purposes of being a predictive or explanatory model that it is trying to achieve.		<li class="field_mdem" data-qid="28,98" value="2898" data-dimension="S2" data-submitter="R.D."><h4>meta-Marxism is a concept, not a person</h4> / meta-Marxism is an ontology, not a person / [[User:Reversedragon\|R.D.]] is not the only one who can do meta-Marxism -> some people are going to need this reminder. meta-Marxism is a pile of hypotheses and a scientific method (in prototype, at least) by which the hypotheses can self-correct and evolve. the meta-Marxism that adjusts itself to match reality is meta-Marxism.<br/>
			if R.D. doesn't update meta-Marxism to be empirically accurate, then R.D. is not a top-tier meta-Marxist. meta-Marxism is an embryonic attempt to create a field of science. one could say this about the original Marxism as well. one could also claim, to varying degrees of success, that Marxism never became a science and always fell back down into the realm of philosophy. that's where meta-Marxism is right now, but if it is successful, it and Marxism will both climb out of the philosophy pit together.</li>
			<!-- mediawiki parser or browser bug inserts a big gap here if you don't close the tag properly -->

			<li class="field_mdem" data-qid="28,91" value="2891" data-tradition="MX onto MX" data-remark="91: Bolshevism is over" data-dimension="S2" data-submitter="R.D."><h4>R.D. has not done meta-Marxism correctly</h4> -> pre-emptively creating this so nobody can collapse Q28,98 into being false specifically because <em>R.D. has not allowed</em> meta-Marxism to expand to the point it can practically be more than one person. to falsify Q28,98 you have to prove something which does not pivot around R.D., like that meta-Marxism can never become a science, or can never serve the purposes of being a predictive or explanatory model that it is trying to achieve.

			</li><li class="field_mdem" data-qid="28,79" value="2879" data-dimension="S2">R.D. has not done meta-Marxism correctly -> move to 28,79 so [[E:Societies operates as one\|another proposition]] can have the coveted "91"

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

	== Related ==		== Related ==<!--

	<ol class="hue clean">		<ol class="hue clean">

	<~~li class="field_mdem" data-qid="28,98" value="2898" data-dimension="S2" data-submitter="R.D.">meta-Marxism is a concept, not a person~~ / ~~meta-Marxism is an ontology, not a person / [[User:Reversedragon\|R.D.]] is not the only one who can do meta-Marxism -~~> ~~some people are going to need this reminder. meta~~-~~Marxism is a pile of hypotheses and a scientific method (in prototype, at least) by which the hypotheses can self~~-correct and evolve. the meta-Marxism that adjusts itself to match reality is meta-Marxism. if R.D. doesn't update meta-Marxism to be empirically accurate, then R.D. is not a top-tier meta-Marxist. meta-Marxism is an embryonic attempt to create a field of science. one could say this about the original Marxism as well. one could also claim, to varying degrees of success, that Marxism never became a science and always fell back down into the realm of philosophy. that's where meta-Marxism is right now, but if it is successful, it and Marxism will both climb out of the philosophy pit together.		</ol>-->

	~~</li></ol~~>

	== Ideology codes ==		== Ideology codes ==

	* ~~(none)~~		* MX onto MX

Reversedragon: Reversedragon moved page User:RD/9k/Q2879 to User:RD/9k/Q28,79: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title

2026-02-13T07:22:07Z

Reversedragon moved page User:RD/9k/Q2879 to User:RD/9k/Q28,79: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title

← Older revision	Revision as of 07:22, 13 February 2026
(No difference)

Reversedragon: copy markup from 9k/Q28,94

2026-02-13T07:21:52Z

copy markup from 9k/Q28,94

New page

{{NextNineThousand|PPPA=R.D. bad at meta-Marxism|User=RD|E=Q28,79|NoContents=y}}
== Main entry ==
<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">

<li class="field_mdem" data-qid="28,91" value="2891" data-remark="91: Bolshevism is over" data-dimension="S2" data-submitter="R.D.">R.D. has not done meta-Marxism correctly -> pre-emptively creating this so nobody can collapse Q28,98 into being false specifically because <em>R.D. has not allowed</em> meta-Marxism to expand to the point it can practically be more than one person. to falsify Q28,98 you have to prove something which does not pivot around R.D., like that meta-Marxism can never become a science, or can never serve the purposes of being a predictive or explanatory model that it is trying to achieve.

</li></ol>

== Related ==

<ol class="hue clean">

<li class="field_mdem" data-qid="28,98" value="2898" data-dimension="S2" data-submitter="R.D.">meta-Marxism is a concept, not a person / meta-Marxism is an ontology, not a person / [[User:Reversedragon|R.D.]] is not the only one who can do meta-Marxism -> some people are going to need this reminder. meta-Marxism is a pile of hypotheses and a scientific method (in prototype, at least) by which the hypotheses can self-correct and evolve. the meta-Marxism that adjusts itself to match reality is meta-Marxism. if R.D. doesn't update meta-Marxism to be empirically accurate, then R.D. is not a top-tier meta-Marxist. meta-Marxism is an embryonic attempt to create a field of science. one could say this about the original Marxism as well. one could also claim, to varying degrees of success, that Marxism never became a science and always fell back down into the realm of philosophy. that's where meta-Marxism is right now, but if it is successful, it and Marxism will both climb out of the philosophy pit together.

</li></ol>

== Ideology codes ==

* (none)

[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]]