User:RD/9k/Q29,20 - Revision history

Reversedragon: higher algebra / marketist mode of production

2026-03-04T23:14:52Z

higher algebra / marketist mode of production

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:14, 4 March 2026
Line 8:		Line 8:
	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

	== ~~Related~~ ==		== Numbered indexes and Liberalism ==

	<ol class="hue clean">		<ol class="hue clean">
Line 28:		Line 28:
	<li class="field_anarchy" data-tradition="A" value="618" data-dimension="S2">[[E:Q60,72\|Fan theories should be atomic thoughts]] / Fan theories should be atomic propositions / Fans don't like hour-long theories because they don't have enough spaces for choices and thus they aren't Freedom; single propositions are more agreeable because it is easier to free-associate onto one or the other and take or leave them -> I have never heard an anarchist say this out loud, but I do know the recurring patterns I see written all over everything.<br/>		<li class="field_anarchy" data-tradition="A" value="618" data-dimension="S2">[[E:Q60,72\|Fan theories should be atomic thoughts]] / Fan theories should be atomic propositions / Fans don't like hour-long theories because they don't have enough spaces for choices and thus they aren't Freedom; single propositions are more agreeable because it is easier to free-associate onto one or the other and take or leave them -> I have never heard an anarchist say this out loud, but I do know the recurring patterns I see written all over everything.<br/>
	this.... probably partly explains the appeal of Pokémon. the potential of free association around individual Pokémon stages and the (partial) lack of a single narrative. it may be terribly obvious to anybody not playing the games that they're linear and repetitive, meaning there's a narrative there, but to anyone still playing them, it would be more "obvious" to "notice" the ability to constantly make choices and do something different.		this.... probably partly explains the appeal of Pokémon. the potential of free association around individual Pokémon stages and the (partial) lack of a single narrative. it may be terribly obvious to anybody not playing the games that they're linear and repetitive, meaning there's a narrative there, but to anyone still playing them, it would be more "obvious" to "notice" the ability to constantly make choices and do something different.

			</li></ol>

			== Related ==

			<ol class="hue clean">

			<li class="field_geo" data-qid="618" value="618" data-dimension="S0">data structure (programming) / data structure (computer chips)

			<li class="field_geo" data-qid="618" value="618" data-dimension="S1">higher algebra [https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/higher+algebra] -> the study of mathematical data structures and generalizations of things such as sets, vectors, and matrices.

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>
Line 38:		Line 48:

	* STM / data structures		* STM / data structures
			* STM / higher algebra
	* MX / meta-ontology		* MX / meta-ontology
	* LR / Liberal-republicanism		* LR / Liberal-republicanism
			* ES / marketist mode of production
	* A / anarculture		* A / anarculture

Reversedragon: Anything which can be packaged up and sold as a self-contained product is inherently objective

2026-03-04T23:07:55Z

Anything which can be packaged up and sold as a self-contained product is inherently objective

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:07, 4 March 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">		<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">

	<li class="field_geo" data-qid="29,20" value="2920" data-dimension="S2">[[Ontology:Q2920\|Finite packaging facilitates gaining attention]] -> pokémon. scp reports. vines. video essays. books. perhaps even propositions. I hope chopping all philosophy into atomic propositions is the thing that works to get people actually thinking.		<li class="field_geo" data-qid="29,20" value="2920" data-dimension="S2">[[Ontology:Q2920\|Finite packaging gains attention]] / Finite packaging facilitates gaining attention -> pokémon. scp reports. vines. video essays. books. perhaps even propositions. I hope chopping all philosophy into atomic propositions is the thing that works to get people actually thinking.
	</li><li class="field_mdem" data-qid="29,20" value="2920" data-dimension="S2">~~[[Ontology:Q2920\|~~Finite packaging ~~facilitates gaining~~ attention]] -> this probably makes as much sense to be violet		</li><li class="field_mdem" data-qid="29,20" value="2920" data-dimension="S2">Finite packaging gains attention -> this probably makes as much sense to be violet

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>
Line 15:		Line 15:

	</li><li class="field_mdem" data-qid="29,27" value="2927" data-dimension="S2">Bibles are appealing because they number propositions / Biblical verses and proverbs are just numbered propositions / The way to create a "Communist bible" that people far and wide can easily reference has little to do with compilation into a book and is simply to take a lot of propositions and number them / Science can learn from the bible by numbering propositions in order to keep track of standing versus rejected hypotheses		</li><li class="field_mdem" data-qid="29,27" value="2927" data-dimension="S2">Bibles are appealing because they number propositions / Biblical verses and proverbs are just numbered propositions / The way to create a "Communist bible" that people far and wide can easily reference has little to do with compilation into a book and is simply to take a lot of propositions and number them / Science can learn from the bible by numbering propositions in order to keep track of standing versus rejected hypotheses

			{{li\|I=F2/ES\|tradition=ES, DG\|Q=618}}Anything which can be packaged up and sold as a self-contained product is inherently objective; something is objective because it can be sold for money to further Lived Experiences that ostensibly make a connection to it only out of Free Will and Freedom, and not because it accurately describes several biased subjects each stuck within material objects (physical human bodies, or larger groups of people in particular arrangements) without taking any of their individual perspectives specifically; something is objective when it takes all individual biased perspectives at once without criticizing any of them -> this is the fallacy which kept coming in with all early attempts to criticise Marxism, and to a lesser extent with Althusser's failed attempt at creating meta-Marxism.<br/>
			I swear this is why people think gigantic media series like Pokémon inherently serve the people that keep buying them, and why people think Liberal-republicanism is at all functional.<br/>
			on a different note, I've basically created this propositions project as the world's last-ditch effort to hijack people's bias toward self-contained products as "objective" just because they're self-contained, and turn that around into a way to steer people to appreciate the statements that actually are correct

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

Reversedragon: Fan theories should be atomic thoughts

2026-02-12T07:34:13Z

Fan theories should be atomic thoughts

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:34, 12 February 2026
Line 22:		Line 22:
	<ol class="hue clean">		<ol class="hue clean">

	<li class="field_anarchy" data-tradition="A" value="618" data-dimension="S2">Fans don't like hour-long theories because they don't have enough spaces for choices and thus they aren't Freedom; single propositions are more agreeable because it is easier to free-associate onto one or the other and take or leave them -> I have never heard an anarchist say this out loud, but I do know the recurring patterns I see written all over everything.<br/>		<li class="field_anarchy" data-tradition="A" value="618" data-dimension="S2">[[E:Q60,72\|Fan theories should be atomic thoughts]] / Fan theories should be atomic propositions / Fans don't like hour-long theories because they don't have enough spaces for choices and thus they aren't Freedom; single propositions are more agreeable because it is easier to free-associate onto one or the other and take or leave them -> I have never heard an anarchist say this out loud, but I do know the recurring patterns I see written all over everything.<br/>
	this.... probably partly explains the appeal of Pokémon. the potential of free association around individual Pokémon stages and the (partial) lack of a single narrative. it may be terribly obvious to anybody not playing the games that they're linear and repetitive, meaning there's a narrative there, but to anyone still playing them, it would be more "obvious" to "notice" the ability to constantly make choices and do something different.		this.... probably partly explains the appeal of Pokémon. the potential of free association around individual Pokémon stages and the (partial) lack of a single narrative. it may be terribly obvious to anybody not playing the games that they're linear and repetitive, meaning there's a narrative there, but to anyone still playing them, it would be more "obvious" to "notice" the ability to constantly make choices and do something different.

Reversedragon: /* In fandoms */ hour-long theories

2026-02-12T05:20:50Z

In fandoms: hour-long theories

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:20, 12 February 2026
Line 23:		Line 23:

	<li class="field_anarchy" data-tradition="A" value="618" data-dimension="S2">Fans don't like hour-long theories because they don't have enough spaces for choices and thus they aren't Freedom; single propositions are more agreeable because it is easier to free-associate onto one or the other and take or leave them -> I have never heard an anarchist say this out loud, but I do know the recurring patterns I see written all over everything.<br/>		<li class="field_anarchy" data-tradition="A" value="618" data-dimension="S2">Fans don't like hour-long theories because they don't have enough spaces for choices and thus they aren't Freedom; single propositions are more agreeable because it is easier to free-associate onto one or the other and take or leave them -> I have never heard an anarchist say this out loud, but I do know the recurring patterns I see written all over everything.<br/>
	this.... probably partly explains the appeal of Pokémon. the potential of free association around individual Pokémon stages and the (partial) lack of a single narrative.		this.... probably partly explains the appeal of Pokémon. the potential of free association around individual Pokémon stages and the (partial) lack of a single narrative. it may be terribly obvious to anybody not playing the games that they're linear and repetitive, meaning there's a narrative there, but to anyone still playing them, it would be more "obvious" to "notice" the ability to constantly make choices and do something different.

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

Reversedragon: hour-long theories versus single propositions

2026-02-12T05:18:05Z

hour-long theories versus single propositions

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:18, 12 February 2026
Line 4:		Line 4:

	<li class="field_geo" data-qid="29,20" value="2920" data-dimension="S2">[[Ontology:Q2920\|Finite packaging facilitates gaining attention]] -> pokémon. scp reports. vines. video essays. books. perhaps even propositions. I hope chopping all philosophy into atomic propositions is the thing that works to get people actually thinking.		<li class="field_geo" data-qid="29,20" value="2920" data-dimension="S2">[[Ontology:Q2920\|Finite packaging facilitates gaining attention]] -> pokémon. scp reports. vines. video essays. books. perhaps even propositions. I hope chopping all philosophy into atomic propositions is the thing that works to get people actually thinking.
			</li><li class="field_mdem" data-qid="29,20" value="2920" data-dimension="S2">[[Ontology:Q2920\|Finite packaging facilitates gaining attention]] -> this probably makes as much sense to be violet

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>
Line 15:		Line 16:
	</li><li class="field_mdem" data-qid="29,27" value="2927" data-dimension="S2">Bibles are appealing because they number propositions / Biblical verses and proverbs are just numbered propositions / The way to create a "Communist bible" that people far and wide can easily reference has little to do with compilation into a book and is simply to take a lot of propositions and number them / Science can learn from the bible by numbering propositions in order to keep track of standing versus rejected hypotheses		</li><li class="field_mdem" data-qid="29,27" value="2927" data-dimension="S2">Bibles are appealing because they number propositions / Biblical verses and proverbs are just numbered propositions / The way to create a "Communist bible" that people far and wide can easily reference has little to do with compilation into a book and is simply to take a lot of propositions and number them / Science can learn from the bible by numbering propositions in order to keep track of standing versus rejected hypotheses

			</li></ol>

			== In fandoms ==

			<ol class="hue clean">

			<li class="field_anarchy" data-tradition="A" value="618" data-dimension="S2">Fans don't like hour-long theories because they don't have enough spaces for choices and thus they aren't Freedom; single propositions are more agreeable because it is easier to free-associate onto one or the other and take or leave them -> I have never heard an anarchist say this out loud, but I do know the recurring patterns I see written all over everything.<br/>
			this.... probably partly explains the appeal of Pokémon. the potential of free association around individual Pokémon stages and the (partial) lack of a single narrative.
	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

Line 23:		Line 32:
	</ol>		</ol>

	* ~~(none)~~		* STM / data structures
			* MX / meta-ontology
			* LR / Liberal-republicanism
			* A / anarculture

Reversedragon: Reversedragon moved page User:RD/9k/Q2920 to User:RD/9k/Q29,20: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title

2026-02-10T23:31:11Z

Reversedragon moved page User:RD/9k/Q2920 to User:RD/9k/Q29,20: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title

← Older revision	Revision as of 23:31, 10 February 2026
(No difference)

Reversedragon: copy markup from 9k/Q920

2026-02-10T23:30:55Z

copy markup from 9k/Q920

New page

{{NextNineThousand|PPPA=Finite packaging gains attention|User=RD|E=Q29,20|Contents=y}}
== Main entry ==
<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">

<li class="field_geo" data-qid="29,20" value="2920" data-dimension="S2">[[Ontology:Q2920|Finite packaging facilitates gaining attention]] -> pokémon. scp reports. vines. video essays. books. perhaps even propositions. I hope chopping all philosophy into atomic propositions is the thing that works to get people actually thinking.

</li></ol>

== Related ==

<ol class="hue clean">

<li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="30,89" value="3089" data-dimension="S2">Propositions appeal to Liberal-republicans / Proposition-based logic appeals to Liberal-republicans / Propositional logic is appealing to center-Liberals — anarchists and staunch schizoanalysts excepted -> something I hope is true, although I don't know for sure that it's true. some of the reasoning of this ontology project is that I hope, in theory, that non-binary proposition-based logic could be enough to pick off a couple center-Liberal social-democrats. I don't expect the impact of that to be very big. so more than that I see this as a project for Marxists and allies which is uniquely structured to be able to survive the pressures of Liberal-republicanism and come out the other end having started with a form that looks conventional to Liberal-republicanism and ended with a form that has the feel that Marxism and any associated historical events were obvious, the "last thursdayism" of philosophy where [[Term:retroversion|the way things are always existed]] even though it clearly didn't.

</li><li class="field_mdem" data-qid="29,27" value="2927" data-dimension="S2">Bibles are appealing because they number propositions / Biblical verses and proverbs are just numbered propositions / The way to create a "Communist bible" that people far and wide can easily reference has little to do with compilation into a book and is simply to take a lot of propositions and number them / Science can learn from the bible by numbering propositions in order to keep track of standing versus rejected hypotheses

</li></ol>

== Ideology codes ==

<ol class="hue clean compound">

</ol>

* (none)

[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]]