User:RD/9k/Q50,44 - Revision history

Reversedragon: It's possible to have political positions without it being a team sport

2026-02-11T03:38:13Z

It's possible to have political positions without it being a team sport

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:38, 11 February 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">		<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">

	</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="50,44" value="5044" data-dimension="S2">it's possible to have political positions without it being a team sport - no. it's not. chunk competition / CCASH and Social-Philosophical Systems / SPS prohibit that. center-Liberal rationalists are so stupid. you know what the worst thing is? this was used to justify Trotsky in the same sentence. Trotsky violently attacked a republic due to his extreme views. I mean, what else do you term an assassination? anybody who doesn't realize hegemony politics currently exists (even if it's not a good thing) and treat it as if it exists is just, hanging out feeling like they owe nothing to a population continuing to exist and it's okay to let every other individual die except maybe a couple friendly businesses they buy things from if current policies benefit their own business. when you refuse to play "team sports" whole nationalities and ethnicities of people cease to be because all the people in them scatter to different capitalist cities. only a few things are more prejudiced than that. every population is based on a molecularized yet competitive process of people building populational structures through free association that at times harm each other and exist in mutual exclusion. you can't just "criticize" these without understanding their physical interaction and the fact that some of them have to be treated as correct and some as incorrect. correct structures bring down regulations on incorrect structures. this is the basis of Liberal democracy. SPS-based democulture. if one person standing by and writing a bunch of Zinovievism could change the world just because they had "good ideas" there would be no need for elections.		</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-tradition="LR, LR onto IV" data-qid="50,44" value="5044" data-dimension="S2">It's possible to have political positions without it being a team sport -> no. it's not. chunk competition / CCASH and Social-Philosophical Systems / SPS prohibit that. center-Liberal rationalists are so stupid. you know what the worst thing is? this was used to justify Trotsky in the same sentence. Trotsky violently attacked a republic due to his extreme views. I mean, what else do you term an assassination? anybody who doesn't realize hegemony politics currently exists (even if it's not a good thing) and treat it as if it exists is just, hanging out feeling like they owe nothing to a population continuing to exist and it's okay to let every other individual die except maybe a couple friendly businesses they buy things from if current policies benefit their own business. when you refuse to play "team sports" whole nationalities and ethnicities of people cease to be because all the people in them scatter to different capitalist cities. only a few things are more prejudiced than that. every population is based on a molecularized yet competitive process of people building populational structures through free association that at times harm each other and exist in mutual exclusion. you can't just "criticize" these without understanding their physical interaction and the fact that some of them have to be treated as correct and some as incorrect. correct structures bring down regulations on incorrect structures. this is the basis of Liberal democracy. SPS-based democulture. if one person standing by and writing a bunch of Zinovievism could change the world just because they had "good ideas" there would be no need for elections.

			</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="50,44" value="5044" data-dimension="S2">It's possible to have political positions without it being a team sport -> you know, the really really funny thing about this is not just A) that Trotsky blatantly formed another team and cut the central party in two, but B) that they're using Bolshevism to prove something is true about Liberal-republicanism. like, today it could hypothetically be true that it's "possible to have political positions without it being a team sport" inside the CPC but not possible in the United States Congress. and the person who said this seemingly never even thought about that.

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>
Line 23:		Line 25:
	</ol>		</ol>

			* LR
			* LR onto IV
	* MX onto LR		* MX onto LR

Reversedragon: Reversedragon moved page User:RD/9k/Q5044 to User:RD/9k/Q50,44: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title

2026-02-11T03:31:05Z

Reversedragon moved page User:RD/9k/Q5044 to User:RD/9k/Q50,44: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:31, 11 February 2026
(No difference)

Reversedragon: synonyms

2026-02-11T03:14:53Z

synonyms

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:14, 11 February 2026
Line 13:		Line 13:
	<li class="field_mdem" data-tradition="MX onto LR" value="618" data-dimension="S2">Political positions divide populations / Whenever a body of people wishes to enforce a particular policy or transformation back onto itself, it will materially divide people into a countable team of people who are loyal to carrying it out and a countable team of people who are against it -><br/>		<li class="field_mdem" data-tradition="MX onto LR" value="618" data-dimension="S2">Political positions divide populations / Whenever a body of people wishes to enforce a particular policy or transformation back onto itself, it will materially divide people into a countable team of people who are loyal to carrying it out and a countable team of people who are against it -><br/>
	...hang on. that's super close to being alliterated		...hang on. that's super close to being alliterated
	</li><li class="field_mdem" value="618" data-dimension="S2">Political positions part populations		</li><li class="field_mdem" value="618" data-dimension="S2">Political positions part populations (bills; policies; divide; split; meta-Marxism)

	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

Reversedragon: Political positions part populations

2026-02-11T03:12:40Z

Political positions part populations

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:12, 11 February 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{NextNineThousand\|PPPA=~~True people versus False people~~\|User=RD\|E=Q50,44\|Contents=y}}		{{NextNineThousand\|PPPA=Political positions part populations\|User=RD\|E=Q50,44\|Contents=y}}
	== Main ~~entries~~ ==		== Main entry ==
	<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">		<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">

Line 7:		Line 7:
	</li></ol>		</li></ol>

	== ~~Rationalizations~~ ==~~<!--~~		== meta-Marxist analyses against ==

	<ol class="hue clean">		<ol class="hue clean">

	</li></ol~~>--~~>		<li class="field_mdem" data-tradition="MX onto LR" value="618" data-dimension="S2">Political positions divide populations / Whenever a body of people wishes to enforce a particular policy or transformation back onto itself, it will materially divide people into a countable team of people who are loyal to carrying it out and a countable team of people who are against it -><br/>
			...hang on. that's super close to being alliterated
			</li><li class="field_mdem" value="618" data-dimension="S2">Political positions part populations

			</li></ol>

	== Ideology codes ==		== Ideology codes ==
Line 19:		Line 23:
	</ol>		</ol>

	* ~~(none)~~		* MX onto LR

Reversedragon: copy markup from 9k/Q50,44

2026-02-11T01:48:31Z

copy markup from 9k/Q50,44

New page

{{NextNineThousand|PPPA=True people versus False people|User=RD|E=Q50,44|Contents=y}}
== Main entries ==
<noinclude>{{HueCSS}}</noinclude><ol class="hue clean">

</li><li class="field_exstruct" data-qid="50,44" value="5044" data-dimension="S2">it's possible to have political positions without it being a team sport - no. it's not. chunk competition / CCASH and Social-Philosophical Systems / SPS prohibit that. center-Liberal rationalists are so stupid. you know what the worst thing is? this was used to justify Trotsky in the same sentence. Trotsky violently attacked a republic due to his extreme views. I mean, what else do you term an assassination? anybody who doesn't realize hegemony politics currently exists (even if it's not a good thing) and treat it as if it exists is just, hanging out feeling like they owe nothing to a population continuing to exist and it's okay to let every other individual die except maybe a couple friendly businesses they buy things from if current policies benefit their own business. when you refuse to play "team sports" whole nationalities and ethnicities of people cease to be because all the people in them scatter to different capitalist cities. only a few things are more prejudiced than that. every population is based on a molecularized yet competitive process of people building populational structures through free association that at times harm each other and exist in mutual exclusion. you can't just "criticize" these without understanding their physical interaction and the fact that some of them have to be treated as correct and some as incorrect. correct structures bring down regulations on incorrect structures. this is the basis of Liberal democracy. SPS-based democulture. if one person standing by and writing a bunch of Zinovievism could change the world just because they had "good ideas" there would be no need for elections.

</li></ol>

== Rationalizations ==

== Ideology codes ==

<ol class="hue clean compound">

</ol>

* (none)

[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]]