User:RD/9k/Q37,77 - Revision history

Reversedragon: Political positions part populations

2026-02-11T03:21:51Z

Political positions part populations

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:21, 11 February 2026
Line 35:		Line 35:

	<li class="field_mdem" data-tradition="MX" data-qid="29,35" value="2935" data-dimension="S2">Culture is the opposite of liberty / Authority isn't the opposite of liberty; the opposite of liberty is culture -> authoritarianism can't exist without culture, in the sense of individuals joining into a larger material object called a countable culture. however, culture can exist without The State and easily perform the same function that The State does. this would be one of the minimum corrections that would make the right-Liberal political compass closer to accurate.		<li class="field_mdem" data-tradition="MX" data-qid="29,35" value="2935" data-dimension="S2">Culture is the opposite of liberty / Authority isn't the opposite of liberty; the opposite of liberty is culture -> authoritarianism can't exist without culture, in the sense of individuals joining into a larger material object called a countable culture. however, culture can exist without The State and easily perform the same function that The State does. this would be one of the minimum corrections that would make the right-Liberal political compass closer to accurate.

			</li><li class="field_mdem" data-tradition="MX onto LR" value="618" data-dimension="S2">Political positions part populations (bills; policies; divide; split; meta-Marxism) / Whenever a body of people wishes to enforce a particular policy or transformation back onto itself, it will materially divide people into a countable team of people who are loyal to carrying it out and a countable team of people who are against it / ([[User:RD/9k/Q5044\|9k]])

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

Reversedragon: Culture is the opposite of liberty

2026-02-06T02:11:44Z

Culture is the opposite of liberty

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:11, 6 February 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">		<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">

	~~</li>~~<li data-qid="37,77" value="3777" class="field_exstruct" data-dimension="S2">[[Ontology:Q3777\|Democracy is government of the person by the people]] / Democracy is government of the person, by the people and for the people / culturocracy proposition / democulture proposition (not explaining the component of "democratic" control of culture)		<li data-qid="37,77" value="3777" class="field_exstruct" data-dimension="S2">[[Ontology:Q3777\|Democracy is government of the person by the people]] / Democracy is government of the person, by the people and for the people / culturocracy proposition / democulture proposition (not explaining the component of "democratic" control of culture)

	</li><li class="field_anarchy" data-remark="anarculture" data-qid="37,78" value="3778" data-dimension="S2">Democracy is government of the culture by the people / Democracy is the people overcoming the Spanishness Office / democulturocracy proposition / democulture proposition (more proper one) / anarculture proposition (one of them) -> culturocracy is a "real" meta-Marxist term, but "democulturocracy proposition" is to be taken as a proper name, not an actual term; even I think that word is too silly.		</li><li class="field_anarchy" data-remark="anarculture" data-qid="37,78" value="3778" data-dimension="S2">Democracy is government of the culture by the people / Democracy is the people overcoming the Spanishness Office / democulturocracy proposition / democulture proposition (more proper one) / anarculture proposition (one of them) -> culturocracy is a "real" meta-Marxist term, but "democulturocracy proposition" is to be taken as a proper name, not an actual term; even I think that word is too silly.
Line 27:		Line 27:
	</li><li class="field_mdem" data-tradition="MX onto LR, MX onto ES" data-qid="37,84" value="3784" data-dimension="S2">The United States already is democulture / The United States already has democulturocracy -> the claim that the United States actually operates on a system of forcing every single individual to perform a certain list of [[E:Idealism\|cultural values]] at gunpoint, and "democracy" (republican structures) serves only to spread out that basic process of culturocracy over the whole population or at least a selected ruling population of representatives derived from the population.<br/>		</li><li class="field_mdem" data-tradition="MX onto LR, MX onto ES" data-qid="37,84" value="3784" data-dimension="S2">The United States already is democulture / The United States already has democulturocracy -> the claim that the United States actually operates on a system of forcing every single individual to perform a certain list of [[E:Idealism\|cultural values]] at gunpoint, and "democracy" (republican structures) serves only to spread out that basic process of culturocracy over the whole population or at least a selected ruling population of representatives derived from the population.<br/>
	the corollary, not directly included in this proposition, is that mainstream Marxism-Leninism really is demo-ocracy: government of the physical population of people by the people. a Marxist state truly only wishes to "control" people's bodies while Liberal-republicanism seeks to completely control people's minds and exert authoritarian control over countable cultures and ethnicities that are more closely connected with themselves than with it. in some senses it will always spawn anarchism in response to its strange, incomprehensible methods, because countable cultures fundamentally don't like being culturally controlled like that, White or non-White.		the corollary, not directly included in this proposition, is that mainstream Marxism-Leninism really is demo-ocracy: government of the physical population of people by the people. a Marxist state truly only wishes to "control" people's bodies while Liberal-republicanism seeks to completely control people's minds and exert authoritarian control over countable cultures and ethnicities that are more closely connected with themselves than with it. in some senses it will always spawn anarchism in response to its strange, incomprehensible methods, because countable cultures fundamentally don't like being culturally controlled like that, White or non-White.

			</li></ol>

			== Democulture and exmat ==

			<ol class="hue clean">

			<li class="field_mdem" data-tradition="MX" data-qid="29,35" value="2935" data-dimension="S2">Culture is the opposite of liberty / Authority isn't the opposite of liberty; the opposite of liberty is culture -> authoritarianism can't exist without culture, in the sense of individuals joining into a larger material object called a countable culture. however, culture can exist without The State and easily perform the same function that The State does. this would be one of the minimum corrections that would make the right-Liberal political compass closer to accurate.

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

Reversedragon: Do not what others would not "unto"

2026-02-04T13:39:14Z

Do not what others would not "unto"

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:39, 4 February 2026
Line 15:		Line 15:
	<li data-qid="618" value="618" data-tradition="ES" class="field_exstruct" data-dimension="S2">Everyone makes their own meaning ([[E:early-existentialist tradition\|existentialism]])		<li data-qid="618" value="618" data-tradition="ES" class="field_exstruct" data-dimension="S2">Everyone makes their own meaning ([[E:early-existentialist tradition\|existentialism]])

	</li><li data-qid="36,66" value="3666" data-remark="sinners" class="field_exstruct" data-dimension="S2">[[~~Ontology~~:Q3666\|Individual choices immediately shape the health of society]] / Individual choices immediately contribute to the health of society -> the nexus point where we see Existentialism being born inside the context of ancient religions; what is in my opinion the core of defining "sin", as well as the Buddhist concept of "unhelpful mental factors" that impede meditation and also society.		</li><li data-qid="36,66" value="3666" data-remark="sinners" class="field_exstruct" data-dimension="S2">[[E:Q3666\|Individual choices immediately shape the health of society]] / Individual choices immediately contribute to the health of society -> the nexus point where we see Existentialism being born inside the context of ancient religions; what is in my opinion the core of defining "sin", as well as the Buddhist concept of "unhelpful mental factors" that impede meditation and also society.

	</li><li data-qid="36,67" value="3667" class="field_exstruct" data-dimension="S2">[[~~Ontology~~:Q3667\|Nothing should be done unless everybody considers it wonderful]] / ~~"they had such good reasons for doing what they did that the ends justify the means"~~ -> ~~I am so sick of this phrase and its use~~ in ~~analyzing both fiction~~ and ~~reality. there are so many wrong assumptions in~~ it ~~that are difficult to dig up at first~~, ~~but whenever anyone uses this concept it always totally distorts their view of how reality really works. you~~ get ~~so many crazy propositions~~ out of ~~this like that~~ it's ~~absolutely~~ not ~~allowed to investigate how reality works without obeying metaphysics, etc.~~		</li><li data-qid="36,67" value="3667" class="field_exstruct" data-dimension="S2">Do not what others would not "unto" / [[E:Q3667\|Nothing should be done unless everybody considers it wonderful]] / ([[User:RD/9k/Q36,67\|9k]]) -> proposition that the [[E:Shenlong effect\|Shenlong effect]] must be expected to physically happen just because one believes in ethics, and one can presume things to be abnormal when it doesn't physically happen<br/>
			ultimately, believing in ethics doesn't necessarily get everyone out of biases as it's something of a cognitive bias in and of itself.<br/>
			here, "unto" is being twisted into a verb such the sentence means "Do not what others would not normally-see-happen-as-a-spontaneous-event-unto-them"

	</li><li data-qid="36,64" value="3664" class="field_anarchy" data-dimension="S2">Culture is nothing more than the set of signs many individuals spontaneously make up -> this is ultimately why people think there's a "Spanishness Office". Existentialism. they think that if they tell one person, who is [[E:One person is equivalent to the whole population (education)\|perfectly equivalent to the whole population]], to change their way of thinking that everybody will spontaneously change, unanimously flipping over the policies of the Spanishness Office. but there are several wrong assumptions in there. one, knowledge doesn't travel faster than light to everybody at once. two, individuals have different content, and whenever they hear the same message, this sorts them into different factions and different opposing courses of action. imagine any two individuals, Stalin and Trotsky, Goku and Vegeta. you tell them the exact same statement, and they take it to mean totally different things, and any allies they have take it to mean the same thing. "Freeza is descending on Planet Vegeta". (if you live on earth, is it a good thing for Saiyans to cease to exist?) "The Soviet Union will fall apart if people don't properly participate". (Trotsky, Zinoviev: that's fantastic!) "Inclusive history education will give marginalized people more power." (Floridians: then let's destroy it, we can't have that.) you have to plan any attempt to "inform everyone" around this inherent separation into ideological subpopulations.		</li><li data-qid="36,64" value="3664" class="field_anarchy" data-dimension="S2">Culture is nothing more than the set of signs many individuals spontaneously make up -> this is ultimately why people think there's a "Spanishness Office". Existentialism. they think that if they tell one person, who is [[E:One person is equivalent to the whole population (education)\|perfectly equivalent to the whole population]], to change their way of thinking that everybody will spontaneously change, unanimously flipping over the policies of the Spanishness Office. but there are several wrong assumptions in there. one, knowledge doesn't travel faster than light to everybody at once. two, individuals have different content, and whenever they hear the same message, this sorts them into different factions and different opposing courses of action. imagine any two individuals, Stalin and Trotsky, Goku and Vegeta. you tell them the exact same statement, and they take it to mean totally different things, and any allies they have take it to mean the same thing. "Freeza is descending on Planet Vegeta". (if you live on earth, is it a good thing for Saiyans to cease to exist?) "The Soviet Union will fall apart if people don't properly participate". (Trotsky, Zinoviev: that's fantastic!) "Inclusive history education will give marginalized people more power." (Floridians: then let's destroy it, we can't have that.) you have to plan any attempt to "inform everyone" around this inherent separation into ideological subpopulations.

Reversedragon: Reversedragon moved page User:RD/9k/Q3777 to User:RD/9k/Q37,77: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title

2026-02-03T03:03:52Z

Reversedragon moved page User:RD/9k/Q3777 to User:RD/9k/Q37,77: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:03, 3 February 2026
(No difference)

Reversedragon: copy markup from 9k/Q42,13

2026-02-03T03:03:26Z

copy markup from 9k/Q42,13

New page

{{NextNineThousand|PPPA=democulturocracy|User=RD|E=Q37,77|Contents=y}}
== Democulture definition ==
<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">

</li><li data-qid="37,77" value="3777" class="field_exstruct" data-dimension="S2">[[Ontology:Q3777|Democracy is government of the person by the people]] / Democracy is government of the person, by the people and for the people / culturocracy proposition / democulture proposition (not explaining the component of "democratic" control of culture)

</li><li class="field_anarchy" data-remark="anarculture" data-qid="37,78" value="3778" data-dimension="S2">Democracy is government of the culture by the people / Democracy is the people overcoming the Spanishness Office / democulturocracy proposition / democulture proposition (more proper one) / anarculture proposition (one of them) -> culturocracy is a "real" meta-Marxist term, but "democulturocracy proposition" is to be taken as a proper name, not an actual term; even I think that word is too silly.

</li></ol>

== Kantian ethics and its consequences ==

<ol class="hue clean">

<li data-qid="618" value="618" data-tradition="ES" class="field_exstruct" data-dimension="S2">Everyone makes their own meaning ([[E:early-existentialist tradition|existentialism]])

</li><li data-qid="36,66" value="3666" data-remark="sinners" class="field_exstruct" data-dimension="S2">[[Ontology:Q3666|Individual choices immediately shape the health of society]] / Individual choices immediately contribute to the health of society -> the nexus point where we see Existentialism being born inside the context of ancient religions; what is in my opinion the core of defining "sin", as well as the Buddhist concept of "unhelpful mental factors" that impede meditation and also society.

</li><li data-qid="36,67" value="3667" class="field_exstruct" data-dimension="S2">[[Ontology:Q3667|Nothing should be done unless everybody considers it wonderful]] / "they had such good reasons for doing what they did that the ends justify the means" -> I am so sick of this phrase and its use in analyzing both fiction and reality. there are so many wrong assumptions in it that are difficult to dig up at first, but whenever anyone uses this concept it always totally distorts their view of how reality really works. you get so many crazy propositions out of this like that it's absolutely not allowed to investigate how reality works without obeying metaphysics, etc.

</li><li data-qid="36,64" value="3664" class="field_anarchy" data-dimension="S2">Culture is nothing more than the set of signs many individuals spontaneously make up -> this is ultimately why people think there's a "Spanishness Office". Existentialism. they think that if they tell one person, who is [[E:One person is equivalent to the whole population (education)|perfectly equivalent to the whole population]], to change their way of thinking that everybody will spontaneously change, unanimously flipping over the policies of the Spanishness Office. but there are several wrong assumptions in there. one, knowledge doesn't travel faster than light to everybody at once. two, individuals have different content, and whenever they hear the same message, this sorts them into different factions and different opposing courses of action. imagine any two individuals, Stalin and Trotsky, Goku and Vegeta. you tell them the exact same statement, and they take it to mean totally different things, and any allies they have take it to mean the same thing. "Freeza is descending on Planet Vegeta". (if you live on earth, is it a good thing for Saiyans to cease to exist?) "The Soviet Union will fall apart if people don't properly participate". (Trotsky, Zinoviev: that's fantastic!) "Inclusive history education will give marginalized people more power." (Floridians: then let's destroy it, we can't have that.) you have to plan any attempt to "inform everyone" around this inherent separation into ideological subpopulations.

</li><li data-qid="36,65" value="3665" class="field_anarchy" data-dimension="S2">No one should make their own meaning unless others consider it wonderful / People shouldn't spontaneously make up culture and signs unless it's wonderful -> Q3667 + Q?? everyone creates their own meaning = this. anarculture proposition / democulture proposition. I think this one is anarculture but it turns into democulture practically speaking with another proposition

</li><li class="field_mdem" data-tradition="MX onto LR, MX onto ES" data-qid="37,84" value="3784" data-dimension="S2">The United States already is democulture / The United States already has democulturocracy -> the claim that the United States actually operates on a system of forcing every single individual to perform a certain list of [[E:Idealism|cultural values]] at gunpoint, and "democracy" (republican structures) serves only to spread out that basic process of culturocracy over the whole population or at least a selected ruling population of representatives derived from the population.<br/>
the corollary, not directly included in this proposition, is that mainstream Marxism-Leninism really is demo-ocracy: government of the physical population of people by the people. a Marxist state truly only wishes to "control" people's bodies while Liberal-republicanism seeks to completely control people's minds and exert authoritarian control over countable cultures and ethnicities that are more closely connected with themselves than with it. in some senses it will always spawn anarchism in response to its strange, incomprehensible methods, because countable cultures fundamentally don't like being culturally controlled like that, White or non-White.

</li></ol>

== Ideology codes ==

* A / anarculture
* IK / Kantian ethics
* MX onto LR
* MX onto ES


[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]]